Is there a canard that Pierce Brosnan wasn't a success as James Bond?

Silhouette ManSilhouette Man The last refuge of a scoundrelPosts: 8,871MI6 Agent
edited August 24 in The James Bond Films
It's just that in the New Dawn of the Daniel Craig era of James Bond films it feels like Pierce Brosnan and his four films as James Bond come in for a bad rap. I was growing up during this period and I remember reading magazine articles etc. that said that (a la Sean Connery in YOLT) Pierce Brosnan IS James Bond. Many reports also stressed that Brosnan was the best James Bond since Sean Connery.

So what's happened? Where does Pierce Brosnan and his James Bond films released between 1995 and 2002 sit with the James Bond fan of 2013.

I myself would have loved to have seen Perce Brosnan return for a fifth James Bond film, but post-2004 this seemed increasingly unlikely.

As always, I'd love to hear your views. :)
"The tough man of the world. The Secret Agent. The man who was only a silhouette." - Ian Fleming, Moonraker (1955).
«13

Comments

  • FiremassFiremass AlaskaPosts: 1,910MI6 Agent
    edited February 2013
    well, as i mentioned in another thread the Skyfall line about "not doing exploding pens anymore" seems to be a signal to the audience that the Brosnan era is not cool anymore.

    I'm still not sure what to make of the Daniel Craig era. I will always resent that Pierce wasn't allowed to do at least one more Bond.

    PS- a "canard" ? does this word still exist?
    My current 10 favorite:

    1. GE 2. MR 3. OP 4. TMWTGG 5. TSWLM 6. TND 7. TWINE 8.DN 9. GF 10. AVTAK
  • Silhouette ManSilhouette Man The last refuge of a scoundrelPosts: 8,871MI6 Agent
    Firemass wrote:
    well, as i mentioned in another thread the Skyfall line about "not doing exploding pens anymore" seems to be a signal to the audience that the Brosnan era is not cool anymore.

    I much prefer the Brosnan era to anything D. Craig has done thus far.

    Yes, perhaps Brosnan, like Lazenby before him, will in time be reappraised after 20-odd years after DAD. Coolness is exactly what I was meaning to say - Brosnan is no longer the flavour of the month, but he did sustain the series for ten years, to be able to pass the baton on to Daniel Craig in 2005.
    "The tough man of the world. The Secret Agent. The man who was only a silhouette." - Ian Fleming, Moonraker (1955).
  • always shakenalways shaken LondonPosts: 6,287MI6 Agent
    Brosnan, great Bond ,great actor,i was also gutted when he never got his 5th
    as one of our agents said in a previous thread,when another agent was knocking Brossers,he is an actor 1st and foremost,and is only doing what he is directed to do,
    how ever much he/we hate it ,
    By the way, did I tell you, I was "Mad"?
  • JarvioJarvio EnglandPosts: 4,241MI6 Agent
    I never thought Brosnan was that good really. He was ok by all means, but one of the lesser bonds IMO.

    As for the films, GE is the only decent one (in terms of bond films that is - I can obviously enjoy every bond film in general anyway though)
    1 - LALD, 2 - AVTAK, 3 - LTK, 4 - OP, 5 - NTTD, 6 - FYEO, 7 - SF, 8 - DN, 9 - DAF, 10 - TSWLM, 11 - OHMSS, 12 - TMWTGG, 13 - GE, 14 - MR, 15 - TLD, 16 - YOLT, 17 - GF, 18 - DAD, 19 - TWINE, 20 - SP, 21 - TND, 22 - FRWL, 23 - TB, 24 - CR, 25 - QOS

    1 - Moore, 2 - Dalton, 3 - Craig, 4 - Connery, 5 - Brosnan, 6 - Lazenby
  • davidelliott101davidelliott101 Posts: 165MI6 Agent
    I have to say that while Brosnan isn't my favorite Bond actor, he starred in films that exposed 007 to a new generation and it was while he was Bond that the dead franchise found new life. I didn't enjoy GoldenEye too much at the time (need to see it again) and Tomorrow Never Dies was a Moore era film, and Die Another Day started out great and fizzled out by the time they introduced the inviso car, I really enjoyed The World Is Not Enough.

    FWIW, EVERY Bond actor is "the best since Connery" when he is the current actor. I think EON could have rebooted the franchise with Brosnan at the helm. Craig plays Bond they way I have heard Brosnan say in interviews is how HE wanted to play the part, but he got saddled with the scripts he was saddled with.

