That flashlight in the dark scene...(Are we still saying "Spoilers"?)
Smoke_13
Kitchener Ont CanadaPosts: 285MI6 Agent
Okay, so I've seen Skyfall a couple times now and I think I've seen how they tried to make an excuse for that terrible scene where M and Kincaid walk across the field with the flashlight on.
When Silva starts walking away from the house he immediately falls down due to the rough terrain. When Bond get out of the tunnel and starts walking he immediately falls down too. (Completely ignore the part two minutes later when Bond is running full speed through the same terrain.)
M is hurt - maybe the flashlight just had to be on to navigate this rough terrain with an injured person? Feeble yes, but I think this may be what the director was trying to use as an excuse.
I'm not just justifying it, the stupidity of seeing them using a flashlight when they're trying to stay hidden at night still irks me, however that has to be the reason. Thoughts? (I haven't stretched for something this much since I was 5 and mom hid the cookies on the top shelf.)
When Silva starts walking away from the house he immediately falls down due to the rough terrain. When Bond get out of the tunnel and starts walking he immediately falls down too. (Completely ignore the part two minutes later when Bond is running full speed through the same terrain.)
M is hurt - maybe the flashlight just had to be on to navigate this rough terrain with an injured person? Feeble yes, but I think this may be what the director was trying to use as an excuse.
I'm not just justifying it, the stupidity of seeing them using a flashlight when they're trying to stay hidden at night still irks me, however that has to be the reason. Thoughts? (I haven't stretched for something this much since I was 5 and mom hid the cookies on the top shelf.)
Comments
-Casino Royale, Ian Fleming
Diddums, dropped the rattle again have we?
Vive le droit à la libre expression! Je suis Charlie!
www.helpforheroes.org.uk
www.cancerresearchuk.org
I don't think this will ever cleared up to everyones satisfaction...my take..?...Kincade wanted to get M to safety as quickly as possible...perhaps he wasn't thinking quite straight after the shootout...?...but I think he thought Silva and his men might be more than a tad distracted by Bond than to look away from the building and why would Silva do that anyway..?..he wouldn't know about the tunnel would he...
But now He's just an Old Duffer, so using a torch is just what I'd expect from him. Hell
even Bond thought he was dead. I'd say Bond had him shipped to an Old Peoples Home
as soon as he could. )
M could have stumbled and yelled out in pain giving away their location to Silva. That would have been more effective than the flashlight/torch was.
There needed to be a certain amount of uncertainty about it all though. Will she survive, won't she? Etc etc.
Maybe kincade assumed bond and silva would be battling it out in the house, being as he bond and Emma took so long preparing it?
Who knows, but I like many were 'doing a mr 'odges' and couldn't help but think;
"PUT THAT RUDDY LIGHT OUT!!"
Vive le droit à la libre expression! Je suis Charlie!
www.helpforheroes.org.uk
www.cancerresearchuk.org
But with all the noise and commotion going on at the house... I doubt he would have heard her... plus, I think Sir M has a good point... Silva was distracted with all the commotion... so how else was the director going to make it obvious where Kincade and M had gone....??
Agreed a deeply flawed set up... BUT I'm not sure how else it could have happened??
where always doing that. ) or swooning, although you don't see
as much of that nowadays.
But then, If they continued to the church after finding the nickel it would have been a stretch. A true Scot would have spent another hour or two in the same spot just to see if there was another one lying around.
) ) )
Or wrote a poem about how lovely it was and that it'd only happen in glorious wee bonnie Scotland )
There again, if it'd happened in blighty, we'd have moaned it was only a quid. )
Vive le droit à la libre expression! Je suis Charlie!
www.helpforheroes.org.uk
www.cancerresearchuk.org
Bloody cheek! As A Scot I can confirm anything less than 50p, forget it! I wouldn't even stop. Plus there are no nickels lying around the highlands. Or lowlands.
I must admit, when I learned John Logal co-wrote this film (after I saw it) I immediately thought this might have been his doing, and was worried. Star Trek Nemesis had these kind of errors through its awful writing.
Hows this? - M has her mobile. Once at the chapel (should have been referred to a Kirk really,) she tried to use her mobile to call in the cavalry. - Silva, knowing M is the Queen on the MI6 chess board, has a scanner that detects her phone is in use, and locally too. The signal is not far - triangulating on the chapel. "Mother is calling home, time to interrupt her!"
Maybe a bit techy, but better than that bloody torch as a plot device! Plus I don't care if Kincade is 70 or 700. He would know better than to use a torch until inside the chapel and out of potential danger.
Kirkade is in on it with Silva. Or Quantum; 'they have people everywhere'. He deliberately uses the flashlight to alert Silva to their whereabouts. That's why Silva doesn't shoot him immediately on sight, he's on the team.
He also slipped M the fatal poison; Bond thinks she dies of the wound but she would have known how badly off she was.
Actually Bond was in on it too. Notice how quickly he closes her eyelids when she carks it! Very suspect.
Roger Moore 1927-2017
Yes, Kincade being an ordinary person in a Bond film (surely a rarity in itself) - he is not a professional gunslinger like James Bond - I think you've nailed the answer to this (frankly) pointless nitpicking.
Yes, he gripped that torch tighter than an Englishman playing a Scotsman gripping a five pound note!