I'd say, that it's the same Rolex Milgauss GV like on the pic, that I have posted on page 4.
Yep, I think you are right, Rolex Milgauss.
DG
So, what sharp little eyes you've got...wait till you get to my teeth.
"People sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." Richard Grenier after George Orwell, Washington Times 1993.
Seiko LED never have been in the movies.
As far as I know, they never did (L)ight (E)mitting (D)iode Displays.
If you are asking for Seiko LCD fans, I am here
President of the 'Misty Eyes Club'.
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
The problem with that particular individual is that he was shown not to be very knowledgeable about Bond watches on this very forum. I suppose that's why he erased all of his posts. That's extreme mania!
Add to that the fact that the idea for the literary James Bond watch was postulated by M4tt in a thread over at Watchuseek before this individual published his article. Not to mention the fact that the individual in question was involved in that thread in a very negative and combative way.
The Connery gold watch theory was wrong! The first filmed scenes were filmed in Jamaica and only show the Rolex Submariner. The scenes with the gold watch that appear first in Dr. No were actually filmed much later at Pinewood Studios.
I also understand that this individual also got into a pissing match about a Moore era Seiko T.V. watch over at the "Nerd Watch Forum". One of our forum members here showed that his information was wrong. Rather than taking it like a man, and admitting his mistake, he became vindictive and spitefull.
In just about every forum this individual goes to, there seems to be a problem whenever the subject of Bond watches come up. I think the Bond community is beginning to learn that this person is bad news and not credible. It's also starting to spread to the watch community, albeit slowly.
If you've lost the Bond community, what's the point?
DG
So, what sharp little eyes you've got...wait till you get to my teeth.
"People sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." Richard Grenier after George Orwell, Washington Times 1993.
there is nothing but praise for this forum here, its owners and some members The recent one is about you, DG.
I wonder, when it will be coming to me, I suppose in blog nr. 163 of the suspicion theory, where all the anger comes from.
There is only one reason, why there is all the anger, plain and simple:
It's his personality and the way, he's doing things! {:)
President of the 'Misty Eyes Club'.
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
there is nothing but praise for this forum here, its owners and some members The recent one is about you, DG.
I wonder, when it will be coming to me, I suppose in blog nr. 163 of the suspicion theory, where all the anger comes from.
There is only one reason, why there is all the anger, plain and simple:
It's his personality and the way, he's doing things! {:)
As I said, extreme mania! He's also used some of my copyrighted material without authorization. I suppose I'll have to get a cease and desist letter ready.
This reminds me of that Frost/ Nixon movie. Now we see the extreme paranoia coming out. In his mind everybody is against him. Too bad the common denominator is himself. Some people should think before they blog. Poor, unhappy fellow.
DG
So, what sharp little eyes you've got...wait till you get to my teeth.
"People sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." Richard Grenier after George Orwell, Washington Times 1993.
Little boy lurker. If you have something to say why don't you face me here as a man in an open forum where your claims can be refuted.
I'm sure others have some things to say as well. As it is, nobody can respond to you.
If not, I regard you as that cold and lonely little soul known as a coward.
Now go type up part 11 post haste!
DG
So, what sharp little eyes you've got...wait till you get to my teeth.
"People sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." Richard Grenier after George Orwell, Washington Times 1993.
I understand perfectly, how you feel, but if you think about it, it matches perfectly to, what we already know.
I personally have changed in the last weeks:
These funny articles amused me to a degree, where even I can't bring myself to shoot some unfriendly salves into this direction.
It's too obvious and simply ridicoulos!
As I have said in another forum, the recent blogs have reached a degree of stupidity, that I only find them funny, nothing more.
Spinning stories and bending the facts in that way is something, that we well know here in Germany:
The last time, I have seen such obvious censorship and manipulation of facts was every friday afternoon 20 yrs ago, when East Germany was still existing. They had a program called "The black channel" where a downright communist agitated against West-Germany in a way, which has been pure comedy!
The best TV-program, that they ever made!
So, probably, we have a communist retro-minded , agitating wing in the James Bond watch collecting which prefers to publish in media, where a proper discussion is not possible.
I simply keep away from replying and leave him alone in his cave.
Hope, that you will see it soon that way, too.
President of the 'Misty Eyes Club'.
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
You are quite right. But I wanted it to be said that the person we are dealing with behaves like a spoiled child. Nevertheless, we don't want to debase ourselves by falling to his low level. So, point taken.
DG
So, what sharp little eyes you've got...wait till you get to my teeth.
