The difference fashion & grooming can make by example of Daniel Craig

Daniel Bond

Isn't it amazing what a difference grooming and fashion can make?

Grooming:





Fashion:

Arbogast 777

I would also add fitness. He looks a tad bit heavier in that first photo...

Matt S

Arbogast777 wrote:

I would also add fitness. He looks a tad bit heavier in that first photo...

If anything, he looks scrawnier.

Thunderpussy

..... With a well turned calf

canoe2

And let us not forget the power of movie lighting, the contributions of the hair and make-up departments and personal stylists, and, of course, photoshop. Then there's general diet and fitness.

Arbogast 777

Matt S wrote:

Arbogast777 wrote:

I would also add fitness. He looks a tad bit heavier in that first photo...

If anything, he looks scrawnier.

I disagree. I think his face looks puffy in the first but more chiseled in the second, like he had lost some body fat. Not saying I can't be wrong, though.

ppw3o6r

Daniel is very very well groomed which is why upon completing SPECTRE he told the crew as a whole including the armourers to F*uck Off! (allegedly!)

Chriscoop

I can't remember who said it, maybe sienna miller? anyway it was said that he had an aversion to bathing? Not sure how accurate that is.

armenianmovieman

2nd pic looks like a young Liam Neeson with short hair. lol

walther p99

He's definitely thinner in the first pic, look at the size of his neck compared to the CR era pic.

Arbogast 777

Matt S wrote:

If anything, he looks scrawnier.

walther p99 wrote:

He's definitely thinner in the first pic, look at the size of his neck compared to the CR era pic.

To clarify what I'm trying to say about the pics - he definitely has less muscle in the first pic but also has a higher percentage of body fat. It's referred to in fitness circles as being "skinny fat." So when you guys say he looks smaller in the first pic, that's not necessarily counter to what I'm saying. I'm talking more about his overall fitness, not his bulking up...

Matt S

Arbogast777 wrote:

walther p99 wrote:

He's definitely thinner in the first pic, look at the size of his neck compared to the CR era pic.

To clarify what I'm trying to say about the pics - he definitely has less muscle in the first pic but also has a higher percentage of body fat. It's referred to in fitness circles as being "skinny fat." So when Walter P99 and Matt S say he looks smaller in the first pic, that's not necessarily in disagreement with what I'm saying. I'm talking more about his overall fitness, not his bulking up...

There's no doubt he has less muscle in the first picture, but I'm not seeing any fat either. Just skin and bones! No muscle, no fat, malnourished and on a diet of just cigarettes.

Arbogast 777

Matt S wrote:

There's no doubt he has less muscle in the first picture, but I'm not seeing any fat either. Just skin and bones! No muscle, no fat, malnourished and on a diet of just cigarettes.

It's too small a point to worry about, so we'll just agree to disagree. Cheers {[]

Daniel Bond

canoe2 wrote:

And let us not forget the power of movie lighting, the contributions of the hair and make-up departments and personal stylists, and, of course, photoshop. Then there's general diet and fitness.

It's certainly true that movie lighting, make up and photoshop play a role but there are tons of pictures of him being spottet on the street (like picture 3) where none of these things are involvend and he still looks so much better than in picture 1.
It just amazes me how much you can make out of yourself if you compare the pictures.
Now the question is, what did he do specifically?

I want to focus on his face first.
In picture 1 he has a blue spot on his nose, possibly a varicose vein and spots under his eyes which are both gone.
How did that come about?
Also his skin looks rather dry dull and unhealthy in this picture.

Does anyone know weather he had smoking drinking or drug habits that he reduced or quit?
Or did he change his eating habits to a healthier diet?

After all, what difference can a change in diet make in the way you look facial wise?
And by that I don't mean gaining or losing weight. You can be slim and eat a bad diet and you can be slim eating a good diet.
What difference can eating habits make in the way you look do you think?

Also what difference can exercise make in the way you look facial wise?
Obviously you can build mucle and get healthier internally, but what difference can exercise make in the way you look facial wise which is something that is not so obvious?

Chriscoop

Dc was a massive smoker (marlboro lights) and lightheartedly stated to be an alcoholic inbetween bouts of going to the gym. He quit smoking for the build up to cr saying a man like bond in modern times should be able to run a mile. I believe the photo you have in the first post was taken during filming of Munich. That looks like a bruise on his nose to me, but he looks like he's on the back end of a bender. In fairness though we have photos that we dislike of ourselves ours just aren't all out there for such scrutiny. For all we know that first photo was taken after he'd had flu or food poisoning or something?
His dress sense and appearance has definitely improved since he landed the bond role as has his wealth. He knows how to put an outfit together and can afford to now.
DC strikes me as a man's man who has a tendency to go native on occasion, negating shaving etc.

canoe2

Daniel Bond wrote:

After all, what difference can a change in diet make in the way you look facial wise?
And by that I don't mean gaining or losing weight. You can be slim and eat a bad diet and you can be slim eating a good diet.
What difference can eating habits make in the way you look do you think?

