The test will be whether customers are willing to pay the sky-high prices. From looking at the stock left of 007 merchandise left on Orlebar Brown's website, my sense is that the company isn't having trouble moving product. If that's true, OB is going to continue their pricing scheme.
Yeah they are selling like mad thats for sure so nothing will change in that regard and I imagine that 007 licence wont come cheap
Will be interesting how limited it is or if they keep doing reruns
Actually any license doesn’t come cheap, but can usually be covered by an price increase of 5-10% of the items. I totally understand that the pieces are nice but still absolutely overpriced.
Im a huge fan of the brand and have buyed myself a lot of overpriced bond stuff before, but let’s face it the pieces have no price-quality ratio that justify the purchase, except from a collector point of view. And they sell them for the prices quite good, but usually such capsules more a marketing tool that’s creating brand awareness and not produced in massive quantities, that’s why they sold out so quickly.
Certainly, as it's also ok to have an opinion about this pricing, in this case ridiculous, especially for items that never was in any Bond. The Bond name will be watered down if a company can stamp 007 on any item and call it a Bond item. Keep this up and if we're lucky we're gonna see a toothpaste with 007.
Everybody is free to pay (or not pay) for the the items he/she wants (or don't want). Since these items are selling pretty well, OB can ask the prices they do because obviously, there is still an audience that is willing to pay the higher prices. OB has always been a brand with high quality items and prices that match that, the markup on these items seem steep but I assume that EON also takes a cut. Or do people believe that EON just hands out licencing deals like this without expecting anything in return?
All in all, the items sell out quickly for the (steep) prices asked. Are we really blaming a company for making money?
(EDIT: sorry, didn't see Welshboy's reply before I posted)
Price aside (which I agree is high) I think the majority of the collection is quite fun and pretty cool.
We can’t buy genuine items from decades ago e.g. Thunderball etc so it’s cool to get the opportunity to purchase these inspired pieces with a modern twist.
Thunderball is one of my faves so I’m over the moon with those pieces which they heavily concentrated on. They could of gotten closer but I don’t think that was their aim which they have kind of stated.
My main qualm is the 007 logo on the back of the OB tag however it’s not noticeable since on the back and flaps over. And well - you can easily cut it off if need be. One would presume it might be part of the licensing requirement.
Agree the Goldfinger shorts are prob the ones furthest away from the originals - however I think the rest are great updates
The idea of expensive swimshorts isn't new. Prada has $1000 men's swimwear which sells. But the whole OB line is being sold as being "inspired by Bond". I can see the inspiration in most of the other pieces so if they want to charge a premium, then fine. But the Goldfinger shorts are basically Setters in a new color with gold colored hardware. They don't look anything like Connery's swimsuit. Charging a higher premium for those is excessive imho.
The idea of expensive swimshorts isn't new. Prada has $1000 men's swimwear which sells. But the whole OB line is being sold as being "inspired by Bond". I can see the inspiration in most of the other pieces so if they want to charge a premium, then fine. But the Goldfinger shorts are basically Setters in a new color with gold colored hardware. They don't look anything like Connery's swimsuit. Charging a higher premium for those is excessive imho.
Maybe David can weigh in, but I'm curious what the thinking was here - they seem to have nailed the color, so why not make some effort to match the cut? It's a very curious decision.
I share the same view of most of the forum on those shorts.
OB is trying to sell at high-end prices, but the reality is, all it has to offer is the Bond connection - despite how loose it seems to have become. The materials, construction, etc quite honestly don’t cut it at that price point
The idea of expensive swimshorts isn't new. Prada has $1000 men's swimwear which sells. But the whole OB line is being sold as being "inspired by Bond". I can see the inspiration in most of the other pieces so if they want to charge a premium, then fine. But the Goldfinger shorts are basically Setters in a new color with gold colored hardware. They don't look anything like Connery's swimsuit. Charging a higher premium for those is excessive imho.
Maybe David can weigh in, but I'm curious what the thinking was here - they seem to have nailed the color, so why not make some effort to match the cut? It's a very curious decision.
Agreed, especially since they have an excellent style to use for the Goldfinger trunks, the Basset. I think that with a bit of altering and some extra details, this would have been a good option.
Certainly, as it's also ok to have an opinion about this pricing, in this case ridiculous, especially for items that never was in any Bond. The Bond name will be watered down if a company can stamp 007 on any item and call it a Bond item. Keep this up and if we're lucky we're gonna see a toothpaste with 007.
