TSWLM/TND Connection
Colombo
Posts: 1MI6 Agent
Why is it that Tomorrow Never Dies is so controversial and The Spy Who Loved me is such a highly-revered classic? The two are carbon copies of each other (granted, TSWLM actually has a plot, whereas TND is almost non-stop action with no substance). The parallels between the two movies are quite apparent:
LEADING LADY:
- In both movies, the leading lady is a high-ranking military officer/agent from the major Communist power of the times. In TSWLM, it's the USSR, in TND, it's the PRC.
MAIN VILLAIN:
- Both movies have rather disappointing main villains. They are both totally unbelievable billionaire megalomaniacs and grossly unrealistic.
HENCHMAN:
- Both movies have invincible (and gigantic) supermen henchmen that are practically invincible.
LACK OF PRECISION:
- In TND, Bond simply mows down faceless henchmen with a submachine gun. Much like the big gun fight in TSWLM onboard the Liparus, and somewhat similar to Stromberg's anticlimactic and overly-violent death.
UNCONVINCING RELATIONSHIP, EVEN BY BOND STANDARDS:
- In TSWLM, Amasova vowed to kill Bond upon finding out that 007 was behind the death of her Russian lover. Just when she's about to put a bullet into her boyfriend's murderer, Bond convinces her to make out with him. This is somewhat similar to Bond's unconvincing relationship w/ Col. Lin in that who could possibly want her??? She treats Bond like scum and tries to act independent and tough (but gushes whenever 007 winks)...not to mention she looks like Jackie Chan with a wig.
In essence, both films are comic-book style spoof action movies. What gets me is why so many people think TSWLM is the best thing since sliced bread, while so many others think that TND is even worse than Godfather III. Does anyone have any ideas as to why that's the case?
LEADING LADY:
- In both movies, the leading lady is a high-ranking military officer/agent from the major Communist power of the times. In TSWLM, it's the USSR, in TND, it's the PRC.
MAIN VILLAIN:
- Both movies have rather disappointing main villains. They are both totally unbelievable billionaire megalomaniacs and grossly unrealistic.
HENCHMAN:
- Both movies have invincible (and gigantic) supermen henchmen that are practically invincible.
LACK OF PRECISION:
- In TND, Bond simply mows down faceless henchmen with a submachine gun. Much like the big gun fight in TSWLM onboard the Liparus, and somewhat similar to Stromberg's anticlimactic and overly-violent death.
UNCONVINCING RELATIONSHIP, EVEN BY BOND STANDARDS:
- In TSWLM, Amasova vowed to kill Bond upon finding out that 007 was behind the death of her Russian lover. Just when she's about to put a bullet into her boyfriend's murderer, Bond convinces her to make out with him. This is somewhat similar to Bond's unconvincing relationship w/ Col. Lin in that who could possibly want her??? She treats Bond like scum and tries to act independent and tough (but gushes whenever 007 winks)...not to mention she looks like Jackie Chan with a wig.
In essence, both films are comic-book style spoof action movies. What gets me is why so many people think TSWLM is the best thing since sliced bread, while so many others think that TND is even worse than Godfather III. Does anyone have any ideas as to why that's the case?
Comments
Anyway, that's my answer.
This is a pretty heavy over-simplification. For a start, between Anya pointing the gun at Bond and shooting the cork of the champagne, Bond doesn't say anything to convince her not to kill him. Bond and Anya were already lovers prior to Anya discovering that he had killed her previous lover. Bond rescues Anya from Atlantis even though he doesn't have to, and I suspect that Anya whilst on Atlantis with Stromberg, Anya did not believe that Bond would come back for her. When Anya confronts Bond with the picture of her dead lover, Bond says "People in our line of business get killed". Anya is an experienced agent who must realise that point over time. She then realises that in rescuing her, Bond is actually a good person and not the evil monster that she may have made him out to be, and is then able to forgive him, and return to being his lover.
Stranger things have happened at sea, and since they were at sea, it seems fine for strange things to happen.
In TND, the 2 nations are now Britain and China and the villian's aim is not worldwide political domination, but just exclusive media coverage in China (a form of domination).
Like with YOLT, TND has an oriental setting and sees Bond team up with the usual attractive female "enemy" agent, like in TSWLM.
TND seems to be the offspring of YOLT and TSWLM. Many ideas of both movies are clearly interwoven into it and it is perhaps this lack of originality that has seen the Bond's critised over the years (also see Max Zorin's blatant attempt to copy Goldfinger's Operation Grandslam in AVTAK).
Since Bond and Anya were thrown together as reluctant allies - the pair did brave all of Stromberg's perils in unity after all ..
Bond risked his neck to return for her. (Something he didn't have to do) - So I don't think it's terribly unrealistic for Anya to forgo her attitude of dominance just this once. Besides, he had the '52.