    Since a canard is a false story about someone, I think that the fans are in love with Craig and, as Silhouette Man says, they are no longer in love with last years flavor and deem his tenure as a failure.
  • DutchfingerDutchfinger Holland With LovePosts: 1,240MI6 Agent
    To me, Brosnan was a huge succes as Bond! Growing up with Brosnan as Bond, in my eyes this man WAS James Bond. I still hold a little sentimental value towards him. His movies might not all have had the best scripts prior to Goldeneye, but Brosnan is always fun to watch. And to be honest, I don't think any Bond has ever looked as good and badass as Brosnan in Goldeneye.
    Craig plays Bond they way I have heard Brosnan say in interviews is how HE wanted to play the part, but he got saddled with the scripts he was saddled with. 

    Intresting. I think if Brosnan got the Daniel Craig scripts he would have been much higher regarded afterwarts... Brosnan is definitely a good actor who could pull it off. But of course Goldeneye along with TND and TWINE were some pretty fun 90'ies actions movies and a stable of their time. today, a badass spy with human emotions in a realistic world is hip, and about 15 years ago, a spy in a super boat on the Thames was badass.. The audience loved Brosnan. And much like the Connery and Moore movies, his movies should be looked at taking the time they were made in in perspective.
    Better known as DutchBondFan on YouTube. My 007 movie reviews: Recapping 007
    YouTube channel Support my channel on Patreon Twitter Facebook fanpage
  • lordofthejimmylordofthejimmy New YorkPosts: 34MI6 Agent
    That's just what always happens with a new Bond. Mark my words, Craig will end his tenure with a crappy movie and everyone will say "Oh he was a terrible James Bond, he was the worst ever! This new guy who's James Bond, he's the best!" And the Brosnan hatred will subside, and it will be okay to enjoy his films again.
    I feel like there's this high-school mentality about James Bond right now. "Oh everybody else likes Daniel Craig, so I gotta say he's the best ever! Oh everybody else hates DIE ANOTHER DAY, so I have to hate it too!"
    And after the dust has cleared, Sean Connery will still retain his rightful role as the best James Bond of all time.
  • Sir MilesSir Miles The Wrong Side Of The WardrobePosts: 27,940Chief of Staff
    That's just what always happens with a new Bond. Mark my words, Craig will end his tenure with a crappy movie and everyone will say "Oh he was a terrible James Bond, he was the worst ever! This new guy who's James Bond, he's the best!" And the Brosnan hatred will subside, and it will be okay to enjoy his films again.
    I feel like there's this high-school mentality about James Bond right now. "Oh everybody else likes Daniel Craig, so I gotta say he's the best ever! Oh everybody else hates DIE ANOTHER DAY, so I have to hate it too!"
    And after the dust has cleared, Sean Connery will still retain his rightful role as the best James Bond of all time.

    Only idiots and non-Bond fans will say that.... X-(

    Brosnan made some great Bond films....I don't need 'permission' to enjoy them...and since when did "everybody like Daniel Craig" ?:) Have you really read most of the posts on DC on here ? Did you not read the bile and vitriol that was in all the press - and all over the internet fan sites - when DC was announced ? I think you have 'selective memory syndrome'.....
    YNWA 97
  • Asp9mmAsp9mm Over the Hills and Far Away.Posts: 7,541MI6 Agent
    I enjoyed the Brosnan films apart from DAD. But looking back on them, the Purvis and Wade scripts were old and oft repeated. Pierce delivered these lines like an actor delivering lines he never believed in. In all they seemed contrived and quite awful upon re-viewing. Pierce also overacted quite badly in some scenes, especially with his hands. He was never a great actor and is in the Kevin Costner category. He held and shot a gun extremely badly, and it showed.
    ..................Asp9mmSIG-1-2.jpg...............
  • Q and MQ and M IrelandPosts: 171MI6 Agent
    I think that you have to give Brosnan credit. As you would know from reading my posts here, Timothy Dalton is my favourite Bond, but for various reasons his 2 outings didnt quite fit in the US. Brosnan and to a lesser extent Moore had cracked America before taking over as 007. I think this is why Bond became massive again. Following on from Remington Steele, Brosnan had a massive fan following which allowed the Bond franchise to market more in the US and to grow once more and become the franchise it is now and had been during the Connery era. Myself, i don't think Brosnan was the best Bond or even near(i rate Dalton, Craig and Connery at least above him) but as i said you have to give him credit for breathing new life into the franchise
  • Asp9mmAsp9mm Over the Hills and Far Away.Posts: 7,541MI6 Agent
    Oh yes, you have to give credit to Brosnan as he filled the role well for what people wanted at that time. Due to people wanting more intelligent writing, character development and more realistic action and acting, he could never fill the role today. The same is true for Uncle Rog. I love Connery as Bond, but he was never a great actor. Only two true actors have ever filled the role of Bond and that is Craig and Dalton.
    ..................Asp9mmSIG-1-2.jpg...............
  • Sir MilesSir Miles The Wrong Side Of The WardrobePosts: 27,940Chief of Staff
    Asp9mm wrote:
    Oh yes, you have to give credit to Brosnan as he filled the role well for what people wanted at that time. Due to people wanting more intelligent writing, character development and more realistic action and acting, he could never fill the role today. The same is true for Uncle Rog. I love Connery as Bond, but he was never a great actor. Only two true actors have ever filled the role of Bond and that is Craig and Dalton.