Also what difference can exercise make in the way you look facial wise?
Obviously you can build mucle and get healthier internally, but what difference can exercise make in the way you look facial wise which is something that is not so obvious?

In a general sense, if you had to choose just one, I would think nutrition is more important than exercise. Garbage in = garbage out. The impact of just replacing soda with water can be massive.

The benefits of exercise are pretty well known. And, to state the obvious, if you loose fat the shape of your face will change, especially in the cheeks and around the jawline.

But, as Chriscoop points out, lifestyle choices also have a big effect. Smoking causes premature aging of the skin. That's a well established fact. Not getting enough rest is another factor. Alcohol isn't inherently bad. A couple of glasses of red wine a week is supposed to be good for you. But pint after pint every night? That's causing some damage for sure. There's also the effect it has on people's mental state with regards to motivation, decision making, self-discipline and general happiness. Drugs (especially hard drugs) are a whole other level.

There are other things as well: using sunblock when you're outside for example. Going for a walk after dinner instead of heading straight for the couch. Quality time with good friends and family.

The ideal of course is that diet, exercise and lifestyle choices work together. You eat right to provide your body with the nutrients and energy it needs to fuel your exercise and day to day activities. You get enough rest to allow your body and mind to recover. And you have time to relax and destress to keep yourself happy and enjoying life.

Will all that make your skin look better? My guess is it will. But I'm sure the occassional laser peel also helps

Chriscoop

Agree with everything canoe2 says, I'd just add that even without exercise what you eat makes a massive difference to how you look, eyes can be made healthier and look brighter by making sure you have Lutin in your diet, peppers are rich in this, proper proteins and iron are essential, show me someone with low iron levels and I'll show you someone with an unhealthy pallour. Obviously we know about vitamins and minerals. I'd also add that sleep and stress can make a huge difference to someone's face.

Daniel Bond

Great posts so far !
Motivated by Daniel Craig I recently decided to go from average to superior by becoming the best verison of myself in terms of looks (both face and body wise), health and fashion. Any advice on how to best go about that journey?

What I mean by that is that there are basically 3 methods of acquiring knowledge.
- First by conducting the trial and error method which because it is very time consuming has to be limited to as little as possible but might be necessary to a limited extend in areas where one thing works different in various people and therefore has to be tested on yourself in order to figure out what works for you and what doesn't.
- Second by reading books, watching video tutorials, reading information on websites and in forums and by conduction online research.
Because there is a substantial amout of garbage out there and a large amount of the information is repetitive you have to first read it all to figure out that you could have saved 80 % of your time and effort had you known before what is good and what is garbage or repetitive.
- The third and best option in my opinion is to find people who have gone through the second option and can tell you what to read watch and do or by providing a blueprint on how to go about or by finding a role model you have access to or a mentor.
That way you can focus on the 20% of good information without wasting 80 % of your time.

I'm mainly interested in that kind of information but different points of view and advice are also greatly appreciated!

Where is my starting point?
I'm 30, never took any drugs, never smoked don't drink and I stay away from junk foot but I still don't look very healthy.
I don't work out, I'm rather thin and my wardrobe sucks. I even walk around in sweaters with tiny holes in them, not because I can't afford a new one but because I didn't give a ****. But I guess the strongest motivation always comes after you hit your low point!

OSS117

canoe2 wrote:

... Alcohol isn't inherently bad ...

Yes it is.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-alcohol-guidelines-show-increased-risk-of-cancer

Arbogast 777

OSS117 wrote:

canoe2 wrote:

... Alcohol isn't inherently bad ...

Yes it is.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-alcohol-guidelines-show-increased-risk-of-cancer

All depends what article you read...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2512175/Alcohol-good-health-Leading-science-writer-claims-tipple-prevent-cancer-help-improve-sex-life.html

James Brosnan

Very cool discussion has come from this one Daniel Bond, so thanks for bringing it up. It looks like you are new to AJB, so welcome to the community my friend. I agree about your assessment that one of the best ways to learn is to sort out the 80% of useless information via other people's experiences and knowledge base. With regards to styling and how to dress, you've come to the right place as there is a wealth of knowledge and experienced people here. Some of the best shared knowledge can be found at the forum member created sites like:

http://www.iconicalternatives.com/

http://www.bondsuits.com/

http://thebondexperience.com/

Regarding healthy eating and lifestyle, I'm in comeplete agreement with Chris and Canoe above. I myself am obsessed with constantly improving my eating habits and my exercise routines. I started to post about my eating habits on my Instagram (link in bio below). I know David Zaritzky of the Bond experience has done a few health related vlogs as well.

When it comes to eating healthy, the number one thing is to make sure your food is real and minimally processed. Getting the right balance of carbs, fats, proteins, and vitimans is also key. But, remember, the final say in what is good for you is your body. Something that may be very good for you "on paper" may not make you feel good and may not work for you; that's where the trial and error does come in. But, as you mentioned, if you have already sorted out the 20% from the 80%, then than trial and error process should be more effective.

Hope that helps and All the best -{