Lotus Esprit Corgi Toy Cars - 3 from 1977 - value?
Silhouette Man
The last refuge of a scoundrelPosts: 8,851MI6 Agent
I don't often collect James Bond film memorabilia, but I recently purchased three different Corgi toy cars of the underwater Lotus Esprit from The Spy Who Loved Me (1977). One is a large-scale version of the Lotus with a back bumper that pulls out to reveal the underwater fins and back rotor projectors, the other two are Corgi Juniors, one with OO7 stickers, the other plainer and with none. Bought tghem in a second-hand bookashop - any idea of their value/rarity. I expect they're not worth too much, as they are bound to have been mass-produced, but I'd really like to know more about them, their variations and how many people here on AJB have them as part of their James Bond memorabilia collection?
"The tough man of the world. The Secret Agent. The man who was only a silhouette." - Ian Fleming, Moonraker (1955).
Comments
Noone will be able to give you a value without pics and more details.
Unboxed and used between Eur 1-12 each
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
Yes, these are unboxed and in none-too-perfect condition. The Lotus features still weork, though, which is always a bonus. I guess that they instead have sentimental value, at the very least!
The Juniors are original production, they have never been re-released after 1983. But in played-with condition they can be obtained for £1-2. One is missing its sticker, there were no plain versions - although a few can be found with a 007 tampoprint instead of a sticker, these are quite rare.
No, the back projectors (a technical term?!) are white on mine - you simply push the black grill on the bonnet and out they pop. There's also a button that does something on the roof of the Lotus where there are four holes. It' definitely from the tiome, given condition and how it looks - just a pity it's not worth a whole lot. Still, very nice to have all the same! Sentimental value, I guess as they come from the iconic Bond film TSWLM.
“It reads better than it lives.” T. Case
Yes, sadly I suspect that you're correct - they are all too common. First time I'd ever come across them in a second-hand shop, though. As I say, they have sentimental value for the James Bond fan!
http://thebondologistblog.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/kingsley-amis-draxs-gambit-and-reform.html
If your Lotus Espirit from 1977 was still in its original box, what would it be worth moneywise nowadays?
your questions are worthless until we see pics.
In general reissues have lesser value that the original issues, boxed models have higher value than unboxed models and playworn models have less value than perfectly mint models.
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
Right, well I'll try to get some pics uploaded on here, then. As you know, I'm rather new to this whole collecting thingymajig!
Rarely does a Lotus exceed £100, then it has to be in a box where the header card has not been folded over and the original missiles still on the sprue. (Original missiles are orange-red or pinkish red while those from the re-releases are deep red.) Usually even the better examples still go for well below £100.
The less common black/yellow/red 1981-83 box with separate - often missing - header card sells for higher prices than the earlier, more attractive film-strip box.
I find the reissues collectable, too. The first from 1997, no. 65001, includes a white-metal figure of Jaws; the 65002 from the Definitive Bond Collection range has a very nice box design but is the same model as before. The next from the Ultimate Bond Collection is not worth getting, basically the same model in a cheap looking box. Spyguise made a special version in a box with Jeff Marshall's great artwork. The Director's Cut range has a rather boring box design but the model itself has the propellers and many tampoprints added. The white plastic parts have a tendency to yellow on this model, though.
PS: I didn't want to correct you before but since you have it in your blog, too: it's Esprit, not Espirit. Just one letter - but you wouldn't write "Ian Flemming" either, would you? :007)
Sorry, I've now corrected the spelling in this thread and in the blog article. Thank you for all the great info, Wolfie!