They're really reaching at this point. Once you've tasted fame I think some people will stick with anything to keep that head above water.
By the way, I've noticed a homophobic attitude on the site. Who exactly is running that place?
It's all right. It's quite all right, really. She's having a rest. We'll be going on soon. There's no hurry, you see. We have all the time in the world.
And to you Mr. Craig, how did it feel to Lie directly to Pierce's face? Did it make you feel good to know that a good portion of your support comes from Gay men? This site is not *homophobic* as some of you have claimed. But it does NOT support the Gay life style or think it is the right life style. I am tired of hearing your comebacks of * That site is just all homophobic*! YOU chose to live that lifestyle...so you deal with the consequences. Stop using it as an excuse.
Nice bit of irony in there ('I'm not homophobic; except for this homophobia I'm about to display'), but generally just terrifying- she's really revealed herself to be a proper dangerous nutcase. What a horrible woman.
I had a closer look at CnB today, and it's quite a sight! I have said before, and I'll say it again: It's perfectly legitimate and ok to think Craig is wrong for Bond and CR is a bad film. That's opinions, and people are free to have them. But they seem to believe CR is a flop, hated by critics and the audience. That only idiots, gays (whom they clearly don't like) and people paid by Sony see the movie. That the media and websites that like CR and Craig are paid by Sony.
This is just being in denial of the thruth and believing highly questionable conspiracy theories.
Can we not just start to ignore that this excuse for a campaign even exists anymore. Surely by discussing it and looking to articles you are playing into the owners hands.
Think of the money they have raked in from the adverts, I wouldn't mind betting the whole thing was just to make money...
Having said that I am glad that opinion has turned away from supporting the idea!!
Can we not just start to ignore that this excuse for a campaign even exists anymore. Surely by discussing it and looking to articles you are playing into the owners hands.
Think of the money they have raked in from the adverts, I wouldn't mind betting the whole thing was just to make money...
Having said that I am glad that opinion has turned away from supporting the idea!!
Right, her time will come soon enough. She's running out of steam at this point. As I said in an earlier post, some people will do nearly anything to maintain fame. At this point, the site is a joke. But soon it won't even be funny anymore. This was the woman's 15 minutes. Long ago she should have cashed in, accepted her small role in the history of bond, and stepped out of the stage light. Unfortunately for her, she's dug herself into a really deep hole. Tact, tact tact. This is what is really lacking here. The joke has gone on far too long.
It's all right. It's quite all right, really. She's having a rest. We'll be going on soon. There's no hurry, you see. We have all the time in the world.
James Bond is a hobby folks, not an passion. Go fall in love, enjoy your career, provide for your family, enjoy time with your friends, pray to God, don't waste your time making death threats about movies. There are so many more things that make life worth living. It's pathetic, simply pathetic in my view, to base all your emotions around a movie, with actors that don't know you, will probably never know you, and if your this insane, wouldn't want to know you. It's just absurd to think any of this bickering really goes anywhere but to dissapointments.
These Bond fans give a bad name for us all, even us "Pro-Craigers," though I refuse to base my hobby around some political party-esque designation so that will be the first and last time I use that.
You nailed it - be here, have fun but keep the lines between real life and fiction clear. Much much respect for your post TC {[]
For all its faults, I don't think we can accuse the people behind CnB for doing it for the money ar even for fame. We must also show moderation and tact now when CnB has turned into a grotesque parody of itself.
NightshooterIn bed with SolitairePosts: 2,917MI6 Agent
I hate to ask anyone to go to this site, but I need help. I would really appreciate it for someone to ID the movie that one of the pictures on the fanart section is from. On the sixth to last picture, there is a group of six pictures, three on the top and three on the bottom, all of Craig. Can anyone tell me what film the picture on the bottom center is from? Craig truly looks like Ian Fleming's Bond in that picture, at least to me, and I'd like to watch whatever movie it is from. Thanks in advance.
Hi, it's from a British TV drama called 'Archangel.' It was on last year. Should be able to get it on DVD if you are in the UK. If you look it up on IMDB you'll see the picture.
