A very detailed article from 'The Foraging Photographer' from the set at Hankley Common. Claims to have spoken to a member of the crew who revealed to him KEY PLOT DETAILS!
And if the Forager's claim is true, that crewmember can expect to be fired. Everyone involved with the production has to sign a non-disclosure agreement.
Some great footage of the Merlin test shots there. Wonder when we will find out about the logo on the fuselage.
They have the airspace booked for filming at Hankley from 10 Mar 2012 00:01 GMT TO: 26 Mar 2012 22:59 GMT according to the NOTAMS (these are special notifications issued to pilots to warn of dangers, military exercises etc).
Looks to me that its Silva's men, especially as the Merlin isnt wearing RAF roundels.
james362001Lancaster, California USAPosts: 338MI6 Agent
It's finally nice to se photos of Javier Bardem filming SKYFALL. Even if he is wearing a blonde wig to hide from James Bond. based upon all the behind-the-scene photographs I have seen so far and posted up on my Secret_007 Yahoo Group, I think we are going to be impressed with SKYFALL. We better keep Fandango in mind for this motion picture.
Things are shaping up rather nicely and there is reason for optimism. Having said that, it's one thing knowing plot detail but another actually seeing it executed on screen. And there is still a lot of detail that has yet to be revealed. Many prefer to avoid spoilers completely but I have enjoyed discovering the detail that has been revealed so far. There is a limit though, I wouldn't want to know everything.
Moore Not Less 4371 posts (2002 - 2007) Moore Than (2012 - 2016)
Things are shaping up rather nicely and there is reason for optimism. Having said that, it's one thing knowing plot detail but another actually seeing it executed on screen. And there is still a lot of detail that has yet to be revealed. Many prefer to avoid spoilers completely but I have enjoyed discovering the detail that has been revealed so far. There is a limit though, I wouldn't want to know everything.
I know absolutely nothing beyond the official blurb, which as we know is minimal. This is the first Bond film since Tomorrow Never Dies (that was because there was no internet before that!) I know nothing about at this stage and I'm thoroughly enjoying being in the dark, seeing the photos and not knowing the context really is firing my imagination.
Things are shaping up rather nicely and there is reason for optimism. Having said that, it's one thing knowing plot detail but another actually seeing it executed on screen. And there is still a lot of detail that has yet to be revealed. Many prefer to avoid spoilers completely but I have enjoyed discovering the detail that has been revealed so far. There is a limit though, I wouldn't want to know everything.
I know absolutely nothing beyond the official blurb, which as we know is minimal. This is the first Bond film since Tomorrow Never Dies (that was because there was no internet before that!) I know nothing about at this stage and I'm thoroughly enjoying being in the dark, seeing the photos and not knowing the context really is firing my imagination.
I absolutely respect your position and hope you thoroughly enjoy the build up and the experience of seeing Skyfall at the cinema. Casino Royale was the first film where I knew a fair amount of detail before actually seeing it at the cinema. It did not spoil my experience at all, I thoroughly enjoyed it. I knew nothing about Quantum of Solace before I eventually saw it on DVD (family reasons kept me from the cinema). I did not enjoy it at all. Now with Skyfall I am following the same path as Casino Royale. Does that guarantee I will enjoy it? Absolutely not. It's all about choice. If I don't like Skyfall I may well decide to choose your path for Bond 24.
Moore Not Less 4371 posts (2002 - 2007) Moore Than (2012 - 2016)
That sent chills down my spine. What a horrific villain. I don't know whether I can even watch this. I might have to retrun to my Twilight collection for solace (not Quantum thereof, I hasten to add).
That sent chills down my spine. What a horrific villain. I don't know whether I can even watch this. I might have to retrun to my Twilight collection for solace (not Quantum thereof, I hasten to add).
That's a little bit of a sweeping conclusive statement based on one scene where the villian is masquerading as something he's not. While the blonde hair wouldn't be my disguise of choice, I'm not going to be so dramatic as to damn the whole film into the bucket because of it...
I guess that if they build their own Scottish castle, they want to blow it up, right?
I've not always been a fan of blowing everything up at the end of a Bond movie.. I wish for once there wouldn't be such dramatic explosions and fire and he could just cleverly do something to end the bad guy..
If you can't trust a Swiss banker, what's the world come to?
