Does Moonraker (Novel) dispell any notion Bond Novels are misogynistic

perdoggperdogg Posts: 432MI6 Agent
I am listening to the MR audiobook and it quite clear that Gala Brand is more than any sex object.

1. She is a policewoman. Capable of operating in the field. In Fact, Bond's initial reaction to her was different from his reaction to Vesper Lynd.

2. She is resourceful. She was able to get through the captivity of Drax and Krebbs with poise.

3. She is obviously capable of working in the scientific field and extremely adaptable.
"And if I told you that I'm from the Ministry of Defence?" James Bond - The Property of a Lady

Comments

  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy Behind you !Posts: 63,792MI6 Agent
    I always found that Fleming usually wrote very strong female characters.
    Yes they might need Bond's help, but they were all very modern women
    for their time. It was the films that made them sex objects, and toning
    down their independence, to make Bond more of a " Knight in shining armour" .
    "I've been informed that there ARE a couple of QAnon supporters who are fairly regular posters in AJB."
  • AlphaOmegaSinAlphaOmegaSin EnglandPosts: 10,926MI6 Agent
    I think Flemings Attitude to Women changed a bit over Time.
    1.On Her Majesties Secret Service 2.The Living Daylights 3.license To Kill 4.The Spy Who Loved Me 5.Goldfinger
  • perdoggperdogg Posts: 432MI6 Agent
    I think Flemings Attitude to Women changed a bit over Time.

    You have to remember that Kissy Suzuki became the sexual aggressor in YOLT. Had Bond done what Suzuki did, people would be calling for the novels to be banned.
    "And if I told you that I'm from the Ministry of Defence?" James Bond - The Property of a Lady
  • 002002 New ZealandPosts: 558MI6 Agent
    Yes, despite some rather questionable (by today's standards) attitudes regarding race, politics and academia, Fleming's novels contain some rather fair play regarding sexism and the way the women were treated. In this respect, I feel they are superior to the films. Moonraker is, perhaps, the best example of this.
  • AlphaOmegaSinAlphaOmegaSin EnglandPosts: 10,926MI6 Agent
    edited July 2015
    perdogg wrote:
    I think Flemings Attitude to Women changed a bit over Time.

    You have to remember that Kissy Suzuki became the sexual aggressor in YOLT. Had Bond done what Suzuki did, people would be calling for the novels to be banned.

    Bond had lost his Memory though, so it was more of a Case of Kissy taking Advantage of him.

    Fleming wrote a lot of his Women as strong Characters. Gala Brand, Tiffany Case, Pussy Galore, etc.
    1.On Her Majesties Secret Service 2.The Living Daylights 3.license To Kill 4.The Spy Who Loved Me 5.Goldfinger
  • RevelatorRevelator Posts: 604MI6 Agent
    I think Flemings Attitude to Women changed a bit over Time.

    It might be more accurate to say that Bond's view of women changed pretty quickly. Remember that in Casino Royale Bond didn't want Vesper working with him and complained that women got in the way of work. Later when Vesper gets kidnapped, Bond goes into a rage and says women should just stay home. Now, this is partly irony on Fleming's part, because, far from being incompetent, Vesper has arranged her own kidnapping and made a fool of Bond.
    The realization of that might account for why Bond has no objections to working with Gala, whose competence seems doubly assuring. It's a tribute to her character that she still seems up-to-date. Unfortunately, Fleming's best female characters have rarely been given their due by hostile critics and academics.
Sign In or Register to comment.