Thanks, zen. A true dose of sanity and reason. I guess CHUD missed "Kitn"'s rant, though, which revealed that they're not so much disappointed Bond fans as they are rabid Pierce Brosnan fans. I seriously hope Pierce has taken out a restraining order against that mob.
I hope Deanna Bryaton realizes that, at this point, this only actor she's now hurting is her own beloved Pierce Brosnan by running a website that keeps alive the whole "disgruntled Pierce” thing. Pierce has clearly put this behind him, as he has his Bond career, and he's done some good work (The Matador was fantastic). If Deanna really wants to help Pierce, she should use her energy to create a fansite in support of his post Bond career, not a site devoted to the humiliation and destruction of fellow actor in his name. If Pierce is even aware of this site, I sure it would be a terrible embarrassment for him.
Hi, it's from a British TV drama called 'Archangel.' It was on last year. Should be able to get it on DVD if you are in the UK. If you look it up on IMDB you'll see the picture.
Thanks, it was on Amazon US and I just ordered it. {[]
just looked on craignotbond.com just to see if there was any amusing articles floating about as i needed a giggle and came across something quite funny.
if you look on the front page of the site and scroll down a bit there are 3 pictures, one of brosnan, a drawing of bond brepresenting ian fleming's vision of bond and a picture of daniel craig.
the point being that they think pierce brosnan (who i do like) is more appropriate for ian fleming's vision of bond, but when i looked at iti found that the image of daniel craig (taken from the CR teaser) looks amazingly similar to the ian flemings drawing, thus proving (to me that is) that Mr Fleming would have been very pleased with the choice of daniel craig as bond.
if you havent noticed this i suggest you check it out.
CnB.com should really take more time researching for information and appropriate opinions before posting stuff like this on their website.
just looked on craignotbond.com just to see if there was any amusing articles floating about as i needed a giggle and came across something quite funny.
if you look on the front page of the site and scroll down a bit there are 3 pictures, one of brosnan, a drawing of bond brepresenting ian fleming's vision of bond and a picture of daniel craig.
the point being that they think pierce brosnan (who i do like) is more appropriate for ian fleming's vision of bond, but when i looked at iti found that the image of daniel craig (taken from the CR teaser) looks amazingly similar to the ian flemings drawing, thus proving (to me that is) that Mr Fleming would have been very pleased with the choice of daniel craig as bond.
if you havent noticed this i suggest you check it out.
CnB.com should really take more time researching for information and appropriate opinions before posting stuff like this on their website.
Indeed it looks considerable more like DC than PB. Almost like it could have been drawn from a photo of him.
It thrives on attention from people who disagree with it. The more you visit the site, even in fun, the longer it will stay in service. Seriously. Stop giving the site your time of day. Think about it. Its all offensively based. There is no discussion board. It is there to offend. Did you read her letter? The site dies if there is no one willing to listen.
It's all right. It's quite all right, really. She's having a rest. We'll be going on soon. There's no hurry, you see. We have all the time in the world.
It thrives on attention from people who disagree with it. The more you visit the site, even in fun, the longer it will stay in service. Seriously. Stop giving the site your time of day. Think about it. Its all offensively based. There is no discussion board. It is there to offend. Did you read her letter? The site dies if there is no one willing to listen.
Agreed . . . the woman who runs that site is a total quack. I think it's obvious by now that's she's completely delusional. Craig has more than proven himself to be a phenomenal 007. Bond's movie future, I think, is bright . . .!
There are plenty of Brosnan Websites, so go to one of them... and the movie hasn't (and won't) won the 1 boxoffice in U.S. but worldwide... well, sort of.
But something is true: the "hype" is over... like with DAD, so it happens to be normal, no a boycott.
Sorry lady, yet i kinda admire you... back then in 1995 if i had internet, money and my current knowledge (or againg, internet) i would make PierceNotBond and create a Boycott to bring Dalton again. My brothers would do the same with some sort of MoreBondMoore...
they are opinions... but i must be honest, i've read important ones over here.
it is a shame it is still runing, because.. it is to late (not wrong, just late: it wont happen, you can't win them all)
Here's why I'm not laughing--if anyone was or is making death threats against anyone on that site, and especially to their children or ANY family members for that matter, it's sick. I hope the police really do crack down on anyone who behaves that way. It's just a movie, for Pete's sake!
