Little niggles

12728303233

Comments

  • caractacus pottscaractacus potts Orbital communicator, level 10Posts: 4,140MI6 Agent
    revisiting my geographic niggle from Moonraker
    if he travelled up a tributary, he'd still be travelling against the flow of the river, therefor at the bottom of any waterfalls
    but maybe he started on a tributary, then got chased onto the main channel, then downstream?

    anyway, I see those falls aren't on any part of the Amazon at all, but a completely different river in the south of Brazil
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iguazu_Falls
    so I just assumed it was the Amazon, and I guess I also just assumed he was travelling upstream, from the coast, to some place really remote to find this plant

    maybe he started in Rio (that much is clear), he has to travel to get to Secret Service field HQ somewhere in the interior, i.e. a height of land (and its arid grasslands, not rainforest), then he travels downstream on this other river in the south of the country to get to the waterfall?
    actually that makes complete sense, now that I've thought to look up the waterfall

    and now I look at a map, Rio is in the south of Brazil, too, so I'm an idiot
    I just rewatched the film
    Iguazu Falls may have been where they did the photography, but in the field office scene setting up that sequence, Q and Bond are most definitely discussing a tributary of the Amazon. there is a giant map of Brazil behind Q as he talks, focussing on the Amazon, not the coast south of Rio, and when Bond states the name of the tributary, the camera zooms in on a tributary of the Amazon flowing from the south, deep in the interior, to end the scene. A very long way from Rio, and presumably from the field office (which is in arid grasslands, I would have guessed closer to the Argentinan border, not rainforest).
    So same niggle is back. Maybe they airlifted Bond's boat to the source of this tributary and he was following it downstream when attacked?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EN8avpXNASA
    I can't find the field office scene on youtube, but this clip of the boatchase begins a second early, showing the zoomin on the map but not the dialog. I think the river Rogers names is "tipparare" or something like that? its labelled in the map, but I cant quite read the spelling. Anyway, searching for that name in GoogleMaps, while focussed on exactly the area shown, just leads to suggestions "did you mean Tipparary?" (i.e. Ireland)
  • Matt SMatt S Oh Cult Voodoo ShopPosts: 6,616MI6 Agent
    Is Kara Milovy too naive and gullible? Bond can say anything to her and do anything right in front of her and she picks up on nothing. I think the character is supposed to about 5 years younger than Maryan d'Abo was, which might explain some of it. But she's the girlfriend of a KGB general!
    Visit my blog, Bond Suits
  • ChriscoopChriscoop Belize Posts: 10,458MI6 Agent
    Matt S wrote:
    Is Kara Milovy too naive and gullible? Bond can say anything to her and do anything right in front of her and she picks up on nothing. I think the character is supposed to about 5 years younger than Maryan d'Abo was, which might explain some of it. But she's the girlfriend of a KGB general!
    She's bordering on irritatingly naive at times, I've never been able to decide if it's intentional or how d'Abo plays it.
    It was either that.....or the priesthood
  • HigginsHiggins GermanyPosts: 16,619MI6 Agent
    Chriscoop wrote:
    She's bordering on irritatingly naive all the time

    fixed that for you! ;) {[]
    President of the 'Misty Eyes Club'.

    Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
  • Dirty PunkerDirty Punker ...Your Eyes Only, darling."Posts: 2,587MI6 Agent
    edited January 2018
    Higgins wrote:
    Chriscoop wrote:
    Her character has no purpose but to be irritatingly naive all the time.

    fixed that for you! ;) {[]
    fixed that for y'all.
    a reasonable rate of return
  • ChriscoopChriscoop Belize Posts: 10,458MI6 Agent
    Thank you Higgins.... What would I do without you ?:)
    It was either that.....or the priesthood
  • FiremassFiremass AlaskaPosts: 1,910MI6 Agent
    Matt S wrote:
    Is Kara Milovy too naive and gullible? Bond can say anything to her and do anything right in front of her and she picks up on nothing.

    Haha yeah, also I would think after nearly being killed in that little sniper incident, she would be like furious with Georgi. Instead she has no thoughts that maybe he wants her dead and is all excited at the prospect of Bond being a "friend of his"
    My current 10 favorite:

    1. GE 2. MR 3. OP 4. TMWTGG 5. TSWLM 6. TND 7. TWINE 8.DN 9. GF 10. AVTAK
  • FiremassFiremass AlaskaPosts: 1,910MI6 Agent
    Goldeneye:

    Bond saves the day in the helicopter trap and then is super kind towards Natalya. "Here let me help you out" and she like kicks him in the shin and runs away. What was that all about? It's not like in Spectre where Swann was understandably upset that Bond almost got her killed in the chase.

