PPK 7.65mmSaratoga Springs NY USAPosts: 1,253MI6 Agent
Ang Lee was considered back when Brosnan was still James Bond, so why not now?
I really liked his work on Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon and just about everything he has done since has been high quality. Ralph Fiennes is an interesting choice too, while I have not seen Coriolanus I would fine if he directed since he knows the actors and being from a theatre background proubly knows his stuff from a director's point of view.
I am not a fan of David Fincher, but otherwise, I think it's a good list. Of these, my choices would be Brad Bird, Rian Johnson, Steven Soderbergh, or Darren Aronofsky.
Soderbergh has retired.
I like Fincher, he has very good credibility. I also want to see Marty Campbell do it again, he nailed it with Goldeneye and well, dont need to mention Casino...
My first choice would be Brad Bird, though I think Paul Greengrass, Terence Davies or Steve McQueen (the director not the late actor) would all bring something different.
"Thank you very much. I was just out walking my RAT and seem to have lost my way... "
I would like to see someone with experience but a little unexpected. Ang Lee would be an interesting choice, but I would be excited with Peter Weir (Master and Commander, Gallipoli, the Year of Living Dangerously, Witness). He has a record of making crowdpleasers with a more substance than your average action film and has worked with some high profile names.
I think I would like Christopher Nolan to have a go and I wouldn't be adverse to Guy Ritchie either as he seems to have matured as a director ( and rediscovered his talent since ditching Madonna).
I wasn't impressed with Sam Mendes at all, so not too upset at his non return.
I wasn't impressed with Sam Mendes at all, so not too upset at his non return.
Thank God not everyone is praying at the SF altar. )
Some bits of SF left me yawning. Got a bit arty and clever at times which I put down to the director. Same with Marc Forster in QoS.
Bond is primarily an action series and I would like to see a director who's first priority was the action and not focusing on some wistful faraway look across a Shanghai skyline.
I wasn't impressed with Sam Mendes at all, so not too upset at his non return.
Thank God not everyone is praying at the SF altar. )
Some bits of SF left me yawning. Got a bit arty and clever at times which I put down to the director. Same with Marc Forster in QoS.
Bond is primarily an action series and I would like to see a director who's first priority was the action and not focusing on some wistful faraway look across a Shanghai skyline.
I understand the need for action...but without a storyline its pointless....and I'm happy with a bit of arty-farty stuff every now and then )
I wasn't impressed with Sam Mendes at all, so not too upset at his non return.
Thank God not everyone is praying at the SF altar. )
Some bits of SF left me yawning. Got a bit arty and clever at times which I put down to the director. Same with Marc Forster in QoS.
Bond is primarily an action series and I would like to see a director who's first priority was the action and not focusing on some wistful faraway look across a Shanghai skyline.
The "arty and clever" bits are actually what I loved about SF and QoS. I love it when directors bring an arthouse sensibility to genre films. (Examples: Wages of Fear, Manhunter, Drive, Hanna, The American, the Bourne Trilogy, Ghost Dog, Dead Man, Le Samourai, Le Cercle Rouge, and so on.)
—Le Samourai
A Gent in Training.... A blog about my continuing efforts to be improve myself, be a better person, and lead a good life. It incorporates such far flung topics as fitness, self defense, music, style, food and drink, and personal philosophy. Agent In Training
I understand the need for action...but without a storyline its pointless....
Please, don't call SF pointess. Sure, it's storyline was even thinner than QOS', but it had smashing dialogue, and was a rousing tale overall! Bond's don't always need a story to make sense- look at DAD, thick plot, fairly well structured, and the movie still came out rather a mess from lacklustre direction. Mendes delivered in that dept.
:v
For every complaint like yours about not enough action in Skyfall, there's one like this from a recent post:
"Less action and more plot. Recent films seem to bounce from action sequence to action sequence. The films offer nothing but. It is tiresome to the point that I wonder if 24 is really viable or desirable."
Apparently it's not only the case that you can't please everybody, sometimes you can't please anybody! 8-)
Bond is primarily an action series and I would like to see a director who's first priority was the action and not focusing on some wistful faraway look across a Shanghai skyline.
I understand the need for action...but without a storyline its pointless....
Please, don't call SF pointess. Sure, it's storyline was even thinner than QOS', but it had smashing dialogue, and was a rousing tale overall! Bond's don't always need a story to make sense- look at DAD, thick plot, fairly well structured, and the movie still came out rather a mess from lacklustre direction. Mendes delivered in that dept.
:v
"Felix Leiter, a brother from Langley."