"People sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." Richard Grenier after George Orwell, Washington Times 1993.
I think the emotional aspect of which is your first "fine" wristwatch ( as opposed to the 25 cent watches that can be had in those toy dispensing machines ) plays a role. I can't speak about anything Rolex, I can only speak about my experiences with Omega. Chiefly, its the first wrist watch I shelled out big bucks for.
Gather what you will behind that decision, coming from a way below middle class, first generation American born young twenty something year old man who has been kept in a dark cave about fashion/class lifestyle.
Add to that the classless taste of heavy jewelery wearing girly men ( so called rap stars ) that adhere to Escalades and Iced Rolex, and the Omega decision was plain as sight. Plus, the watch survives, its gotten beaten up with walls, a face, car doors ... all this has added a rugged sort of character. In a weird way, the watch is a testament to how I have lived for the past year and a half. And its resisted the abuse! I would think that definitely falls in line with the Bondian theme of living life strongly, and would need aritcles that can bear it.
The Rolex looks flimsy as hell, and could imagine an enthusiast Rolex person cringing at the thought of banging up their precious gem, forever babying it from getting a scratch = (
I think the emotional aspect of which is your first "fine" wristwatch ( as opposed to the 25 cent watches that can be had in those toy dispensing machines ) plays a role. I can't speak about anything Rolex, I can only speak about my experiences with Omega. Chiefly, its the first wrist watch I shelled out big bucks for.
Gather what you will behind that decision, coming from a way below middle class, first generation American born young twenty something year old man who has been kept in a dark cave about fashion/class lifestyle.
Add to that the classless taste of heavy jewelery wearing girly men ( so called rap stars ) that adhere to Escalades and Iced Rolex, and the Omega decision was plain as sight. Plus, the watch survives, its gotten beaten up with walls, a face, car doors ... all this has added a rugged sort of character. In a weird way, the watch is a testament to how I have lived for the past year and a half. And its resisted the abuse! I would think that definitely falls in line with the Bondian theme of living life strongly, and would need aritcles that can bear it.
The Rolex looks flimsy as hell, and could imagine an enthusiast Rolex person cringing at the thought of banging up their precious gem, forever babying it from getting a scratch = (
First, welcome to the forum. I think you expressed your reasons for purchasing your Omega quite well. I have several Omega's myself, only one of which is Bond related. For me, Rolex is Bond's true watch brand. However that won't stop me from buying another Bond Omega, but it certainly won't be a special edition. I don't think Rolex would ever issue a Quantum of Solace Submariner. Rolex is not into fashion or trends, they go their own way.
A Rolex watch can take a lot of punishment, just look at the COMEX Seadwellers and the Military Submariners. From my own perspective, I try not to beat up my watches including my Omegas. When I'm knocking around, I'll wear one of the watches I've designated my daily beaters. But hey, thats me.
DG
So, what sharp little eyes you've got...wait till you get to my teeth.
"People sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." Richard Grenier after George Orwell, Washington Times 1993.
I think the emotional aspect of which is your first "fine" wristwatch ( as opposed to the 25 cent watches that can be had in those toy dispensing machines ) plays a role. I can't speak about anything Rolex, I can only speak about my experiences with Omega. Chiefly, its the first wrist watch I shelled out big bucks for.
Gather what you will behind that decision, coming from a way below middle class, first generation American born young twenty something year old man who has been kept in a dark cave about fashion/class lifestyle.
Add to that the classless taste of heavy jewelery wearing girly men ( so called rap stars ) that adhere to Escalades and Iced Rolex, and the Omega decision was plain as sight. Plus, the watch survives, its gotten beaten up with walls, a face, car doors ... all this has added a rugged sort of character. In a weird way, the watch is a testament to how I have lived for the past year and a half. And its resisted the abuse! I would think that definitely falls in line with the Bondian theme of living life strongly, and would need aritcles that can bear it.
The Rolex looks flimsy as hell, and could imagine an enthusiast Rolex person cringing at the thought of banging up their precious gem, forever babying it from getting a scratch = (
First, welcome to the forum. I think you expressed your reasons for purchasing your Omega quite well. I have several Omega's myself, only one of which is Bond related. For me, Rolex is Bond's true watch brand. However that won't stop me from buying another Bond Omega, but it certainly won't be a special edition. I don't think Rolex would ever issue a Quantum of Solace Submariner. Rolex is not into fashion or trends, they go their own way.
