The James Bond films aren't actually spy films are they?...
JimmyBond0129
United States Posts: 263MI6 Agent
My brother thinks, The Bourne Identity was more of a spy film than the whole Bond franchise put together. Because Mr. Bond didn't do any "spy-ish" things. But that's my brother's opinion, it's not mine.
"I admire your courage, Miss?..." "Trench, Sylvia Trench."
"I admire your luck, Mister?..." "Bond, James Bond."
"I admire your luck, Mister?..." "Bond, James Bond."
Comments
Still and all, I think many of us would like to see Bond do more intelligence-gathering.
"I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
"Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
"I admire your luck, Mister?..." "Bond, James Bond."
If anything Bond is a superspy. I'm not talking about a Hollywood hyped super hero with a gun but an intelligence agent whose work is above and far beyond that of the normal espionage officer. Bond is more Navy SEAL/SAS commando/case officer than run-of-the-mill spy.
A spy could be assigned for years to a single case. He may spend his entire career in South America or Germany or Russia, buying information, carefully stealing secrets, providing safe houses for other agents, seducing, inciting, black mailing locals.
A spy will convince disgruntled natives to betray their country. A spy will arrange for the assassination of a politician or enemy agent. A spy will not drive a gadget loaded Aston Martin, start a firefight in the middle of a foreign embassy, abseil off the side of building in broad daylight with a beautiful woman in his arms or recover stolen nuclear weapons.
While Bond does some spying from time to time I would not call him a spy nor would I call the Bond films spy films. The Bond films are action films, thrillers with a "spy" background. Bond is an action hero. And that's just fine with me. -{