FS: £3200 TOM FORD Regency suit

Medtner1

For very reluctant sale is an extremely rare Regency suit by Tom Ford as worn by Daniel Craig in the previous Bond. Size is 48 IT or 38 UK/US. (Trousers fit 30-32 as they have lovely side adjusters. Suit is nearly new as I've only worn it once. There's enough (pictures below) hand stitching to make it a piece of art rather than a garment. Colour is charcoal/very dark grey. Fabric is a ridiculously fine wool.

RRP £3200

Asking for £1650. Comes with TOM FORD suit hanger, suit carrier and serious sex appeal.

Higgins

Welcome to AJB.
Please check this
http://www.ajb007.co.uk/topic/45180/introduction-how-to-use-the-forum/

Particularly the parts about selling stuff and linking to full size pics

Medtner1

Aha so shall I remove the pictures and link to them? Cheers

Sir Miles

Medtner1 wrote:

Aha so shall I remove the pictures and link to them? Cheers

No...I think he was was referring to the fact the pics are thumbnail size only... -{

Medtner1

Aha, even when you click on em? uploaded them from my phone. Will re upload again tonight..! Cheers

Matt S

Medtner1 wrote:

Aha, even when you click on em? uploaded them from my phone. Will re upload again tonight..! Cheers

He doesn't want to have to click on them to see full size. He wants the full size photos to appear on the page here. It actually works better for me to have clickable thumbnails since it helps the page here load faster, and I don't have to load large photos if I don't want to. Sometimes my internet connection can be slow and it just lags my whole computer to load large images I don't want to. But the former is unfortunately the policy here.

Sir Miles

Matt S wrote:

It actually works better for me to have clickable thumbnails since it helps the page here load faster, and I don't have to load large photos if I don't want to. Sometimes my internet connection can be slow and it just lags my whole computer to load large images I don't want to. But the former is unfortunately the policy here.

Is it the policy here ?:)

Matt S

Sir Miles wrote:

Matt S wrote:

It actually works better for me to have clickable thumbnails since it helps the page here load faster, and I don't have to load large photos if I don't want to. Sometimes my internet connection can be slow and it just lags my whole computer to load large images I don't want to. But the former is unfortunately the policy here.

Is it the policy here ?:)

Is that guide not actually a guide?

Sir Miles

Matt S wrote:

Sir Miles wrote:

Matt S wrote:

It actually works better for me to have clickable thumbnails since it helps the page here load faster, and I don't have to load large photos if I don't want to. Sometimes my internet connection can be slow and it just lags my whole computer to load large images I don't want to. But the former is unfortunately the policy here.

Is it the policy here ?:)

Is that guide not actually a guide?

A guide is a guide...not a policy...it's there to help...hopefully...

Medtner1

Aha thanks in that case I will keep them as is! Hope you enjoy and thanks for feedbac\k

Matt S

Sir Miles wrote:

Matt S wrote:

Sir Miles wrote:

Is it the policy here ?:)

Is that guide not actually a guide?

A guide is a guide...not a policy...it's there to help...hopefully...

Thanks. Now I feel better about disagreeing with Higgins on that.

Higgins

the issue of the page not loading fast enough is minimal here in my experience - unless people link to 10 MB pics directly from their camera.
Which is in a similar league like plastering the forum with thumbnails.
Remember that you are posting something that you want others to read and see - if you are using >3 thumbnails, things are getting slow and annoying (ads and new windows) for everyone who wants to follow what you are writing.

If you are just posting there to express yourself without caring how others can follow it - power to you and your beloved thumbnails.

Just wanted to add: If I am selling something, I make sure that people are able to see full pics in the ad - unless I have something to hide

Matt S

Higgins wrote:

the issue of the page not loading fast enough is minimal here in my experience - unless people link to 10 MB pics directly from their camera.
Which is in a similar league like plastering the forum with thumbnails.
Remember that you are posting something that you want others to read and see - if you are using >3 thumbnails, things are getting slow and annoying (ads and new windows) for everyone who wants to follow what you are writing.

If you are just posting there to express yourself without caring how others can follow it - power to you and your beloved thumbnails.

Just wanted to add: If I am selling something, I make sure that people are able to see full pics in the ad - unless I have something to hide

You make a good point from the poster's perspective of wanting people to see the full image. But from the user's perspective, I like to have control over what I load. The images here total a few megabytes in size. At that size I much prefer thumbnails, especially with my internet and computer. I did click on these thumbnails because I wanted to look at the suit. But unlike you, ads don't come up when I click the photos. I actually prefer the new windows.

Higgins

on the bottom of the new window, you get tons of ads!
And on my mobile devices (iPhone and iPad), I am even getting an ad message before I can see the pic 8-)

My credo here is to share information.
As a pic says often more than a tousand words, it's out of the question for me to upload filesize-optimized full pics.

Sir Miles

Matt S wrote:

Sir Miles wrote:

Matt S wrote:

Is that guide not actually a guide?

A guide is a guide...not a policy...it's there to help...hopefully...

Thanks. Now I feel better about disagreeing with Higgins on that.

No bother...we ALL disagree with him all the time anyway )

Higgins

... because you all are wrong! :v

Medtner1

thanks for the (lots) of feedback again! -{

Medtner1

Back from travelling and this is on the market again!!