    Reminds me of in Goldfinger where Bond is like, "I know what they did to your sister in Miami and I can help you." and Jill is like "No you don't! Let go of me!" and puts up a big struggle.

    Why are they making these women so hostile? It doesn't make them seem tougher, just stupider.

    I also feel that Natalya could have given Bond a little more complete report on the insider. She mentions Boris, but not Ourumov.
    Perhaps she was nervous about naming a top ranking General but still...it seemed like she trusted Bond at that point.
    My current 10 favorite:

    1. GE 2. MR 3. OP 4. TMWTGG 5. TSWLM 6. TND 7. TWINE 8.DN 9. GF 10. AVTAK
  • BarbelBarbel ScotlandPosts: 38,078Chief of Staff
    Firemass wrote:

    Reminds me of in Goldfinger where Bond is like, "I know what they did to your sister in Miami and I can help you." and Jill is like "No you don't! Let go of me!" and puts up a big struggle.

    It's Tilly rather than Jill, and being a lesbian (made clear in the book, though not the film) she presumably doesn't like being handled by a man.
  • FiremassFiremass AlaskaPosts: 1,910MI6 Agent
    Barbel wrote:
    Firemass wrote:

    Reminds me of in Goldfinger where Bond is like, "I know what they did to your sister in Miami and I can help you." and Jill is like "No you don't! Let go of me!" and puts up a big struggle.

    It's Tilly rather than Jill, and being a lesbian (made clear in the book, though not the film) she presumably doesn't like being handled by a man.

    Right idea, wrong pussy. I knew I should have double checked that one.
    My current 10 favorite:

    1. GE 2. MR 3. OP 4. TMWTGG 5. TSWLM 6. TND 7. TWINE 8.DN 9. GF 10. AVTAK
  • FiremassFiremass AlaskaPosts: 1,910MI6 Agent
    Die Another Day:


    - M says Bond's freedom came at too high a price? C'mon Bond is worth at least a 100 Zaos.

    - In Cuba, Bond says he needs a fast car and Raoul laughs and nods. Next we see Bond in a 1957 Ford Fairlane.
    To me it doesn't seem like this car is particularly fast or particularly slow...it's just a cool classic car. So I don't get the joke why Raoul was so smirky.

    - Zao says "But the lasers are real" and then the next time we see Jinx she is unconscious. Did she faint?
    Why did Zao boast about the lasers if he planned to shoot her? It was actually Mr. Kil who insisted on using the laser.
    My current 10 favorite:

    1. GE 2. MR 3. OP 4. TMWTGG 5. TSWLM 6. TND 7. TWINE 8.DN 9. GF 10. AVTAK
  • Dirty PunkerDirty Punker ...Your Eyes Only, darling."Posts: 2,587MI6 Agent
    "But the lasers...are CGI"
    a reasonable rate of return
  • heartbroken_mr_draxheartbroken_mr_drax New Zealand Posts: 2,073MI6 Agent
    "But the lasers...are CGI"

    :))
    1. TWINE 2. FYEO 3. MR 4. TLD 5. TSWLM 6. OHMSS 7. DN 8. OP 9. AVTAK 10. TMWTGG 11. QoS 12. GE 13. CR 14. TB 15. FRWL 16. TND 17. LTK 18. GF 19. SF 20. LaLD 21. YOLT 22. NTTD 23. DAD 24. DAF. 25. SP

    "Better make that two."
  • FiremassFiremass AlaskaPosts: 1,910MI6 Agent
    Recently someone questioned the parahawk scene in TWINE being a plot hole, because since Elektra was revealed to be a bad guy then there's no way Renard would risk killing her in such an attack.

    However, after rewatching TWINE last night I can safely say that this was not a plot hole. Elektra was never really in much danger since they split up as soon as the parahawks appeared and they only targeted Bond. Renard said as much later at their mission debriefing where it was clear that Bond was the target. Meanwhile, Elektra puts her own spin on it that the parahawks were trying to kill her.