Sir MilesThe Wrong Side Of The WardrobePosts: 27,746Chief of Staff
I understand the need for action...but without a storyline its pointless....
Please, don't call SF pointess. Sure, it's storyline was even thinner than QOS', but it had smashing dialogue, and was a rousing tale overall! Bond's don't always need a story to make sense- look at DAD, thick plot, fairly well structured, and the movie still came out rather a mess from lacklustre direction. Mendes delivered in that dept.
:v
Wow....let's take peoples words out of context to look clever 8-)
I expected better from you...I shan't make that mistake again.
YNWA 97
Silhouette ManThe last refuge of a scoundrelPosts: 8,844MI6 Agent
Time for the return of John Glen? :007)
"The tough man of the world. The Secret Agent. The man who was only a silhouette." - Ian Fleming, Moonraker (1955).
If Marc Forster gets anywhere near the next Bond, I'll be wrapped in
my Blankie, in a dark room, rocking back and forth, crying...............
.... " The Horror, The Horror "
"I've been informed that there ARE a couple of QAnon supporters who are fairly regular posters in AJB."
Comments
I really liked his work on Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon and just about everything he has done since has been high quality. Ralph Fiennes is an interesting choice too, while I have not seen Coriolanus I would fine if he directed since he knows the actors and being from a theatre background proubly knows his stuff from a director's point of view.
James Bond: Is Forster Set To Return As Director?
http://www.film-news.co.uk/show-news.asp?H=James-Bond:-Is-Forster-Set-To-Return-As-Director?&nItemID=18203
#1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
http://youtu.be/VFCM6TZgTMI "It's a madhouse !"
Soderbergh has retired.
I like Fincher, he has very good credibility. I also want to see Marty Campbell do it again, he nailed it with Goldeneye and well, dont need to mention Casino...
Oh hell no. He's directed the same movie 8 different times. I dont wanna see Tarantino jacking off to himself for Bond 24
#1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
I really love some of the movies he's done. I don't know why it seems like he always gets overlooked. Maybe I'm missing something ...
I wasn't impressed with Sam Mendes at all, so not too upset at his non return.
#1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
Some bits of SF left me yawning. Got a bit arty and clever at times which I put down to the director. Same with Marc Forster in QoS.
Bond is primarily an action series and I would like to see a director who's first priority was the action and not focusing on some wistful faraway look across a Shanghai skyline.
#1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
I understand the need for action...but without a storyline its pointless....and I'm happy with a bit of arty-farty stuff every now and then )
The "arty and clever" bits are actually what I loved about SF and QoS. I love it when directors bring an arthouse sensibility to genre films. (Examples: Wages of Fear, Manhunter, Drive, Hanna, The American, the Bourne Trilogy, Ghost Dog, Dead Man, Le Samourai, Le Cercle Rouge, and so on.)
A Gent in Training.... A blog about my continuing efforts to be improve myself, be a better person, and lead a good life. It incorporates such far flung topics as fitness, self defense, music, style, food and drink, and personal philosophy.
Agent In Training
:v
#1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
"Less action and more plot. Recent films seem to bounce from action sequence to action sequence. The films offer nothing but. It is tiresome to the point that I wonder if 24 is really viable or desirable."
Apparently it's not only the case that you can't please everybody, sometimes you can't please anybody! 8-)
Wow....let's take peoples words out of context to look clever 8-)
I expected better from you...I shan't make that mistake again.
#1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
For me my list is...
1. Christopher Nolan
2. Martin Campbell
3. Guy Ritchie...
...250. Michael Bay
....256. Marc Forster (Didnt mind QOS but dont want him doing another one)
-Casino Royale, Ian Fleming
my Blankie, in a dark room, rocking back and forth, crying...............
.... " The Horror, The Horror "
Don't get me wrong, I do like a story line too !! )
From that point, SF was very good. A coherent plot made a welcome change.
What I really didn't like was the Shanghai and Macau scenes especially Bond on the boat thing going to the casino.
All got a bit 'American Beauty' for my tastes.
Anyhow, just my opinion. All I know is that I much preferred SF once Silva came on scene and things picked up.
I think I would prefer a more action based director. I quite liked what Ritchie did with 'Sherlock' so at the moment I would give him a bash.
I LOVED the Shanghai and Macau scenes....and the boat scene too....I thought they were very Bondian indeed...and they looked spectacular....
I suppose it goes to show just how different we each see Bond and what we regard as being 'Bondian'.... -{
I don't often agree with Sir Miles ( as he's usually wrong ) But
I loved these scenes as well. -{
Crickey ! Makes me think twice about those scenes now )
You know I'm right really...soon I'll have you converted on QoS