With that in mind, I think "KITN" displays some pretty unbalanced tendencies herself. To say that "we" Pro-Craig people somehow don't know the "truth" and that a "boycott" is something entirely different from a refusal by massive numbers of people to see the movie is symptomatic of deep, deep denial. To further say that the site is not homophobic after posting images of Craig IN A MOVIE ROLE kissing another man as evidence of his lack of suitability for the role (and later screaming that Mads Mikkelsen's possibly gay Le Chiffre IS homophobic) is hypocritcal--ditto the numerous lies, slanders, half-truths, and personal insults that have been slung at anyone involved with CR. Even this message, which demands civility from other people, is filled with vitriol directed toward Daniel Craig and Barbara Broccoli and dimisses people who like Craig as sub-human. And, clearly, this is a person who can see no other Bond than Pierce Brosnan.
I don't believe a word the crazy ***** says. This is just a way to deflect attention.
When the arrests are made---and actual people are named and indicted 8-) (as if) ---I'll afford this bullcrap a modicum of serious consideration. Until then, it's no different than the Craig/Monkey pictures...
'Sad' is right.
I agree with both of you, although I would change 'sad' to 'scary.' Extremely scary. If anyone from CnB knows KITN's identity, they really ought to try contacting her or the authorities. Even if what she says is true about threats (and frankly it sounds fishy to me) she's gone off the deep end, and someone needs to assess whether she is dangerous, not just to others, but to herself. You know someone has lost their grasp on reality when the casting of a movie becomes a question of good vs evil. The hatred towards Craig, his supporters, homosexuals, the producers etc ... This is exactly the kind of psychotic rage that leads to things like Columbine. Remember: those kids really were bullied. And I'm not just exaggerating for effect. KITN is out of control.
I thought all along that this woman was actually mentally unstable. Now this just confirms what I originally thought. I do believe she could be a danger to society now, and if I was Brosnan or Craig I would be slightly concerned by her wierd, obsessive views. Is this a female version of Mark Chapman or what....:o
The police should only be arresting one person here, if only to prevent her from doing damage to herself....or others!!!
I sure hope "Kitn"'s no older than 10.If she's in her teens,that's pretty sad.If she's in her 20s,that's pitiful.If she's anywhere near 30 or even older--then that's all kinds of tragic.
Ironically,whatever her age may be,"Kitn"(how cute a name is that?)probably did more to help Daniel Craig and Casino Royale than she ever could've imagined.The free publicity she created for them--and for Eon,too--was ultimately more beneficial than harmful.
Hopefully she'll calm down,stop calling people names, and get a life.Why she got SO worked up over a movie is difficult to comprehend.It's not as if everyone absolutely,positively, must see this film whether they want to or not.
Just thught i'd post another reason why i think CNB is pathetically useless.
When they bang on about how the hate the fact the Daniel Craig was cast as James Bond they mostly seem to base their grounds for hating him on Craig as a person not an actor. For example, they think he was a bad choice for Bond as he hates guns, is afraid of heights etc. I mean for heavens sake, Craig's outlook on things like guns and heights has nothing to do with his performance! He is an actor, therefore being afraid of heights and hating guns is irrelavent as he is being paid to act as someone else, he portrays "a character" not himself, thats what he is trained to do, and thats what he did! They are looking at this the wrong way.
Just neeeded to get that off my chest
and if you misunderstood it the first time i'll say it again, Daniel Craig is playing the character of James Bond, a character who isn't afraid of heights and who doesn't hate guns, therefore it doesn't matter that Daniel Craig hates guns or heights, the point it he is playing someone else!
i was randommly browsing the Cnb website and found this, it s by far one of the funniest things i have ever seen! Its basically a video review of Casino Royale by one of the Craig-Haters.
I can't belive that CnB are using this as part of their of their campaign against Casino Royale, i mean i watched this and laughed all the way through (quietly though as my flatmates were sleeping). This guy looks as though he is on some illegal substance of some description, so if you're in need of a giggle then here's the link.