A Rolex watch can take a lot of punishment, just look at the COMEX Seadwellers and the Military Submariners. From my own perspective, I try not to beat up my watches including my Omegas. When I'm knocking around, I'll wear one of the watches I've designated my daily beaters. But hey, thats me.
DG
So, what sharp little eyes you've got...wait till you get to my teeth.
"People sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." Richard Grenier after George Orwell, Washington Times 1993.
Agreed; those logo limited edition, numbered, buy now in 5 easy installments crap american marketing is the apex of tastelessness. When it comes to wearing it at least. I mean how ridiculous would it be if on screen DC would wear the omega in the limited edition 007 dial with bullet arrows or whatever the hell specs are. I have the plain version one, 2251.80. No logo, no signed by Mr Omega, none of that jazz lol = ).
I'll look at the rolex thanks. I guess its just me, walking down 34th street nyc, and seeing so many fake rolexes; When I see someone wear a rolex I just think imitation first.
( Speaking of Omega, I went back to check on the model number and this new one that popped up Deville in leather strap looks. Pretty. Bad ass for lack of a more sophisticated analysis. http://www.omega.ch/index.php?id=1307 )
Thanks! Someone once said that seeing the newest dive watches on older men looked really strange, like they were trying to hard to recapture their youth. Always felt the appropriate look was to pick up the sports/dive watch that was released when one was in their 20s . Looks balanced relative to ones age
For me, the literary Bond of Ian Fleming is paramount in the debate. It's Rolex.......
Just because Omega pay a small fortune to make "Bond watches", doesn't negate Rolex as THE James Bond watch as per Fleming.
Not trying to offend anyone, but I could care less what D. Craig wears in his private life (nothing to do with Bond) or what he's contracted to wear in the films (to the highest bidder- Omega).
Fleming determined who Bond is, what his likes are, what he wears, ect. I'll let the watch experts debate which watch is better. Although, I think that discussion has nothing to do with Bond........
This is where we leave you Mr. Bond. (Pilot, Apollo Airlines)
For sure Rolex would be "the Bond" watch due to Fleming saying it is, Eon just decided it was better to go with the company who paid them more and had a better product -- Omega
I understand that Fleming liked the Rolex or thought it was some "unobtainable", so made it "the Bond" watch.
The only thing is, who the f%k cares? Just read a book and it will tell you what the bond watch is.
Rolex is period, others can disagree or whatever. Its pointless as Fleming said Rolex.
--
I however personally think Rolex is ugly except for the SS or white gold date just on a bracelet.
But the Rolex of Fleming's time was a toolwatch and not what it has become in the last decades, something worn by used-car salesmen.
It's just the same as with Bentley - I don't think that Fleming would put Bond in a Volkswagen with Bentley logo which is just what Bentley today is. The Continental is just a Phaeton W12 (and the Phaeton not more than an XXL Passat) and is even built alongside the Phaeton in Dresden (I know, not every Bentley is built there, they still have the old Rolls-Royce factory in Crewe). Certainly not a car Fleming would choose for Bond today.
Regardless of what people think, it doesn't matter because what Fleming put down is BOND -- PERIOD. And the only argument with that is opinionated not factual and opinions don't matter.
And just as a datum, a Rolex is a luxury tool watch, specifically the Submariner or Deep Sea. Just like Omega is a luxury tool watch, specifically the PO and Seamaster.
But the Rolex of Fleming's time was a toolwatch and not what it has become in the last decades, something worn by used-car salesmen.
It's just the same as with Bentley - I don't think that Fleming would put Bond in a Volkswagen with Bentley logo which is just what Bentley today is. The Continental is just a Phaeton W12 (and the Phaeton not more than an XXL Passat) and is even built alongside the Phaeton in Dresden (I know, not every Bentley is built there, they still have the old Rolls-Royce factory in Crewe). Certainly not a car Fleming would choose for Bond today.
Rolex is still just as great a tool watch now as it was then. They're actually even better tool watches now. Why should it bother you that tools wear the watch now? Being a status symbol now doesn't make it any less of a watch. The watch hasn't changed, only the way people look at it has.
Better a tool with a toolwatch than a midget with a girls watch on the wrist
I can understand what RW means. The whitegold surronds, glossy dials, the many shiny surfaces, the many precious metal watches - all can lead to the assumption that Rolex went bling.
But in their core, they are even better than in the 60s, 70s, 80s 90s and 00s.
One thing which has not improved in my opinion are the metal clasps on the Oyser bracelets, I still prefer the tuna clasps.
President of the 'Misty Eyes Club'.
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
Comments
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
Yep, I think you are right, Rolex Milgauss.