Everybody is free to pay (or not pay) for the the items he/she wants (or don't want). Since these items are selling pretty well, OB can ask the prices they do because obviously, there is still an audience that is willing to pay the higher prices. OB has always been a brand with high quality items and prices that match that, the markup on these items seem steep but I assume that EON also takes a cut. Or do people believe that EON just hands out licencing deals like this without expecting anything in return?
All in all, the items sell out quickly for the (steep) prices asked. Are we really blaming a company for making money?
(EDIT: sorry, didn't see Welshboy's reply before I posted)
But is it really ridiculous? It would an example of terrible pricing if no one would buy them, but there are scores of people who feel perfectly okay with paying a premium for these items. So selling them for less would be ridiculous from Orlebar Brown's viewpoint. And lets be honest here, we are talking about luxury items where the price paid is always subjective and not always reflective of material, labor and marketing costs. When I see some people responding as if OB are withholding first life needs like water, medicines or basic food to starving people only to make a few extra quid (not you necessarily, but OB has gotten quite some backlash lately), I can only chuckle.
Certainly, as it's also ok to have an opinion about this pricing, in this case ridiculous, especially for items that never was in any Bond. The Bond name will be watered down if a company can stamp 007 on any item and call it a Bond item. Keep this up and if we're lucky we're gonna see a toothpaste with 007.
Everybody is free to pay (or not pay) for the the items he/she wants (or don't want). Since these items are selling pretty well, OB can ask the prices they do because obviously, there is still an audience that is willing to pay the higher prices. OB has always been a brand with high quality items and prices that match that, the markup on these items seem steep but I assume that EON also takes a cut. Or do people believe that EON just hands out licencing deals like this without expecting anything in return?
All in all, the items sell out quickly for the (steep) prices asked. Are we really blaming a company for making money?
(EDIT: sorry, didn't see Welshboy's reply before I posted)
But is it really ridiculous? It would an example of terrible pricing if no one would buy them, but there are scores of people who feel perfectly okay with paying a premium for these items. So selling them for less would be ridiculous from Orlebar Brown's viewpoint. And lets be honest here, we are talking about luxury items where the price paid is always subjective and not always reflective of material, labor and marketing costs. When I see some people responding as if OB are withholding first life needs like water, medicines or basic food to starving people only to make a few extra quid (not you necessarily, but OB has gotten quite some backlash lately), I can only chuckle.
Good call on the Bassetts, Peppermill!
Those kinds of decisions on the part of OB are what I'm referring to. The Bassetts retail for around $150. Modify them a little to become the "Goldfinger Shorts", charge $200 or $225 and I think they would have had a winner. Something like that design is much more in the "inspired by Bond" spirit of the collection, which is the basis for all of their marketing (and higher prices). Sure, people would have still grumbled about the price. But at least the similarities to the originals would have justified them being part of the collection. Plus, they already have 7 or 8 "Bond" shorts in the Setter/Bulldog style. Why add another pair?
Does anyone have sizing advice on the poster swim shorts? Do they fit “tight”? Did anyone have to size up?
I’m looking at Moonraker✌️
I take my usual size. I did think I might be able to size down but no chance and sent a pair back
Same here, they fit true to size (at least the Springers and Setters do, I except the Bulldogs are no different). They might be a bit snug when dry but they do loosen a bit when wet. So that snugness is needed to not have your Thunderballs and Moonraker showing after you dive in the pool.
Certainly, as it's also ok to have an opinion about this pricing, in this case ridiculous, especially for items that never was in any Bond. The Bond name will be watered down if a company can stamp 007 on any item and call it a Bond item. Keep this up and if we're lucky we're gonna see a toothpaste with 007.
Everybody is free to pay (or not pay) for the the items he/she wants (or don't want). Since these items are selling pretty well, OB can ask the prices they do because obviously, there is still an audience that is willing to pay the higher prices. OB has always been a brand with high quality items and prices that match that, the markup on these items seem steep but I assume that EON also takes a cut. Or do people believe that EON just hands out licencing deals like this without expecting anything in return?
All in all, the items sell out quickly for the (steep) prices asked. Are we really blaming a company for making money?
(EDIT: sorry, didn't see Welshboy's reply before I posted)
But is it really ridiculous? It would an example of terrible pricing if no one would buy them, but there are scores of people who feel perfectly okay with paying a premium for these items. So selling them for less would be ridiculous from Orlebar Brown's viewpoint. And lets be honest here, we are talking about luxury items where the price paid is always subjective and not always reflective of material, labor and marketing costs. When I see some people responding as if OB are withholding first life needs like water, medicines or basic food to starving people only to make a few extra quid (not you necessarily, but OB has gotten quite some backlash lately), I can only chuckle.