    Amen to that, brother -{
    YNWA 97
  • chrisisallchrisisall Western Mass, USAPosts: 9,062MI6 Agent
    Asp9mm wrote:
    Only two true actors have ever filled the role of Bond and that is Craig and Dalton.
    True as that statement clearly is to reasoning Bond fans, let's not forget the sheer cinematic fun we got from the other fellows! -{
    Dalton & Connery rule. Brozz was cool.
    #1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
  • Asp9mmAsp9mm Over the Hills and Far Away.Posts: 7,541MI6 Agent
    Absolutely. I grew up with Moore as Bond, and loved his portrayal at the time and still do. But, his acting wasn't great in the Bond films as he himself stresses vigorously. Roger Moore was capable of better, but Bond wasn't it.
    ..................Asp9mmSIG-1-2.jpg...............
  • davidelliott101davidelliott101 Posts: 165MI6 Agent
    FWIW, I saw a commercial on ABC this evening for the Oscar broadcast... it is featuring a salute to 50 years of Bond and they showed film clips (in the commercial) of Craig and Brosnan in the role.
  • RogueAgent007RogueAgent007 Corn-fed central USPosts: 154MI6 Agent
    I love Connery as Bond, but he was never a great actor. Only two true actors have ever filled the role of Bond and that is Craig and Dalton.

    What?! Are you serious with that statement? Do you have any idea what Moore's repertoire included before he was Bond? He has done Shakespeare, man! and had a very successful TV career as the Saint and on the series Maverick as well as others. As far as his Movie career, he did much more than just Bond. I found 'Crossplot' particularly entertaining(netflix has it)

    Have you watched Connery in anything other than Bond? One simply does not get knighted for being a bad actor. As for Brosnan, he not only could pull off ALL the action bits that Craig and Dalton could, he could show us the tortured, guilt ridden side of Bond. He could show us under the veneer to the dark soul beneath, a man who looks at himself and wonders how he became who he is! Brosnan WAS Bond, the only reason I rank him third behind Connery and Dalton is the writing he was stuck with. He played the character to a T, but you can only do so much with scripting like he had.

    As for Craig, many here know my feelings. I prefer Lazenby over Craig. Craig plays Bond ala Duke Nukem(First Person Shooter Video Game for those who don't get the reference, just wanted to go around shooting people for no apparent reason). He's just angry all the time. He can't hit the target so he's angry. His girlfriend chooses to drown rather than look at his liver-lipped ugly mug every morning...so he's angry. He gets shot off the train, so he hides on the beach, gets drunk, and is angry. There is no cleverness to Bond now, it's all "I will chase you and I will kill you...because I'm angry" He's angry talking to M, angry when he's driving down the road, angry even when he's walking on the beach! I can tell he's going for menacing, but there is a big difference between menacing and angry. There were a few scenes in CR that briefly gave me hope, but it's gone now.

    I'm so sick of people forgetting the power of Dalton's and Brosnan's performances because of media hype. Dalton was ruthless and angry when the scene called for it, but could balance it with the smooth, suave, sophisticated secret agent. And who would argue that Brosnan didn't look ruthless when boarding the 'Manticore' yacht and taking out that guy with just a towel. Yet he showed another side, too, which I've already discussed. Connery was the ultimate when it came to balance, deadly, grace under pressure, but charming and so very smooth. Craig is ruthless. He's a one trick pony, and I'm sick to death off it

    There I go again, sorry for the Craig rant, you were asking whether I thought Brosnan got a bum rap. Heck yeah, man! I wish he were still Bond!
    Beg your pardon, forgot to knock...
  • Nick37Nick37 Posts: 270MI6 Agent
    Brosnan's in 5th place. I do think that Brosnan had the props, but didn't get the chance, and if he'd had an opportunity to play the role in the way he wanted, I'd probably like him more. He's a good actor saddled in some scripts trying to lay on Bond cliche's. It's like they decided to try and totally break the mold with LTK, and when audiences didn't warm to it, at the earliest opportunity, they reverted back to the elements that made Moore's films so successful, with grandiose villains and over-the-top gadgets. They tried for realism to start DAD, and then shifted back to the OTT elements for the 2nd half of DAD. None of them are bad films, but they're popcorn-style. Look at the cool stuff and watch the explosions and don't pay too much attention to the believability.

