Question: What level of 'fantastic' is TOO fantastic for a Bond Movie?
chrisisall
Western Mass, USAPosts: 9,062MI6 Agent
Fleming's books were rather fantastic in their day, yet real life (the Cuban Missile Crisis, the international space station, the simplistic yet evil genius of 9-11) and motion pictures (YOLT, Firefox, Bourne) have pushed the envelope of 'fantastic' to a degree arguably past what Fleming envisioned, IMO...
So my question: Should Bond movies be in step with the ramping up of real & imagined threats & technologies, or remain rooted in the man & his abilities to overcome more straightforward (albeit 'singular') individual/organizational challenges as in the novels?
So my question: Should Bond movies be in step with the ramping up of real & imagined threats & technologies, or remain rooted in the man & his abilities to overcome more straightforward (albeit 'singular') individual/organizational challenges as in the novels?
Dalton & Connery rule. Brozz was cool.
#1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
#1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
Comments
realistic stories to a more fantastic storyline as the audiance tatses change.
The big sets and "World domination " stories from the 60's are fun but
are products of their time. Fear of commies taking over the world and all that.
My personal choice for a Bond story would be as pointed out by Virgil37,
" Improbable but not impossible " . I do feel Bond needs a little Bit of
"Fantasticness" Might be a great villians lair, or a frighting Henchman,
or a plot which will kill millions or destroy the west, or simply some amazing
stuntwork that you wouldn't see in another film.
Sometimes it can be the locations, Many action movies are based in America,
While Bond tends to travel the world adding to the feel of something a cut above
the average action movie.
As for the si-fi elements as in YOLT and MR. So long as its introduced in a
natural way to help the story, I don't mind. When you watch any documentary
on modern warfare, what we think off as si-fi already exists, so why not use it.
#1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
http://apbateman.com
(just pokin')
#1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
I agree that so long as elements are explained appropriately then I can usually accept them. I still think of it as a fantasy series in some ways and am willing to let the series get away with more than I would in other films. As long as thing's aren't pushed too far, too unbelievable or infeasible, then I'd say anything goes
#1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
You can blame the kid fans of 007 for that, the director of Moonraker himself said he was pressured into making Jaws into a good guy.
-Casino Royale, Ian Fleming
Bond fans all over the world at once : WHAT THE HELL WAS THAAAAAAATTT!!!!!!
Jaws finding love had already annoyed me. Drax shouldn't have let her come into space. I never bought Jaws becoming a good guy. He had already been portrayed as too much of a cold-blooded killer in TSWLM for me ever to accept it.
I blame the director for caving into pressure from kids - his own kids must have had him wrapped round their little fingers! I think it would have been far better if they had devised some magnificent way for Bond to kill Jaws (a mere physical fight could never have done it). A cool death would have made up ten fold for him remaining a bad guy
According to the cartoon James Bond Jr, Jaws eventually goes back to his killer ways. So i take it his relationship with that nerdy chick didnt last too long lol.
-Casino Royale, Ian Fleming
#1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
-Casino Royale, Ian Fleming
I think it would be:
FRWL
TB
OHMSS
TLD
LTK
CR
Sound right?
#1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS