Best Bond Director
heartbroken_mr_drax
New Zealand Posts: 2,073MI6 Agent
From what you know about the director and his vision, excluding which films u like etc....
Who do you think are the 2 best directors for a bond movie?
I think: Michael Apted and Lewis Gilbert.
Special Mention: Ternace Young & John Glen
Who do you think are the 2 best directors for a bond movie?
I think: Michael Apted and Lewis Gilbert.
Special Mention: Ternace Young & John Glen
1. TWINE 2. FYEO 3. MR 4. TLD 5. TSWLM 6. OHMSS 7. DN 8. OP 9. AVTAK 10. TMWTGG 11. QoS 12. GE 13. CR 14. TB 15. FRWL 16. TND 17. LTK 18. GF 19. SF 20. LaLD 21. YOLT 22. NTTD 23. DAD 24. DAF. 25. SP
"Better make that two."
"Better make that two."
Comments
I'd have to agree with these two. I will say this in John Glen's defense: he was very very capable of keeping the action from getting noisy and confusing. While this deals greatly with the editing as well, I think alot of credit goes to a solid vision of the story.
BTW: I vote that this belongs in the 'Films' forum.
Special Mention: John Glen and Guy Hamilton (in Goldfinger)
No. No. No. No. No.
And that is all I have to say about that.
Young, Hunt, Hamilton and Gilbert, were old school professionals. I respect all Bond directors for different reasons. Tamahori's title sequence deserves a few accolades for originality methinks!
"I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
"Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
*I know this is rather controversial as most people would rate Young as among the very best, but apart from my lack of desire to be swayed by peer pressure , I think that when overall careers are taken into account, Young was not quite as good as Apted.
Apted was great, though he could have used Hunt for TWINE's pacing.
"I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
"Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
Aye! TWINE's pacing and incredibly confusing action sequencing need some help (the whole silo bit and caviar factory comes to mind). After LTK, it seems that the films dropped off quite a bit in terms of 'sensible' action. To often, I find myself asking 'why is this or that happening' and I can hear the director whispering "your not supposed to be thinking! Just watch the movie!"
"Better make that two."
Credit given where credit is due - let Danny Kleinman get tose accolades for HIS titles sequence.
DAD had a few good elements, but DAD is just a montage movie, its like a clip show.
"Better make that two."
Exactly.It's Terence Young who is the single most important director in the entire history of the James Bond series, and for all of the reasons Hardyboy lists.Young's particular style is THE style of the series,and it's the one EON continually emulates.And of the lot,he's still the best director.
All of the other directors-- regardless of any unique talents and special fame they may enjoy apart from the Bond series--are just other directors who imitate Terence Young with varying degrees of success.
True, but I actually consider TWINE to be among the best directed Bond films of recent years. My problems with it are mainly due to the screenplay (which at the same time I think is a real strength of the film ).)
He successfully brought the espionage style back to the Bond fold in FYEO, fashioned exciting action thrillers out of OP and LTK, and also guided AVTAK and TLD which (if not memorable) were rather watchable.
It is of no importance that he didn't work with Connery or Brosnan; his films will always be hard to overlook.
They picked Tamorhi cos DAD would be a wall-to-wall action flick and Apted didn't do that. Of course, Tamorhi hadn't done an action film either up to that point.
And TWINE had been a move away from non-stop action of TND, which, it had been decided, wouldn't work. ?:)
It makes your head hurt, trying to follow Mickey and Babs' decisions... )
Roger Moore 1927-2017
Roger Moore 1927-2017
especial mention: I think most of them have been great directors, especially (apart from the best two) Lewis Gilbert, John Glen, Michael Apted and Martin Campbell, they had more balance and developed more consistant stories than Lee Tamahori, Roger Spootishwood or -the one who almost got in my list of best directors- Guy Hamilton.
But If we talk about "trademarks" I think Hamilton did a great job with that extreme-head on collision-zooms (for example at the end of GF). Campbell and his close ups, bigger than life action; Young and his master shots, depicting Bond's personal life and behavior towards autority or women; Hunt and that great sense for sensibility; Glen and Gilbert's cheerful aproach, the list is endless...
Goldfinger and LALD are in my top five, smoothly enjoyable classics that slip down nicely.
Roger Moore 1927-2017
Young definitely gave the breath of life into the cinematic Bond, going far beyond the duties of a director in pre-production. However, IMO, Hunt gave us pure honey.
I don't think anyone finds if confusing, just S-L-O-W, especially (at least from my perspective) the ParaHawk chase, though most everything in the film runs too long.
Young is clearly good though a bit humorless. I'd vote for Hamilton were it not for DAF and a host of others.
While OHMSS is a great film, I think Hunt mostly got lucky; the bulk of his directing efforts are pretty dreadful.