Branson Banned from BA!

HardyboyHardyboy Posts: 5,906Chief of Staff
Here's one from the wacky and wild world of corporate capitalism and the titanic egos therein involved, courtesy SkyNews:

Licence To Kill: BA Cuts Branson Cameo

Updated: 16:00, Saturday April 21, 2007

British Airways has shown a ruthlessness worthy of a James Bond villain by cutting Virgin boss Sir Richard Branson out of the new 007 film.

BA's entertainments team has removed his cameo from versions of Casino Royale being shown on the company's planes.


In the film Branson can be seen turning around after walking through a metal detector at Miami Airport.

He was given the cameo because Virgin Atlantic provided a plane that was used in the film. The plane's tailfin is being obscured for BA's inflight screenings.

A British Airways spokesman said: "We screen all films before they're used on our aircraft so that we can control the content of what is displayed.

"We have full control over what is shown."

A spokeswoman for Virgin Atlantic told Sky News Online she was aware that BA had cut any reference to Branson's company.

She added: "We never cut anything from films - we always give passengers the whole inflight entertainment experience - and we give them ice cream as well."

Relations between the rival carriers were strained last year after Virgin Atlantic Airways provided US and British authorities with information that triggered an investigation of alleged airline price-fixing in passenger fares and fuel surcharges involving British Airways.

If Branson's cameo is all that was cut from CR, then it's a miracle. I've seen some in-flight films that seemed to have all but the opening titles and end credits cut!
Vox clamantis in deserto

Comments

  • John DrakeJohn Drake On assignmentPosts: 2,564MI6 Agent
    I think removing Branson is the only real improvement you can make to CR. :))
  • Tilly Masterson 007Tilly Masterson 007 UKPosts: 1,472MI6 Agent
    The man aint even an actor! :))
  • s96024s96024 Posts: 1,519MI6 Agent
    Tbh I'd say it was a mistake on BA's part. What difference would it make if the cameo was left in. The publicity about them being so petty and childlike is worse.
  • Mr MartiniMr Martini That nice house in the sky.Posts: 2,707MI6 Agent
    Hardyboy wrote:

    She added: "We never cut anything from films - we always give passengers the whole inflight entertainment experience - and we give them ice cream as well."


    :)) :)) :)) :))
    Some people would complain even if you hang them with a new rope
  • Moore Not LessMoore Not Less Posts: 1,095MI6 Agent
    It does seem rather petty, especially as Richard Branson's cameo is barely two seconds long. Blink and you missed him.
  • JennyFlexFanJennyFlexFan Posts: 1,497MI6 Agent
    Wow! It's only a guy and an airplane! It's even a blink-and-you'll-miss-it type deal as I didn't even see Branson until my second (unfortunately) viewing of the film. There's a tailfin shown? In all honesty, who's going to notice that?

    It's not like Richard Branson ran up to the camera and was like LOOK AT ME, I'M RICHARD BRANSON, PRESIDENT OF VIRGIN!!!!

    Speaking of cutting things out of CR to make it better... ;)
  • Moonraker 5Moonraker 5 Ayrshire, ScotlandPosts: 1,821MI6 Agent
    edited April 2007
    Well, I've always been more of a BA man myself, but they get even more credit for cutting a bit of a cringeworthy cameo :D

    Maybe they'll airbrush a big Union Jack logo over his aeroplane's tailfins in the film next? :))
    unitedkingdom.png
  • emtiememtiem SurreyPosts: 5,948MI6 Agent
    It's brilliant- I love it when these two get fightin' again; it's like watching two children in a sandpit! :D
  • NightshooterNightshooter In bed with SolitairePosts: 2,917MI6 Agent
    emtiem wrote:
    It's brilliant- I love it when these two get fightin' again; it's like watching two children in a sandpit! :D

    Don't you mean like watching a ferret and a snake? ;)
  • taitytaity Posts: 702MI6 Agent
    ya know, GE, TND and DAD all had BA promotions. Maybe BA was just cut that they werent in it.
  • cosmo_kramercosmo_kramer Duluth, MinnesotaPosts: 24MI6 Agent
    What's the real point of this? I don't really think someone is going to walk out of the inflight movie and go fly Virgin instead... for numerous reasons.
  • A7ceA7ce Birmingham, EnglandPosts: 656MI6 Agent
    http://uk.news.yahoo.com/itn/20080205/ten-virgin-picked-for-new-bond-film-ea4616c_1.html

    Whether it's by boat, car or motorbike a super spy has to get around somehow.

    And of course jetting around the world in search of bad guys is essential for James Bond - who has chosen Virgin Atlantic as his airline of choice.

    Sir Richard Branson's planes are set to feature in the new Bond film Quantum of Solace, starring Daniel Craig once again as 007.

    Virgin aircraft have already appeared in Casino Royale along with a cameo role by Sir Branson. But in a real-life twist, Virgin's arch rivals British Airways edited out the mogul and digitally removed the Virgin logo from their in-flight screenings of the film.

    It's expected that BA will again announce their plans on what their Bond policy will be when the film comes out in November.

    Virgin has also been revealed as a marketing partner for the new film and will promote the release around the world.

    Sir Richard said: "Virgin Atlantic and James Bond make a great partnership - slick, smooth and renowned the world over. Casino Royale propelled Bond to greater success and we're certain that Quantum of Solace will set an even higher standard."
  • MailfistMailfist Posts: 246MI6 Agent
    Good. Pity the producers hadn't cut him from the movie as well. Just for a split second watching the brilliant CR I thought I was in a timewarp back to the Roger Moore era.
  • PinewoodSpyPinewoodSpy Posts: 21MI6 Agent
    I'm sure Richard is laughing all the way to the bank (and using BA as his chosen carrier) - He like all airline moguls get free air travel on whatever carrier they choose.
Sign In or Register to comment.