What If George Lazenby Had Signed That Seven Picture Contract?

2»

Comments

  • zaphodzaphod Posts: 1,183MI6 Agent
    Craig : Just shut up and PAY ME! X-( X-( X-(


    Mmmmm...whether you like Craig or not I don't think he can be accused of not committing to the role once he had accepted it. True there was that bit of actorly snobbery in the beginning while he was undecided, but once 'in' I think he has given it his all. Independent of whether it chimes with you or not, he has not as yet 'phoned it in'

    That's why I think 3 outings should become the norm from now on as it allows for development and growth, but finishes before boredom is likely to set in. As films take longer to reach the screen these days it safeguards against the problem of a Bond who is too long in the tooth ( although I long for the fin de siècle world weary Bond at the end of his career which Dalton seemed to promise)
  • BIG TAMBIG TAM Wrexham, North Wales, UK.Posts: 773MI6 Agent
    I agree. The days when one actor does six or seven Bonds should be long gone. Best they do just three or four. It safeguards against staleness & keeps the producers' creative juices flowing. I think it was a brave move to replace Brosnan when he was still popular. End your time on a high... Okay, I know all about the wrath aimed at DIE ANOTHER DAY :)) but it was still popular with the masses.
  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy Behind you !Posts: 63,792MI6 Agent
    I always thought Five films was about right, giving an actor a couple of Films
    to grow into the character then, (hopefully) three good Movies were
    the actor can establish his take on Bond.
    "I've been informed that there ARE a couple of QAnon supporters who are fairly regular posters in AJB."
  • Moore ThanMoore Than EnglandPosts: 3,173MI6 Agent
    If you judge by box office then four films is the optimum. Thunderball and Moonraker were the most successful of Sean Connery and Roger Moore's eras. Roger's seven films were made in twelve years. The following seven films were made in nineteen years. That is very likely to be the norm from now on, so the days of an actor doing seven films are almost certainly over.
    Moore Not Less 4371 posts (2002 - 2007) Moore Than (2012 - 2016)
  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy Behind you !Posts: 63,792MI6 Agent
    In case anyones missed it here's an interview with Dame Diana Rigg on
    working with George. ( it's quite short )

    http://youtu.be/QiRaiidtTYQ
    "I've been informed that there ARE a couple of QAnon supporters who are fairly regular posters in AJB."
  • Shady TreeShady Tree London, UKPosts: 3,014MI6 Agent
    edited August 2012
    BIG TAM wrote:
    I'm going to stick my neck out on this one & say Lazenby gives a better performance as Bond in OHMSS than Connery does in YOLT. I'm aware of Lazenby's shortcomings. Some of his line readings are a bit wooden, but he has a good physical presence & should be commended, as a non-actor, for carrying a 140 minute picture virtually on his tod..

    I watched 'North By Northwest' at the BFI last night, the first time I've ever given Cary Grant a serious viewing. 'North By Northwest' has often been credited as an influence on the cinematic Bond (the most obvious Bondian homage to Hitchcock's movie being the sequence in FRWL where Bond is pursued across open ground by the SPECTRE helicopter), but what I hadn't realised until yesterday evening is that, in OHMSS, Lazenby's vocal performance as Bond (when George Baker isn't dubbing him as Sir Hilary Bray) is a pretty good and possibly intentional impersonation of Cary Grant's voice: the affected, semi-Americanisation in Lazenby's accent and the occasional hint of a lisp, half transforming 's's into 'z's or 'zh's, sound spot-on Cary Grant (at least as he performs in 'North By Northwest').
    Critics and material I don't need. I haven't changed my act in 53 years.
  • Shady TreeShady Tree London, UKPosts: 3,014MI6 Agent
    >
    Critics and material I don't need. I haven't changed my act in 53 years.
Sign In or Register to comment.