DG
"People sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." Richard Grenier after George Orwell, Washington Times 1993.
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
Most coherent post that you've ever made
"Your contact?" "Not well."
As far as I know, they never did (L)ight (E)mitting (D)iode Displays.
If you are asking for Seiko LCD fans, I am here
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
http://commanderbond.net/article/6223
"The talk will be given by Dell Deaton..."
oh, I can't wait, which new "discoveries" are to come 8-)
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
Add to that the fact that the idea for the literary James Bond watch was postulated by M4tt in a thread over at Watchuseek before this individual published his article. Not to mention the fact that the individual in question was involved in that thread in a very negative and combative way.
The Connery gold watch theory was wrong! The first filmed scenes were filmed in Jamaica and only show the Rolex Submariner. The scenes with the gold watch that appear first in Dr. No were actually filmed much later at Pinewood Studios.
I also understand that this individual also got into a pissing match about a Moore era Seiko T.V. watch over at the "Nerd Watch Forum". One of our forum members here showed that his information was wrong. Rather than taking it like a man, and admitting his mistake, he became vindictive and spitefull.
In just about every forum this individual goes to, there seems to be a problem whenever the subject of Bond watches come up. I think the Bond community is beginning to learn that this person is bad news and not credible. It's also starting to spread to the watch community, albeit slowly.
If you've lost the Bond community, what's the point?
DG
"People sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." Richard Grenier after George Orwell, Washington Times 1993.
there is nothing but praise for this forum here, its owners and some members
I wonder, when it will be coming to me, I suppose in blog nr. 163 of the suspicion theory, where all the anger comes from.
There is only one reason, why there is all the anger, plain and simple:
It's his personality and the way, he's doing things! {:)
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
As I said, extreme mania! He's also used some of my copyrighted material without authorization. I suppose I'll have to get a cease and desist letter ready.
This reminds me of that Frost/ Nixon movie. Now we see the extreme paranoia coming out. In his mind everybody is against him. Too bad the common denominator is himself. Some people should think before they blog. Poor, unhappy fellow.
DG
"People sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." Richard Grenier after George Orwell, Washington Times 1993.
I'm sure others have some things to say as well. As it is, nobody can respond to you.
If not, I regard you as that cold and lonely little soul known as a coward.
Now go type up part 11 post haste!
DG
"People sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." Richard Grenier after George Orwell, Washington Times 1993.
I understand perfectly, how you feel, but if you think about it, it matches perfectly to, what we already know.
I personally have changed in the last weeks:
These funny articles amused me to a degree, where even I can't bring myself to shoot some unfriendly salves into this direction.
It's too obvious and simply ridicoulos!
As I have said in another forum, the recent blogs have reached a degree of stupidity, that I only find them funny, nothing more.
Spinning stories and bending the facts in that way is something, that we well know here in Germany:
The last time, I have seen such obvious censorship and manipulation of facts was every friday afternoon 20 yrs ago, when East Germany was still existing. They had a program called "The black channel" where a downright communist agitated against West-Germany in a way, which has been pure comedy!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYB29tBpZfc
The best TV-program, that they ever made!
So, probably, we have a communist retro-minded , agitating wing in the James Bond watch collecting which prefers to publish in media, where a proper discussion is not possible.
I simply keep away from replying and leave him alone in his cave.
Hope, that you will see it soon that way, too.
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
You are quite right. But I wanted it to be said that the person we are dealing with behaves like a spoiled child. Nevertheless, we don't want to debase ourselves by falling to his low level. So, point taken.
DG
"People sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." Richard Grenier after George Orwell, Washington Times 1993.
I think the emotional aspect of which is your first "fine" wristwatch ( as opposed to the 25 cent watches that can be had in those toy dispensing machines ) plays a role. I can't speak about anything Rolex, I can only speak about my experiences with Omega. Chiefly, its the first wrist watch I shelled out big bucks for.
Gather what you will behind that decision, coming from a way below middle class, first generation American born young twenty something year old man who has been kept in a dark cave about fashion/class lifestyle.
Add to that the classless taste of heavy jewelery wearing girly men ( so called rap stars ) that adhere to Escalades and Iced Rolex, and the Omega decision was plain as sight. Plus, the watch survives, its gotten beaten up with walls, a face, car doors ... all this has added a rugged sort of character. In a weird way, the watch is a testament to how I have lived for the past year and a half. And its resisted the abuse! I would think that definitely falls in line with the Bondian theme of living life strongly, and would need aritcles that can bear it.