    Have you watched Connery in anything other than Bond? One simply does not get knighted for being a bad actor. As for Brosnan, he not only could pull off ALL the action bits that Craig and Dalton could, he could show us the tortured, guilt ridden side of Bond. He could show us under the veneer to the dark soul beneath, a man who looks at himself and wonders how he became who he is! Brosnan WAS Bond, the only reason I rank him third behind Connery and Dalton is the writing he was stuck with. He played the character to a T, but you can only do so much with scripting like he had.
    "I've had a few...Optional extras installed."
  • chrisisallchrisisall Western Mass, USAPosts: 9,062MI6 Agent
    Nick37 wrote:
    Look at the cool stuff and watch the explosions and don't pay too much attention to the believability.
    There's a place for that sort of Bond movie IMO! -{
    Dalton & Connery rule. Brozz was cool.
    #1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
  • perdoggperdogg Posts: 432MI6 Agent
    It's just that in the New Dawn of the Daniel Craig era of James Bond films it feels like Pierce Brosnan and his four films as James Bond come in for a bad rap. I was growing up during this period and I remember reading magazine articles etc. that said that (a la Sean Connery in YOLT) Pierce Brosnan IS James Bond. Many reports also stressed that Brosnan was the best James Bond since Sean Connery also.

    So what's happened? Where does Pierce Brosnan and his James Bond films released between 1995 and 2002 sit with the James Bond fan of 2013.

    I myself would have loved to have seen Perce Brosnan return for a fifth James Bond film, but post-2004 this seemed increasingly unlikely.

    As always, I'd love to hear your views. :)


    Brosnan did not succeed because of poor scripting. Die Another Day was an embarrassing mess. The only Brosnan Bond that was close to being "flemingesque" was "The World is Not Enough".
    "And if I told you that I'm from the Ministry of Defence?" James Bond - The Property of a Lady
  • chrisisallchrisisall Western Mass, USAPosts: 9,062MI6 Agent
    perdogg wrote:
    The only Brosnan Bond that was close to being "flemingesque" was "The World is Not Enough".
    I see your point, but elements of GE & TND were as well IMO. Enough that I totally enjoy them, at any rate. -{
    Dalton & Connery rule. Brozz was cool.
    #1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
  • BlackleiterBlackleiter Washington, DCPosts: 5,615MI6 Agent
    Hold on there, now! Connery is certainly an ACTOR who filled the role of Bond. He blended the various elements of Bond better than any of the others (IMHO of course), and he made it look effortless. I'm sorry, but it takes real acting skill to pull that off.

    As for Brosnan, I believe he also a skilled actor and he makes for a credible Bond. Unfortunately, he was let down by his scripts and I think that's why his Bond films aren't better.
    Asp9mm wrote:
    Oh yes, you have to give credit to Brosnan as he filled the role well for what people wanted at that time. Due to people wanting more intelligent writing, character development and more realistic action and acting, he could never fill the role today. The same is true for Uncle Rog. I love Connery as Bond, but he was never a great actor. Only two true actors have ever filled the role of Bond and that is Craig and Dalton.
    "Felix Leiter, a brother from Langley."
  • Distorted HumorDistorted Humor Posts: 66MI6 Agent
    If anyone doubts that Brosnan would have a hard time playing a darker bond, his "Taylor of Panama" movie would put that worry to sleep.
    1 - GE, 2 - DN, 3 - CR, 4 - GF, 5 - FYEO, 6 - TLD, 7 - SF, 8 - FRWL, 9 - LALD, 10 - TSWLM, 11 - LTK, 12 - OP, 13 - YOLT, 14 - TB, 15 - MR, 16 - TWINE, 17 - OHMSS, 18 - TND, 19 - DAD, 20 - TMWTGG, 21 - AVTAK, 22 - DAF, 23 - QoS
  • raptors_887raptors_887 CanadaPosts: 215MI6 Agent
    He's my 2nd favorite Bond after Sean Connery. His first 3 movies are all good but they get worse as they go along. By the time DAD came out everybody knew that it was time for a change. Its probably best that he didn't over-stay his welcome like Connery and Moore did before him.
    1: Casino Royale 2: Goldeneye 3: Skyfall 4: Octopussy 5: Goldfinger 6: Tomorrow Never Dies 7: The World Is Not Enough 8: The Living Daylights 9: From Russia With Love 10: The Spy Who Loved Me
  • lordofthejimmylordofthejimmy New YorkPosts: 34MI6 Agent
    Sir Miles wrote:
    Only idiots and non-Bond fans will say that.... X-(

    Brosnan made some great Bond films....I don't need 'permission' to enjoy them...and since when did "everybody like Daniel Craig" ?:) Have you really read most of the posts on DC on here ? Did you not read the bile and vitriol that was in all the press - and all over the internet fan sites - when DC was announced ? I think you have 'selective memory syndrome'.....

