And we all know the CIA has a perfect record of telling the truth.
In America we like evidence to go along with our accusations. So far none has been presented.
Oh, that's interesting as you haven't been like that "american" with your accusations against Hillary and the Clinton Foundation
Convincing evidence has been made public re: HRC/CF.
Please, every one in power is corrupt to one degree or another. I'll prejudicialy single out those that get innocents killed over jerks lining their pockets (though those lines blur often as well...).
Given all his attacks on Clinton, I never thought Cheld was
so left wing to support " Mother Russia " )
Sigh. I should've known that someone who spends enough time on one forum to post 54,000 times wouldn't understand the multiple questions at play here. Your simplistic "for us or against us" attitude reeks of George Dumbya Bush. Let's start with the fact that I'm neither "right wing" nor "left"; I'm libertarian. I voted for Gary Johnson. Had Sanders been the D nominee I would have given serious consideration to voting for him, since his views on several important issues align with mine (surveillance and war chief among them).
There's little that's been made public and verified other than that someone sent a phishing email to HRC campaign manager John Podesta, and that an IT person on Team Clinton accidentally told Podesta that the email was legitimate (he left out the word "not" in his response), which led to Podesta providing the phisher with his password by clicking on a link in the phishing message and entering it on a form that looked like a "change your password" form where you have to enter your existing password.
Someone also leaked Trump's 1995 tax return to Suzanne Craig of the New York Times and the Times hired a team of tax analysts to go over it. All politicians have things they want to keep secret. I'd rather have an electorate that's more educated thanks to a bit of skullduggery than a neat and tidy smile-for-the-cameras reality show of a campaign.
I also think the people showing the most outrage at this alleged attempt at influencing our election would have more credibility if they hadn't been such ardent supporters of violent regime change in multiple countries around the world (obviously you know about Iraq and Libya, but here's an article - on the left-wing Huffington Post site - about HRC's support of a military coup in Honduras that ousted the democratically-elected president):
The best evidence that could be produced in this situation would be for the media to locate voters who declare categorically that the Podesta emails swayed their vote from HRC to DJT.
LoeffelholzThe United States, With LovePosts: 8,998Quartermasters
8-) Such dreariness. Hopefully those looking to join a James Bond website to actually discuss Bond will afford threads like this the appropriately minimal attention
Check out my Amazon author page!Mark Loeffelholz
"I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
"Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
Let's start with the fact that I'm neither "right wing" nor "left"; I'm libertarian. I voted for Gary Johnson.
Well, most libertarian, I see them on the the right wing of the right wingers
We are calling them market radicals.
Market is King, don't care if we are robbing the poor 3 rd world, about what happens to nature to those who can't compete, who afford to act morally and not only money driven.
It's an egoist point of view favourable for those as long as they can compete in the rat race.
President of the 'Misty Eyes Club'.
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
I seem to have annoyed Cheld, ..... So Score ! On that one )
The great thing about this thread is that you get all opinions, from grass roots to bluegrass, white collar,
Blue collar, red neck etc. now, where is my copy of Red Dawn ?
"I've been informed that there ARE a couple of QAnon supporters who are fairly regular posters in AJB."
Comments
Don't crush their world into pieces ) ) )
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
I'm glad to hear you don't buy Trump's alligations about voter fraud that gave "millions" of votes for Hillary
I can sense where this will be going.....
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
And Breitbart paying for the bill
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
+1. Nice one, TP! )
The US paying for it themselves, I'd imagine, as is only proper.
#1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
Yes indeed...I and my fellow NHS workers thank you for it -{
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
Of course -{
And I may even treat myself to a pair of green trainers :007)
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
:v
#1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
Convincing evidence has been made public re: HRC/CF.
#1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
Sigh. I should've known that someone who spends enough time on one forum to post 54,000 times wouldn't understand the multiple questions at play here. Your simplistic "for us or against us" attitude reeks of George Dumbya Bush. Let's start with the fact that I'm neither "right wing" nor "left"; I'm libertarian. I voted for Gary Johnson. Had Sanders been the D nominee I would have given serious consideration to voting for him, since his views on several important issues align with mine (surveillance and war chief among them).
There's little that's been made public and verified other than that someone sent a phishing email to HRC campaign manager John Podesta, and that an IT person on Team Clinton accidentally told Podesta that the email was legitimate (he left out the word "not" in his response), which led to Podesta providing the phisher with his password by clicking on a link in the phishing message and entering it on a form that looked like a "change your password" form where you have to enter your existing password.
Someone also leaked Trump's 1995 tax return to Suzanne Craig of the New York Times and the Times hired a team of tax analysts to go over it. All politicians have things they want to keep secret. I'd rather have an electorate that's more educated thanks to a bit of skullduggery than a neat and tidy smile-for-the-cameras reality show of a campaign.
I also think the people showing the most outrage at this alleged attempt at influencing our election would have more credibility if they hadn't been such ardent supporters of violent regime change in multiple countries around the world (obviously you know about Iraq and Libya, but here's an article - on the left-wing Huffington Post site - about HRC's support of a military coup in Honduras that ousted the democratically-elected president):
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-naiman/secretary-of-state-hillar_b_9273712.html
The best evidence that could be produced in this situation would be for the media to locate voters who declare categorically that the Podesta emails swayed their vote from HRC to DJT.
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
#1.TLD/LTK 2.TND 3.GF 4.GE 5.DN 6.FYEO 7.FRWL 8.TMWTGG 9.TWINE 10.YOLT/QOS
"I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
"Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
Well, most libertarian, I see them on the the right wing of the right wingers
We are calling them market radicals.
Market is King, don't care if we are robbing the poor 3 rd world, about what happens to nature to those who can't compete, who afford to act morally and not only money driven.
It's an egoist point of view favourable for those as long as they can compete in the rat race.
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
The great thing about this thread is that you get all opinions, from grass roots to bluegrass, white collar,
Blue collar, red neck etc. now, where is my copy of Red Dawn ?
Is that one of your under the counter adult films about a Russian nympho?
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!