    I admit it was still risky as she was caught in an avalanche, but the attack and plot twist was hardly unexplained or overlooked by the filmmakers. Unlike say, Goldeneye, where it is NEVER explained how Ouromov managed to fake kill 006.
    My current 10 favorite:

    1. GE 2. MR 3. OP 4. TMWTGG 5. TSWLM 6. TND 7. TWINE 8.DN 9. GF 10. AVTAK
  • Wint and Kidd far-outWint and Kidd far-out AustraliaPosts: 109MI6 Agent
    Firemass wrote:
    I admit it was still risky as she was caught in an avalanche, but the attack and plot twist was hardly unexplained or overlooked by the filmmakers. Unlike say, Goldeneye, where it is NEVER explained how Ouromov managed to fake kill 006.

    That truly is a tough one. I read somewhere once online that the audience, in addition to Bond, assume the shooting to be real at first. The main explanation is that obviously Ouromov was using a gun filled with blanks. However the big difficulty is that even a blank bullet will still be fatal if fired in such close proximity to the head as seen in the scene. Something about shrapnel from the exploding blank cartridge getting embedded into the unfortunate person. I forget the details but the gist is something like that.
    Roger Moore is my favourite 007 R.I.P.
  • Dirty PunkerDirty Punker ...Your Eyes Only, darling."Posts: 2,587MI6 Agent
    That truly is a tough one. I read somewhere once online that the audience, in addition to Bond, assume the shooting to be real at first. The main explanation is that obviously Ouromov  was using a gun filled with blanks. However the big difficulty is that even a blank bullet will still be fatal if fired in such close proximity to the head as seen in the scene. Something about shrapnel from the exploding blank cartridge getting embedded into the unfortunate person. I forget the details but the gist is something like that.
    I always assumed they used the loudspeakers from their raves to mimic a gunshot.
    :D

    Still, no brain matter or blood appears.
    a reasonable rate of return
  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy Behind you !Posts: 63,792MI6 Agent
    The bullet was on a rubber band which pulled it
    Quickly back in to the barrel ;)
    "I've been informed that there ARE a couple of QAnon supporters who are fairly regular posters in AJB."
  • Matt SMatt S Oh Cult Voodoo ShopPosts: 6,616MI6 Agent
    Still, no brain matter or blood appears.

    If no brain matter or blood appears when someone is shot, does that mean there are a lot fewer deaths in the Bond films than we are lead to believe?
    Visit my blog, Bond Suits
  • Dirty PunkerDirty Punker ...Your Eyes Only, darling."Posts: 2,587MI6 Agent
    Matt S wrote:
    Still, no brain matter or blood appears.

    If no brain matter or blood appears when someone is shot, does that mean there are a lot fewer deaths in the Bond films than we are lead to believe?
    Well, I find some error in my logic but not everyone is shot point blank with a headshot.

    For example in Octopussy when he shot the guard that intervened in his conversation with Orlov, he at least had blood right between the eyes.
    a reasonable rate of return
  • walther p99walther p99 NJPosts: 3,416MI6 Agent
    Firemass wrote:
    I admit it was still risky as she was caught in an avalanche, but the attack and plot twist was hardly unexplained or overlooked by the filmmakers. Unlike say, Goldeneye, where it is NEVER explained how Ouromov managed to fake kill 006.

    That truly is a tough one. I read somewhere once online that the audience, in addition to Bond, assume the shooting to be real at first. The main explanation is that obviously Ouromov was using a gun filled with blanks. However the big difficulty is that even a blank bullet will still be fatal if fired in such close proximity to the head as seen in the scene. Something about shrapnel from the exploding blank cartridge getting embedded into the unfortunate person. I forget the details but the gist is something like that.
    Not to mention he shoots one of his own soldiers moments earlier who presumably wasn't faking it.
  • Dirty PunkerDirty Punker ...Your Eyes Only, darling."Posts: 2,587MI6 Agent
    Maybe the screenwriters thought blanks worked the same way they did in Die Hard 2.
    a reasonable rate of return
  • Number24Number24 NorwayPosts: 22,425MI6 Agent
    Oromov could simply had moved the gun some inches to the side. It would have looked real from a distanse and seen only in a split second.
  • sniperUKsniperUK UlsterPosts: 594MI6 Agent
    Number24 wrote:
    Oromov could simply had moved the gun some inches to the side. It would have looked real from a distanse and seen only in a split second.

