Rating films by adding the sum of its parts

am747

Decade average:

1. 1960s = 45.5
2. 1970s = 42.2
3. 1980s = 41.0
4. 2010s = 40.0
5. 1990s = 37.7
6. 2000s = 36.3

Overall average per film = 41.35 (41)

Higgins

am747 wrote:

Decade average:

1. 1960s = 45.5
2. 1970s = 42.2
3. 1980s = 41.0
4. 2010s = 40.0
5. 1990s = 37.7
6. 2000s = 36.3

Overall average per film = 41.35 (41)

am747 wrote:

48 = FRWL and OHMSS
46 = DN
45 = GF and TSWLM
44 = TB, LALD, OP and TLD
42 = YOLT and TMWTGG
41 = DAF, LTK and SP
40 = FYEO
39 = MR, TND, TWINE, CR and SF
36 = AVTAK
35 = GE, DAD and QoS


Decade average:
1. 1960s = 45.5
2. 1970s = 42.2
3. 1980s = 41.0
4. 2010s = 40.0
5. 1990s = 37.7
6. 2000s = 36.3

Overall average per film = 41.35 (41)


{[]

How did I know that this will all end up into another pointless raking table

Thunderpussy

I think some Bond fans are accounts, hence the love for
Lists of figures ?

HatThrowingHenchman

Higgins wrote:

am747 wrote:

Decade average:

1. 1960s = 45.5
2. 1970s = 42.2
3. 1980s = 41.0
4. 2010s = 40.0
5. 1990s = 37.7
6. 2000s = 36.3

Overall average per film = 41.35 (41)

am747 wrote:

48 = FRWL and OHMSS
46 = DN
45 = GF and TSWLM
44 = TB, LALD, OP and TLD
42 = YOLT and TMWTGG
41 = DAF, LTK and SP
40 = FYEO
39 = MR, TND, TWINE, CR and SF
36 = AVTAK
35 = GE, DAD and QoS


Decade average:
1. 1960s = 45.5
2. 1970s = 42.2
3. 1980s = 41.0
4. 2010s = 40.0
5. 1990s = 37.7
6. 2000s = 36.3

Overall average per film = 41.35 (41)


{[]

How did I know that this will all end up into another pointless raking table

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SfnM-fDHlrs

Thunderpussy

" It's a kind of Tragic !"

Although, If lists are what you enjoy, then list away -{ we all have
our passions.

am747

Those who like to rate films on IMDB, if you divide the total by 5, you will get a number out of 10. That number can be used to rate movies (relatively objectively) on IMDB:

Total = Movie = IMDB type of score (rounded)

48 = FRWL and OHMSS = 9.6 (10)
46 = DN = 9.2 (9)
45 = GF and TSWLM = 9
44 = TB, LALD, OP and TLD = 8.8 (9)
42 = YOLT and TMWTGG = 8.4 (8)
41 = DAF, LTK and SP = (8)
40 = FYEO = 8
39 = MR, TND, TWINE, CR and SF = 7.8 (8)
36 = AVTAK = 7.2 (7)
35 = GE, DAD and QoS = 7

{[]

am747

Thunderpussy wrote:

I think some Bond fans are accounts, hence the love for
Lists of figures ?

Not an accounts but I like the figures to be well rounded

am747

One way of knowing how you have done on your ratings is to see what is the minimum that you can give to a Bond film on IMDB. For me, it is 6 / 10 in the worst case. Usually it is around 7 or higher. The total of my lowest rated films come to 35 or 7 on IMDB .... So if I have a total of a film is less than 30, it would mean that I may have not rated the film as objectively as I would have liked

So if someone has a total of say 20 for a film. It = 4 on IMDB. IMO, that would be a low overall score for a Bond film. In such cases, the rating could be off or not nearly as objectively done

Higgins

I am so glad that I am grown up and confident enough to make my opinion on a 007 movie without relying or needing it reconfirmed by IMDB or one of these pointless w rankings

am747

Higgins wrote:

I am so glad that I am grown up and confident enough to make my opinion on a 007 movie without relying or needing it reconfirmed by IMDB or one of these pointless w rankings

For whatever reasons, you are still following the ranking or ratings on this thread ) .... The membership for the so-called misty-eyed club is not high, so I suggested you spend more time on recruiting some members

HatThrowingHenchman

good strategy to go off topic and get personal

am747

Not a big fan of grouping films based on actors but anyways .... Avg score per film for each Bond actor:

* GL = 48.0
* SC = 44.3
* TD = 42.5
* RM = 41.4
* DC = 38.5
* PB = 37.0

{[]