For those who've bought items from the OB 007 line what are your personal favorites? The ones you'd recommend to a friend.
The only item I sprung for is the DAF shirt, and it did not disappoint. It felt to me like the one piece in the collection I wouldn’t find anywhere else. FWIW, it’s also one of the most faithful recreations in the collection.
I would add to that the Bond “dress” shirt. It is slowly becoming my favorite since it’s so versatile. It can be worn with just about anything. Rolling up the sleeves makes it very casual.
Comments
The Bond Vivant - Twitter
The Bond Vivant - Facebook
The Bond Vivant - YouTube
Im a huge fan of the brand and have buyed myself a lot of overpriced bond stuff before, but let’s face it the pieces have no price-quality ratio that justify the purchase, except from a collector point of view. And they sell them for the prices quite good, but usually such capsules more a marketing tool that’s creating brand awareness and not produced in massive quantities, that’s why they sold out so quickly.
Thanks.
I took a XL in this one (43 chest) for reference anybody around my size (initially bought XXL but appear to be XL in this collections shirts)
Link? I've looked and can't find it. -{
Bond: “I must be dreaming.”
Was here in 3/4 diff sizes
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Mens-Orlebar-Brown-Thunderball-Shirt-007-Cardinal-Capri-Collar-Shirt/113778177014?hash=item1a7db533f6:m:m5rZ4U_fDbrJlUJWuk8SNig
We can’t buy genuine items from decades ago e.g. Thunderball etc so it’s cool to get the opportunity to purchase these inspired pieces with a modern twist.
Thunderball is one of my faves so I’m over the moon with those pieces which they heavily concentrated on. They could of gotten closer but I don’t think that was their aim which they have kind of stated.
My main qualm is the 007 logo on the back of the OB tag however it’s not noticeable since on the back and flaps over. And well - you can easily cut it off if need be. One would presume it might be part of the licensing requirement.
Agree the Goldfinger shorts are prob the ones furthest away from the originals - however I think the rest are great updates
True to size or did you size up or down?
Maybe David can weigh in, but I'm curious what the thinking was here - they seem to have nailed the color, so why not make some effort to match the cut? It's a very curious decision.
OB is trying to sell at high-end prices, but the reality is, all it has to offer is the Bond connection - despite how loose it seems to have become. The materials, construction, etc quite honestly don’t cut it at that price point
Agreed, especially since they have an excellent style to use for the Goldfinger trunks, the Basset. I think that with a bit of altering and some extra details, this would have been a good option.
But is it really ridiculous? It would an example of terrible pricing if no one would buy them, but there are scores of people who feel perfectly okay with paying a premium for these items. So selling them for less would be ridiculous from Orlebar Brown's viewpoint. And lets be honest here, we are talking about luxury items where the price paid is always subjective and not always reflective of material, labor and marketing costs. When I see some people responding as if OB are withholding first life needs like water, medicines or basic food to starving people only to make a few extra quid (not you necessarily, but OB has gotten quite some backlash lately), I can only chuckle.
Good call on the Bassetts, Peppermill!
Those kinds of decisions on the part of OB are what I'm referring to. The Bassetts retail for around $150. Modify them a little to become the "Goldfinger Shorts", charge $200 or $225 and I think they would have had a winner. Something like that design is much more in the "inspired by Bond" spirit of the collection, which is the basis for all of their marketing (and higher prices). Sure, people would have still grumbled about the price. But at least the similarities to the originals would have justified them being part of the collection. Plus, they already have 7 or 8 "Bond" shorts in the Setter/Bulldog style. Why add another pair?
Maybe they based it on popularity of current models? More people likely to buy setters then budgies?
Then again the demand for the Onsie.......
I’m looking at Moonraker✌️
I take my usual size. I did think I might be able to size down but no chance and sent a pair back
Same here, they fit true to size (at least the Springers and Setters do, I except the Bulldogs are no different). They might be a bit snug when dry but they do loosen a bit when wet. So that snugness is needed to not have your Thunderballs and Moonraker showing after you dive in the pool.
The only item I sprung for is the DAF shirt, and it did not disappoint. It felt to me like the one piece in the collection I wouldn’t find anywhere else. FWIW, it’s also one of the most faithful recreations in the collection.
I also second the DAF and the TB shirts.
I really like the colour and the cut of the TB Carmine Camp Shirt. Wore it on holiday last week and it felt and looked great.
The TB long sleeved polo feels amazing when you put it on. Not worn it out yet, almost feels too good to wear unless it’s a special occasion.
Just ordered the OHMSS dress shirt. I think that has the potential to be worn quite casually in the summer. Will let you know.