    And Alecs ear would still be ringing :))
  • ChriscoopChriscoop Belize Posts: 10,458MI6 Agent
    sniperUK wrote:
    Number24 wrote:
    Oromov could simply had moved the gun some inches to the side. It would have looked real from a distanse and seen only in a split second.

    And Alecs ear would still be ringing :))
    :)) ringing or perforated! Have you heard the noise those maks make!
    It was either that.....or the priesthood
  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy Behind you !Posts: 63,792MI6 Agent
    Most likely planned in advance with a fake arm behind his back, allowing him
    to stick a finger in his ear. ;) and after all This is Sean Bean we're taking about.
    "I've been informed that there ARE a couple of QAnon supporters who are fairly regular posters in AJB."
  • sniperUKsniperUK UlsterPosts: 594MI6 Agent
    Chriscoop wrote:
    sniperUK wrote:
    Number24 wrote:
    Oromov could simply had moved the gun some inches to the side. It would have looked real from a distanse and seen only in a split second.

    And Alecs ear would still be ringing :))
    :)) ringing or perforated! Have you heard the noise those maks make!

    Could be worse, could be my .44 :D
  • Number24Number24 NorwayPosts: 22,425MI6 Agent
    It's just a movie, people :v
  • FiremassFiremass AlaskaPosts: 1,910MI6 Agent
    Maybe the screenwriters thought blanks worked the same way they did in Die Hard 2.

    I was gonna mention DH2 being an example. In the movie world: blanks=harmless

    However, Goldeneye doesn’t allow the blank theory to seem plausible due to Ourmov killing that guard in the same scene.

    What really niggles me though is Bond never asks 006 about this little incident. “But Alec, I watched you die. How???” This question never even occurs to Bond for some reason.

    Compare this to Moonraker where Bond asks Drax about why he hijacked his own shuttle in midair.
    How could Goldeneye overlook such an important detail?
    My current 10 favorite:

    1. GE 2. MR 3. OP 4. TMWTGG 5. TSWLM 6. TND 7. TWINE 8.DN 9. GF 10. AVTAK
  • caractacus pottscaractacus potts Orbital communicator, level 10Posts: 4,140MI6 Agent
    There is a completely logical explanation: Alec had a plastic surgery double.
    As I recall Bond had got separated from Alec, then next thing, he saw Alec captured with a gun to his head.
    Probably the real Alec was hiding in the shadows, while his plastic surgery double, who'd been at the dam complex with the soviets all along, took the bullet.
    After all, as a DoubleOh, Alec had access to all the case files and had been reading up on the diamond caper.
    He had reason to read that file in particular, as he was already planning his own Evil Satellite, and wanted to research how others had tried to do that sort of scheme before him ... that's when Alec saw Blofeld had two plastic surgery doubles killed in that precredits sequence, and Bond never suspected the real Blofeld was still alive til halfway through the mission.
    If I was an aspiring evil megalomaniac with a job in the DoubleOh office, I'd sure as heck be reading the old case files for inspiration.
    Firemass wrote:
    What really niggles me though is Bond never asks 006 about this little incident. “But Alec, I watched you die. How???” This question never even occurs to Bond for some reason.
    yes that really should have been an obvious topic of conversation. I think BrosnanBond just wasn't as clever as MooreBond, who was the smartest of all the Bonds. I bet MooreBond would never have been fooled by any of the rather obvious plot-twists in the Brosnan-era movies.

    Firemass wrote:
    Elektra was never really in much danger since they split up as soon as the parahawks appeared and they only targeted Bond. Renard said as much later at their mission debriefing where it was clear that Bond was the target. Meanwhile, Elektra puts her own spin on it that the parahawks were trying to kill her.
    thanks for checking into this. I still think the whole operation looked complex, expensive, and almost as inefficient as the hearse/gondola assassination attempt in Moonraker. And as noted a few pages back, Bonds decision to accompany Elektra on the ski-hill was literally last minute.
    (I'm surprised the skis he grabbed even fit, he didn't stop to check them. Even LazenbyBond was smarter!)

    Number24 wrote:
    It's just a movie, people
    nooo, blasphemy!!! what are you, some kind of radical real-life-er?
  • BarbelBarbel ScotlandPosts: 38,078Chief of Staff
    Number24 wrote:
    It's just a movie, people
    nooo, blasphemy!!! what are you, some kind of radical real-life-er?

    :)) :)) :))
Sign In or Register to comment.