Bond 23 back to MGM

youknowmynameyouknowmyname Gainesville, FL, USAPosts: 703MI6 Agent
I posted this in another thread regarding Craig's 5 movie deal, but thought I would also start a new topic.

MGM is going to take back control of the Bond franchise starting with Bond 23. The Sony chief is a little upset, there is nothing official from the MGM office as of yet (unless one of you internet sleuths can find something I couldn't).

http://www.mi6.co.uk/news/index.php?itemid=5536

What do you think about this? Good move/bad move/indifferent?

I think it will be a bad move in some ways. I don't know how much Sony had to do with CR being so energy filled and publicized so well, but I daresay they had to do something with it. CR went over really well and it is a shame to see them only get to helm 2 films. Just take a look at the fact that they did such good research on the Bond popularity of Craig (although MGM could've had something to do with this). Plus, Sony is in my backyard (I had my senior prom on their backlot) and I like the things they do.

However, I also am a traditionalist and like seeing that lion before the Bond films. It's part of putting on the DVD for me. Additionally, MGM have pulled off some great projects, although I don't think as well or widely publicized and pushed. So, it may be good as well.

P.S. We should get a Bond 23 forum going. With Sony's announcement regarding the release date (although this may change?) and this new announcement, there will be more to come I am sure. Plus, once Bond 22 gets rolling in January, Bond 23 is soon to be the next big topic of discussion.
"We have all the time in the world..."

Comments

  • SurrieSurrie Surrey, UKPosts: 79MI6 Agent
    I do think Sony had something to do with CR's sucess but on the other side of things I do feel quite pleased MGM is going to take control of Bond again.

    Because I feel however good change can be it is nice to always keep the old relics lying about, and keep some of Bond the same. Because MGM has in some way got the franchise to where it is today.
    What counts is what the heroine provokes, or rather what she represents. She is the one, or rather the love or fear she inspires in the hero , or else the concern he feels for her, who makes him act the way he does.

    Author of 'Pussy Galore - A Representation of Women in James Bond Films'.
    Active tweeter and tumbler - https://twitter.com/surrie_fullard
  • 00-Agent00-Agent CaliforniaPosts: 453MI6 Agent
    I think the creative direction of the Bond films rests with Babs and Wilson. I don't think it should make much difference other than seeing less Sony product placement in the film.:D
    "A blunt instrument wielded by a Government department. Hard, ruthless, sardonic, fatalistic. He likes gambling, golf, fast motor cars. All his movements are relaxed and economical". Ian Fleming
  • darenhatdarenhat The Old PuebloPosts: 2,029Quartermasters
    00-Agent wrote:
    I don't think it should make much difference other than seeing less Sony product placement in the film.:D

    That alone is a plus!
  • youknowmynameyouknowmyname Gainesville, FL, USAPosts: 703MI6 Agent
    darenhat wrote:
    00-Agent wrote:
    I don't think it should make much difference other than seeing less Sony product placement in the film.:D

    That alone is a plus!

    So true, honestly as I keep watching the movie it bugs me more and more. Imagine if product placement was that rampant in times past, it would've been ridiculous.
    "We have all the time in the world..."
Sign In or Register to comment.