Different 90s Bond?
Oakvale
Pennsylvania Posts: 155MI6 Agent
If Brosnan declined the role, and Timothy Dalton obviously quit, who would be a top contender or get it?
It always seemed to me like there was a weak bench for the casting before Goldeneye, but that was probably because Brosnan stood head and shoulders above everyone else (literally).
It always seemed to me like there was a weak bench for the casting before Goldeneye, but that was probably because Brosnan stood head and shoulders above everyone else (literally).
Comments
https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/wish-i-was-at-disneyland/id1202780413?mt=2
Hugh Grant physically fits the part as much as Brosnan did, he would probably get a lot of hype, and might be decent.
Neeson I think ruled himself out but Gibson would be... well... 8-)
An actor I wish would have been considered, believe it or not, is Daniel Day Lewis. On first glance, he might not have enough qualities to play the role, but his performances in both The Unbearable Lightness of Being, where he plays a playboy physician not unlike movie Bond in temperament, and The Last of the Mohicans, where he is the heroic Hawkeye, convinced me he could do the role. Unfortunately. the trailer for the former does not do his performance justice;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1zYYWHFRNw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIPzGBiEE6k
A method actor like Lewis likely would have created the most faithful version of Fleming's Bond yet.
Thank god Hugh Grant did not get the job. Neeson would have been a good choice though.
Hugh Grant would have been "too Roger Moore" IMO, but Sam Neil would have been a decent candidate. But Neil has spoken of his bond screentest as one of the worst experiences in his action life, so I doubt he would have taken the role.
I agree, I always thought that he would have been terrific.