Toughest Bond
Feldmann1503
Posts: 3MI6 Agent
I always thought connery was the toughest because of his fights in from russia with love and diamonds are forever but after seeing lazenby in on her majesty's secret service, he was like a martial artist. also dalton and craig were pretty tough too i mean dalton beat up 4 men easily in a jail while handcuffed in the living daylights and craig fought two guys all the way down a stairway in casino royale. moore and brosnan i'd say were the least toughest cause moroe had a hard time in moonraker and brosnan had a hard time in tomorrow never dies. idk just my guess.
Comments
http://apbateman.com
http://apbateman.com
My ex once commented on his ju-jitsu moves (having got his green belt) and proceeded to tell me throughout the whole embassy scene whilst watching CR) )
http://apbateman.com
I honestly think Sir Roger was the toughest Bond, For putting up with Tanya Roberts, Screaming "James " Over and Over. )
(Connery) was tough and could throw a good punch any time. His fight with Red Grant in FRWL was similar to what Craig faced. But although tough I didn't think moved as well in fight scenes. I actually think Lazenby was a better fist fighter. Connery could scrap very well though. (Lazenby):-His fight in the hotel room was impressive and the way he beat up a guard at Piz Gloria was ruthless. It's very quick sequence but well done. He was very sharp & quick at fist fights. But 1 film only does restrict him a bit. I can't put a realistic case for Moore being the toughest Bond. We know it's not true. Moore could fight but didn't have the conviction of the others. (Dalton) is a real contender. He was more unpredictable than the other Bonds and had a brooding quality which the others didn't show much. Connery had it at times and Craig has elements of it. Dalton could scrap and was determined like Craig. I love it when Dalton punches Dario at the table in the bar. Dario draws the knife but Bond is ready & sharp, not having any of it. Also when he smashes that guy's head into the table & says quietly but firmly "he's had enough, run the tab!" He also beats up another man impressively in this scene. He also fought off the vicious jailer in TLD despite being handcuffed & hit hard in the back twice before this. Dalton could contain anger, but when he snapped or was pushed to it, he really let fly at villains. He also head-butted Dario later in film and also did this in TLD opening scene. One burst of energy I love from Dalton is TLD when Bond chases Necros after Saunders' death (although it's not Necros). You can feel the adrenalin from Dalton. I've often wished Bond could have fought Necros then. He would've beaten him up for sure or shot him without doubt. We knew it was too early in the film for this!
(Brosnan) doesn't have the menace of Craig and Dalton, but has his moments. His fight with 006 is brutal, in TND he fought off group of thugs at Carver's business. Also impressive is his fencing match in DAD. This had real aggression and Bond did well to win that.
Anyway my answer is Craig & Dalton equal as toughest. Brosnan is probably 3rd along with Lazenby and Connery. I would put Moore last of the pack. Connery had a tougher persona than Brosnan but wasn't better in fight scenes.
I enjoyed some of the fight scenes in some of the old films, but too often they were too well staged. I enjoyed it when Bond uses something nearby to dispatch the enemy (better than breaking his knuckles). However, I know that the reason they had Bond using his fists in the old films was it was standard stunt staging. I'm glad they are getting away from that with Craig and making it more realistic, as in real fighting it's better to not use the knuckles at all as they tend to break! People might think the "slap-block" fighting has not as much visual impact as a western style round up punch, but it's how real hand to hand is done - fast, disorienting and inflicting as much damage as possible to the enemy and limiting the damage to oneself. Krav Maga is the most realistic commando/street fighting taught today and it is surely what Bond would be taught.
You make some interesting points. However you must be one of the few people on the Planet that still believe that DC is 5 feet 11! A lot of debate ranges in the Blogesphere about it with a consensus suggesting that from the evidence he is probably a shade over 5'9 barefoot, and 5'10 in shoes, nearing 6ft with lifts (he is a notable lift wearer) where you are bang on though ,is that his lack of height is not a disadvantage in terms of hand-to hand combat. in fact I'd go further and sya it is possbily an advantage (lower centr of gravity, shorter levers etc)
He does appear tough and credible, but my concern is a little to tough, a little too skilled if that makes sense, as he never seems in any real danger to me. I prefer the notion of struggle and outsmarting an opponent that Connerry was so good at. Or the fight with 006 whre it is clearly not all going our boys way until the last moment when he pulls it out of the bag.
Roger Moore 1927-2017
I back Connery (1st four films) against the other Bonds - he moves light and easy, has size and looks strong. But in general (ie Craig) height really isn't an issue...
http://apbateman.com
And, your center of gravity is higher. Hell, strong winds threaten to topple me over.
Being tall is handy when it comes to intimidating people and charming women, but honestly, most days, I'd rather be 5'10 so I could enjoy a nice sports car without having my knees sticking up on either side of the steering wheel... and not thwack my head on low entryways and chandeliers.