Daniel Craig in WW2 epic

John DrakeJohn Drake On assignmentPosts: 2,564MI6 Agent
Empire is reporting that Ed Zwick has cast Daniel Craig in his new movie, 'Defiance'. They also have a dig at CnB.

http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=20709

Ed Zwick, as director of the likes of The Last Samurai and Blood Diamond, has an unassailable talent for making the bloody and amoral look staggeringly beautiful. He also spins a darn good yarn. So we're very keen to see what he does with the second world war in his next movie Defiance, on which he'll also fulfill writing, producing and occasional tea-making duties.

Described as epic (natch) the film is the true story of four brothers in Nazi occupied Poland who flee to the Belarussian forest with a band of Jews and join forces with Russian Resistance fighters. Frankly, he had us at Belarussian.

Zwick's also secured himself a humdinger of a leading man in Daniel Craig. As far as we're concerned Craig can do no wrong these days. You craigisnotbond (ohyesheis) haters may fill the space below with statements to the contrary, but we will not see them and we will not respond.

Sounds promising. :007)

Comments

  • bluemanblueman PDXPosts: 1,667MI6 Agent
    Plum role, good for Danny.

    Hell, when has EON ever hired a guy this immediately employable? Craig's growing number of A-list parts seems to dwarf Connery's "Marnie" etc., Lazenby's...er, Moore's "Gold" etc., Dalton's...um, and is rapidly approaching Brosnan's ten year collection of leading roles done around his four Bond films, and Danny's only been Bond for a year! {[] Jeez dude, slow down! :D Just kinda weird, to have such a wanted Bond.
  • Sir Hillary BraySir Hillary Bray College of ArmsPosts: 2,174MI6 Agent
    blueman wrote:
    Plum role, good for Danny.

    Hell, when has EON ever hired a guy this immediately employable? Craig's growing number of A-list parts seems to dwarf Connery's "Marnie" etc., Lazenby's...er, Moore's "Gold" etc., Dalton's...um, and is rapidly approaching Brosnan's ten year collection of leading roles done around his four Bond films, and Danny's only been Bond for a year! {[] Jeez dude, slow down! :D Just kinda weird, to have such a wanted Bond.

    Very true...and, I fear, the reason that Craig will not be long in the Bond role. If his current workload and general high regard in the film world were to continue, would it surprise anyone if he walked away after three films, to fry bigger (or at least different) fish? :(
    Hilly...you old devil!
  • Asp9mmAsp9mm Over the Hills and Far Away.Posts: 7,541MI6 Agent
    I think he will walk away at three. It will probably be a good decision too. I'm sure the Craig Bond trilogy will be regarded as the best in the series if they continue in the same vein {[]
    ..................Asp9mmSIG-1-2.jpg...............
  • Tee HeeTee Hee CBT Headquarters: Chicago, ILPosts: 917MI6 Agent
    edited May 2007
    Very true...and, I fear, the reason that Craig will not be long in the Bond role. If his current workload and general high regard in the film world were to continue, would it surprise anyone if he walked away after three films, to fry bigger (or at least different) fish? :(

    No, it wouldn't surprise me. But when he does decide to leave, I will gladly fetch his apron and send him off with a parting gift: some tartar sauce for his fish fry. :D
    "My acting range? Left eyebrow raised, right eyebrow raised..."

    -Roger Moore
  • HowardBHowardB USAPosts: 2,767MI6 Agent
    Looks like playing Bond has opened up some real good opportunities for Craig in big budget films. With the WWII film, Craig seems to be the new "action hero with a brain". Good for him. Obviously Craig has a contract for three Bond films. The folks at EON may historically be cheap, but they are not stupid and also have Sony as a partner. It was a good move on their part to give Craig a couple million bonus for CR. I think Craig might do a 4th Bond if the 2nd and 3rd maintain or surpass the artistic quality and box office of CR and of course if EON and Sony throw a huge pile of $$$$$$ at him.
  • Sir Hillary BraySir Hillary Bray College of ArmsPosts: 2,174MI6 Agent
    Tee Hee wrote:
    Very true...and, I fear, the reason that Craig will not be long in the Bond role. If his current workload and general high regard in the film world were to continue, would it surprise anyone if he walked away after three films, to fry bigger (or at least different) fish? :(

    No, it wouldn't surprise me. But when he does decide to leave, I will gladly fetch his apron and send him off with a parting gift: some tartar sauce for his fish fry. :D

    Followed, no doubt, by your calling up Rog and trying to get him to do his eighth so you can finally be happy again. :p
    Hilly...you old devil!
  • Tee HeeTee Hee CBT Headquarters: Chicago, ILPosts: 917MI6 Agent
    Followed, no doubt, by your calling up Rog and trying to get him to do his eighth so you can finally be happy again. :p

    :))

    Well if you can get him back, of course... ;)

    No no, I've fully accepted the end of Sir Roger's tenure. And I have been satisfied with the Dalton and Brosnan eras that followed. In fact, this is the first time in Bond's history that I have been unhappy. Nothing personal against Craig; he's a fine actor. He's just not Bond to me. Don't get me wrong, there are plenty of things I liked about CR, and I am optimistic that Craig will better capture the essence of Bond in his next two entries. However, I am not going to hold my breath.

    Anyone got Roger's number? :D
    "My acting range? Left eyebrow raised, right eyebrow raised..."

    -Roger Moore
  • LoeffelholzLoeffelholz The United States, With LovePosts: 8,998Quartermasters
    edited May 2007
    craigisnotbond (ohyesheis)

    :))

    This is a good tradition: Bond actors in war films (Connery in The Longest Day and A Bridge Too Far, Moore in The Wild Geese*)...

    Yes, the suitors are lining up for (Formerly) Poor Danny...and keeping him beyond three Bonds will be a challenge---particularly if Eon are unable to keep the character interesting for him. Still, it's a good point made about Sony being involved; their pockets might be sufficiently deep...

    * Okay, Wild Geese is a mercenary picture...but there's plenty of shooting and killing B-)
    Check out my Amazon author page! Mark Loeffelholz
    "I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
    "Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
  • bluemanblueman PDXPosts: 1,667MI6 Agent
    I think it'll take Bond 22 being in the ballpark of CR in terms of overall quality for me to not think I'm in Bond Oz or something...just can't get over EON making a Bond film like they cared. {:) Been a while.
  • Klaus HergescheimerKlaus Hergescheimer Posts: 332MI6 Agent
    When is Gay Bikers on Acid coming out, again?
  • Waltherppk007Waltherppk007 Posts: 27MI6 Agent
    You know, I really think that Craig relishes his role as bond and as long as they keep the character headed in its current direction I would think he'd stick around. Most of the time you can tell when someone is phoning it in, and he in no way gave off that vibe. That said I'm looking forward to this movie. I find that part of the war extremely interesting anyway so this just tops it off.
  • NightshooterNightshooter In bed with SolitairePosts: 2,917MI6 Agent
    When is Gay Bikers on Acid coming out, again?

    Soon, I hope.

    Maybe THAT is the name of Bond 22?
  • John DrakeJohn Drake On assignmentPosts: 2,564MI6 Agent
    When is Gay Bikers on Acid coming out, again?

    Soon, I hope.

    Maybe THAT is the name of Bond 22?

    In which case, Shirley Bassey MUST sing the title song. :D
Sign In or Register to comment.