Enough Publicity?
heartbroken_mr_drax
New Zealand Posts: 2,073MI6 Agent
Do you guys think that there is enough publicity of CR?
I dont know about the rest of the world but in new zealand i havent heard much at all on TV etc.
Is there much in UK & US?
I dont know about the rest of the world but in new zealand i havent heard much at all on TV etc.
Is there much in UK & US?
1. TWINE 2. FYEO 3. MR 4. TLD 5. TSWLM 6. OHMSS 7. DN 8. OP 9. AVTAK 10. TMWTGG 11. QoS 12. GE 13. CR 14. TB 15. FRWL 16. TND 17. LTK 18. GF 19. SF 20. LaLD 21. YOLT 22. NTTD 23. DAD 24. DAF. 25. SP
"Better make that two."
"Better make that two."
Comments
yea its decemeber 7th for me too X-( im gonna have to avoid the forums from when it realeases in US and UK till it realeases here. lol
"Better make that two."
Roger Moore 1927-2017
It's starting to make ripples, which going by tradition will become a media tidal wave in the UK come November 16th.
Yes, there is plenty in the magazines at the moment, especially the film mags, but there is also the TV and radio ads.The cinemas also seem to be full of posters for CR. There is also the David Walliams tv programme on Bond next week which is no doubt designed to coincide with the release of CR.
There seems to be plenty around and most people I know certainly are aware CR is coming to a cinema near them shortly
Did they play it? It really does seem to not be getting any kind of action, that song. DAD was released on Nov 22 and the single had been released on Oct 31 or thereabouts. This song hasn't even had any radio play yet; it's weird.
As for other publicity- yeah; it's all over. They've even got TV ads going, which I don't remember seeing for any other Bond until after the film opened.
Plus the Harrods Casino Royale window display is up!
Or maybe not, Edith
Ironically, I don't see it making Radio 1's playlist at all.
"I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
"Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
I saw a Smirnoff commercial the other night and it was fairly useless. It didn't show any clips from the film, there was no mention of Daniel Craig, but the narrator made references to Bond and his penchant for vodka, and the Casino Royale/007 logo popped up at the end with the caption that the movie will be in theaters on Nov. 17. I agree with Loeffelholz that EON should bang the PR drum a bit louder.
Not enough apparently. We've had a new graduate girl (30 years old) start where we are and we went to Brussels together on Monday for a Tuesday meeting.
At B'ham Airport Duty Free shop I saw three film mags covers in a row with Bond on the front from afar and said to her, 'what do u think of the new Bond'
Surprised reply, 'There's a new James Bond ???"
After I got back to my feet and asked her where she had been, I asked her if she knew who Pierce Brosnan was, Sean Connery, Roger. She said I know all them, whose the new one. I dragged her to the mag rack and showed her the covers.
'That's not James Bond' was the answer. And this with DC looking sharp and made up in the cover. If she had seen his ealrier ragged day to to day shots, she woud have fainted.
That was my exact reaction on hearing he was a candidate too )
Who cares, I know lots of ladies that think hes the best looking one, its just anti tradition, hes not smooth, hes fleming smooth. :007)
"Better make that two."
Lets just see it first.
James Bond tends to be treated with Tall Poppie Syndrome. Not from fans i mean.
"Better make that two."
Puhleeeeze.
There was also a piece about CR on the 7 pm news on NRK1 last friday(THE most important news source in Norway - a bit like the 9 o'clock news on BBC)
As CR will be the next film I see at the cinema I'll never know what impact the trailer had when shown on the big screen.
BBC News chappie here:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/avdb/news/video/64000/bb/64074_16x9_bb.ram
says there are no plans to release the song as a single.
I really don't think Bond movies are the "events" we Bond fans think they are for the general public. If people hear CR is a good movie, they'll go -- it's as simple as that.
"Better make that two."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRAVMCnhni4
I agree.Like HH,I was also around in the 1960s(I was a teenager then) and I started watching the Bonds at that time.They really were EVENTS--and each film was different than the last one.Dr No was the mad scientist movie,From Russia With Love,a suspense thriller.Goldfinger was a perfect crime story and Thunderball was an epic.
For their period,the elements of sex and sadism(mild by today's standards,yes-- but very powerful stuff in the repressed 60s)displayed in the early Bonds marked a new direction for adventure films.Aside from the serials of the 1930s,along with such movies as Foreign Correspondent and North by Northwest,nothing like the James Bond films had really been made before--much less as an ongoing series.
The first four Bond films were exceedingly popular with the public and as a result,Sean Connery became an international superstar overnight.Those original four movies even came out once a year--and without a drop in quality--something we'll never see again.
Casino Royale may well be a kind of throwback to the earlier 60s movies stylistically,yet regardless of it's many qualities, it probably doesn't seem as important to general filmgoers as the original 007 films did to their audiences decades ago.But that's really because the series has now been around for over 40 years, with five actors offering markedly different--but equally valid--interpretations of James Bond.The series is something of an institution today--but that wasn't always the case.
However,if CR is a good film(and it sure seems like it will be), it should definitely attract plenty of people--including a few who may have intentionally ignored some of the recent 007 movies in favor of the more so-called "realistic" spy movies,like The Bourne Identity,for example.
Pierce Brosnan was a popular 007-and so was Roger Moore.Timothy Dalton has his fans, as does George Lazenby.And Sean Connery was incredibly popular.They are all very different types--as is Daniel Craig, who unlike his predecessors, is obviously not a traditional leading man.Frankly,I don't think James Bond always has to be one of the handsomest men in the room in order to be an interesting character.
And I think it'd be a shame if Craig was simply dismissed out of hand by some potential audience members based entirely upon his face,as opposed to his acting ability--but that's just me.