    ROFL!!! What is with you dude? Do you get a hard-on telling me off or something...

    See I use these things called quotations marks "" which are used to mark the beginning and the end of a quote. In this particular case, I am quoting people who conform to this moronic high-schoolish superficial mentality of what's popular. In this person's mind, "Everyone" is a majority of people he or she want to be accepted by. "Everybody thinks this way," may not literally mean every living body in the known world. This mentality could be referred to as "Following the trend or fad." If a good majority of people say "Daniel Craig is the best Bond," (and you don't need to be a Bond enthusiast to know that a good amount of people believe that now, not before Casino Royale came out. If you don't notice that, you must live under a rock) then this shallow-minded person seeking everyone's approval will start to think the same way. Consequently, if "Everyone" (as defined by the shallow trend-follower) now decides that they don't like Daniel Craig, as they seem to feel currently about Pierce Brosnan, the trend-follower, not wanting to be discarded by his fellow peers, will follow the crowd and denounce Craig.

    This has been your English lesson for the day. There will be a quiz next week.
  • LoGabrielleLoGabrielle IrelandPosts: 111MI6 Agent
    I love the Brosnan era! When I was younger he WAS James Bond. That was just a given. Himself and his Bond movies will always hold a very special place in my heart. After Tim Dalton he is my favourite
    "You were fantastic! We're free!"
    "Kara, we're inside a Russian airbase in the middle of Afghanistan."
  • chrisisallchrisisall Western Mass, USAPosts: 9,062MI6 Agent
    I love the Brosnan era! When I was younger he WAS James Bond. That was just a given. Himself and his Bond movies will always hold a very special place in my heart. After Tim Dalton he is my favourite
    I love seeing love for Brosnan's Bond. Broz is my 2nd fave as well (along with Connery, but don't tell anyone I said that) behind Sir Tim.
    Pierce was deceptively smooth, then he'd break out with some rough stuff. The single best experience I ever had in the cinema Bond-wise was TND, pure delight front to back.
    Dalton & Connery rule. Brozz was cool.
    #1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
  • BarbelBarbel ScotlandPosts: 38,109Chief of Staff
    chrisisall wrote:
    The single best experience I ever had in the cinema Bond-wise was TND, pure delight front to back.

    That's two drinks when you come to Scotland!

    I first saw TND during an... unsettling period in my life, and for two hours was in Bond heaven. It reminded me of why I had loved 007 movies in the first place, and I still have a huge affection for it. Loved TWINE more, though!
  • chrisisallchrisisall Western Mass, USAPosts: 9,062MI6 Agent
    Barbel wrote:
    Loved TWINE more, though!
    His first three are still gold to me. -{
    Dalton & Connery rule. Brozz was cool.
    #1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
  • Smiert-SpionamSmiert-Spionam Posts: 318MI6 Agent
    Always used to love Pierce as a kid but have gone off him somewhat in recent years. I can't quite put my finger on what it is. Perhaps the fact that my favourite Bond (TD) preceded him may have something to do with it. I also feel he was slightly too smooth and too much of a pretty boy. More often than not he looks immaculate and I feel that Bond has to be slightly rough around the edges in keeping with the novel. Dalton, for me, got the look down to a tee.

    Maybe I'm talking rubbish. It's getting late and I'm tired. I'll try and explain myself better in the morning :))
    Smiert Spionam
  • chrisisallchrisisall Western Mass, USAPosts: 9,062MI6 Agent
    I also feel he was slightly too smooth and too much of a pretty boy. More often than not he looks immaculate and I feel that Bond has to be slightly rough around the edges in keeping with the novel. Dalton, for me, got the look down to a tee.
    Dalton was the one and only as far as I'm concerned, but of the fun cinema Bonds, Brosnan & mid-to-late term Connery are my favourites.
    Yeah, Broz looked a little squeaky sometimes, but it's not his fault he cleans up so well. :007)
    Dalton & Connery rule. Brozz was cool.
    #1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
Sign In or Register to comment.