The Rolex looks flimsy as hell, and could imagine an enthusiast Rolex person cringing at the thought of banging up their precious gem, forever babying it from getting a scratch = (
First, welcome to the forum. I think you expressed your reasons for purchasing your Omega quite well. I have several Omega's myself, only one of which is Bond related. For me, Rolex is Bond's true watch brand. However that won't stop me from buying another Bond Omega, but it certainly won't be a special edition. I don't think Rolex would ever issue a Quantum of Solace Submariner. Rolex is not into fashion or trends, they go their own way.
A Rolex watch can take a lot of punishment, just look at the COMEX Seadwellers and the Military Submariners. From my own perspective, I try not to beat up my watches including my Omegas. When I'm knocking around, I'll wear one of the watches I've designated my daily beaters. But hey, thats me.
DG
"People sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." Richard Grenier after George Orwell, Washington Times 1993.
First, welcome to the forum. I think you expressed your reasons for purchasing your Omega quite well. I have several Omega's myself, only one of which is Bond related. For me, Rolex is Bond's true watch brand. However that won't stop me from buying another Bond Omega, but it certainly won't be a special edition. I don't think Rolex would ever issue a Quantum of Solace Submariner. Rolex is not into fashion or trends, they go their own way.
A Rolex watch can take a lot of punishment, just look at the COMEX Seadwellers and the Military Submariners. From my own perspective, I try not to beat up my watches including my Omegas. When I'm knocking around, I'll wear one of the watches I've designated my daily beaters. But hey, thats me.
DG
"People sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." Richard Grenier after George Orwell, Washington Times 1993.
Agreed; those logo limited edition, numbered, buy now in 5 easy installments crap american marketing is the apex of tastelessness. When it comes to wearing it at least. I mean how ridiculous would it be if on screen DC would wear the omega in the limited edition 007 dial with bullet arrows or whatever the hell specs are. I have the plain version one, 2251.80. No logo, no signed by Mr Omega, none of that jazz lol = ).
I'll look at the rolex thanks. I guess its just me, walking down 34th street nyc, and seeing so many fake rolexes; When I see someone wear a rolex I just think imitation first.
( Speaking of Omega, I went back to check on the model number and this new one that popped up Deville in leather strap looks. Pretty. Bad ass for lack of a more sophisticated analysis. http://www.omega.ch/index.php?id=1307 )
6 years, one battery change later, in anticipation of the new movie
Just because Omega pay a small fortune to make "Bond watches", doesn't negate Rolex as THE James Bond watch as per Fleming.
Not trying to offend anyone, but I could care less what D. Craig wears in his private life (nothing to do with Bond) or what he's contracted to wear in the films (to the highest bidder- Omega).
Fleming determined who Bond is, what his likes are, what he wears, ect. I'll let the watch experts debate which watch is better. Although, I think that discussion has nothing to do with Bond........
I understand that Fleming liked the Rolex or thought it was some "unobtainable", so made it "the Bond" watch.
The only thing is, who the f%k cares? Just read a book and it will tell you what the bond watch is.
Rolex is period, others can disagree or whatever. Its pointless as Fleming said Rolex.
--
I however personally think Rolex is ugly except for the SS or white gold date just on a bracelet.
Otherwise Omega Planet Ocean 8500 for me please.
It's just the same as with Bentley - I don't think that Fleming would put Bond in a Volkswagen with Bentley logo which is just what Bentley today is. The Continental is just a Phaeton W12 (and the Phaeton not more than an XXL Passat) and is even built alongside the Phaeton in Dresden (I know, not every Bentley is built there, they still have the old Rolls-Royce factory in Crewe). Certainly not a car Fleming would choose for Bond today.
And just as a datum, a Rolex is a luxury tool watch, specifically the Submariner or Deep Sea. Just like Omega is a luxury tool watch, specifically the PO and Seamaster.
Rolex is still just as great a tool watch now as it was then. They're actually even better tool watches now. Why should it bother you that tools wear the watch now? Being a status symbol now doesn't make it any less of a watch. The watch hasn't changed, only the way people look at it has.
OY!!
Fair enough, Higgins is a tool, but the rest of us aren't... probably B-)
I can understand what RW means. The whitegold surronds, glossy dials, the many shiny surfaces, the many precious metal watches - all can lead to the assumption that Rolex went bling.
But in their core, they are even better than in the 60s, 70s, 80s 90s and 00s.
One thing which has not improved in my opinion are the metal clasps on the Oyser bracelets, I still prefer the tuna clasps.
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!