I guess that if they build their own Scottish castle, they want to blow it up, right?
I've not always been a fan of blowing everything up at the end of a Bond movie.. I wish for once there wouldn't be such dramatic explosions and fire and he could just cleverly do something to end the bad guy..
Judging by the pics there are enemy helicopters, land rovers and soldiers everywhere going after Bond, wonder what the motive is since they seem to be chasing him instead of the other way round!!
I guess that if they build their own Scottish castle, they want to blow it up, right?
I've not always been a fan of blowing everything up at the end of a Bond movie.. I wish for once there wouldn't be such dramatic explosions and fire and he could just cleverly do something to end the bad guy..
Judging by the pics there are enemy helicopters, land rovers and soldiers everywhere going after Bond, wonder what the motive is since they seem to be chasing him instead of the other way round!!
He's able to blow up anything just by passing by. I mean, if I remember well, isn't Casino Royale the only movie where the whole enemy-complex doesn't blow up at the end?
If you can't trust a Swiss banker, what's the world come to?
I guess that if they build their own Scottish castle, they want to blow it up, right?
I've not always been a fan of blowing everything up at the end of a Bond movie.. I wish for once there wouldn't be such dramatic explosions and fire and he could just cleverly do something to end the bad guy..
Judging by the pics there are enemy helicopters, land rovers and soldiers everywhere going after Bond, wonder what the motive is since they seem to be chasing him instead of the other way round!!
He's able to blow up anything just by passing by. I mean, if I remember well, isn't Casino Royale the only movie where the whole enemy-complex doesn't blow up at the end?
The latest article from 'The Foraging Photographer' concentrates mainly on the efforts of the paparazzi to get pictures from the set at Hankley Common. And of the efforts of the security personnel to stop them. This article along with other recent articles are all on the same page and contain SPOILERS!
Comments
They have the airspace booked for filming at Hankley from 10 Mar 2012 00:01 GMT TO: 26 Mar 2012 22:59 GMT according to the NOTAMS (these are special notifications issued to pilots to warn of dangers, military exercises etc).
I absolutely respect your position and hope you thoroughly enjoy the build up and the experience of seeing Skyfall at the cinema. Casino Royale was the first film where I knew a fair amount of detail before actually seeing it at the cinema. It did not spoil my experience at all, I thoroughly enjoyed it. I knew nothing about Quantum of Solace before I eventually saw it on DVD (family reasons kept me from the cinema). I did not enjoy it at all. Now with Skyfall I am following the same path as Casino Royale. Does that guarantee I will enjoy it? Absolutely not. It's all about choice. If I don't like Skyfall I may well decide to choose your path for Bond 24.
Roger Moore 1927-2017
Daniel Craig - Photostream
http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Daniel+Craig/Daniel+Craig+On+Set+Of+Skyfall/oVzhkuXc805
Minor spoiler ahead.
http://www.mi6-hq.com/sections/articles/bond_23_report_mar13.php3?s=bond23&id=03110
http://theforagingphotographer.wordpress.com/
I've not always been a fan of blowing everything up at the end of a Bond movie.. I wish for once there wouldn't be such dramatic explosions and fire and he could just cleverly do something to end the bad guy..
Judging by the pics there are enemy helicopters, land rovers and soldiers everywhere going after Bond, wonder what the motive is since they seem to be chasing him instead of the other way round!!
He's able to blow up anything just by passing by. I mean, if I remember well, isn't Casino Royale the only movie where the whole enemy-complex doesn't blow up at the end?
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/03/05/article-0-1209211B000005DC-772_634x463.jpg
Like M5, I'm trying to avoid spoilers but I'm enjoying the photos
"If it's Bollinger 95 you were expecting me!"
I'm guessing you were going for this, and not your preparations for Eurovision
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2114557/James-Bond-star-Daniel-Craig-shoots-new-scenes-Skyfall-Lodge-Scotland-really-plaster-replica-Surrey.html
;% ;% ;%
I can't help it ... I'm really looking forward to Eurovision
(Less haste, more speed and all that .....)
reading about this falling cliff face at Dover
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/dover-cliff-collapse-sends-thousands-of-tonnes-of-chalk-rock-crashing-into-the-english-channel.html
SPOILER ALERT!
http://theforagingphotographer.wordpress.com/