EDIT: After just over third of the video the guy says he saw CR twice in 2 days to see if his "Anger wasn't rash!" If you were that angered by it, why pay to see it again the day afer? Also he says "it is true to the the book" then goes on to say "which i've never actually read by the way" What is with that? AND he makes comments such as bond isnt supposed to have human emotions and that bond doesn't give a f**k about anyone! this guy angers me so much!
WARNING: CONTAINS LANGUAGE THAT MAY OFFEND SOME PEOPLE!
I recently went on this site and there is one thing on it that I think is absolutely pathetic; it's a so-called Q+A page in which Craig askes why people hate him so much. It truly is representative of the kind of people that are on the site. 8-)
"He’s a man way out there in the blue, riding on a smile and a shoeshine. And when they start not smiling back—that’s an earthquake. and then you get yourself a couple of spots on your hat, and you’re finished. Nobody dast blame this man. A salesman is got to dream, boy. It comes with the territory." Death of a Salesman
i was randommly browsing the Cnb website and found this, it s by far one of the funniest things i have ever seen! Its basically a video review of Casino Royale by one of the Craig-Haters.
I can't belive that CnB are using this as part of their of their campaign against Casino Royale, i mean i watched this and laughed all the way through (quietly though as my flatmates were sleeping). This guy looks as though he is on some illegal substance of some description, so if you're in need of a giggle then here's the link.
EDIT: After just over third of the video the guy says he saw CR twice in 2 days to see if his "Anger wasn't rash!" If you were that angered by it, why pay to see it again the day afer? Also he says "it is true to the the book" then goes on to say "which i've never actually read by the way" What is with that? AND he makes comments such as bond isnt supposed to have human emotions and that bond doesn't give a f**k about anyone! this guy angers me so much!
WARNING: CONTAINS LANGUAGE THAT MAY OFFEND SOME PEOPLE!
That dumb, wierd, offensive, sad kid deserves a good slap!! But just goes to show the gutter-level they have reached, when this kind of material CnB endorses now to back up their argument.
Comments
http://www.danielcraigisnotbond.com/FansScrutinizeMistakesInCasinoRoyale.html
They're really reaching at this point. Once you've tasted fame I think some people will stick with anything to keep that head above water.
By the way, I've noticed a homophobic attitude on the site. Who exactly is running that place?
Nice bit of irony in there ('I'm not homophobic; except for this homophobia I'm about to display'), but generally just terrifying- she's really revealed herself to be a proper dangerous nutcase. What a horrible woman.
Christ almighty- Pierce should be concerned that he has such dangerous and rabid fans. This is really worrying stuff.
This is just being in denial of the thruth and believing highly questionable conspiracy theories.
I'm sure much of the mainstream media is embarassed that they acknowledged its existence...
Think of the money they have raked in from the adverts, I wouldn't mind betting the whole thing was just to make money...
Having said that I am glad that opinion has turned away from supporting the idea!!
This was always my idea, fundamentalism is always a problem, and it is beetwen us. But fundamentalism for Brosnan is ridicolous, too.
Right, her time will come soon enough. She's running out of steam at this point. As I said in an earlier post, some people will do nearly anything to maintain fame. At this point, the site is a joke. But soon it won't even be funny anymore. This was the woman's 15 minutes. Long ago she should have cashed in, accepted her small role in the history of bond, and stepped out of the stage light. Unfortunately for her, she's dug herself into a really deep hole. Tact, tact tact. This is what is really lacking here. The joke has gone on far too long.
It's far from funny now- she's clearly in need of help- quite seriously. She sounds dangerously fanatical and presents quite repulsive opinions.
You nailed it - be here, have fun but keep the lines between real life and fiction clear. Much much respect for your post TC {[]
And now McClory's dead, there'll be no second coming!
Roger Moore 1927-2017
007 MAY BE THEIR IQ
{[]
Thanks, it was on Amazon US and I just ordered it. {[]
if you look on the front page of the site and scroll down a bit there are 3 pictures, one of brosnan, a drawing of bond brepresenting ian fleming's vision of bond and a picture of daniel craig.
the point being that they think pierce brosnan (who i do like) is more appropriate for ian fleming's vision of bond, but when i looked at iti found that the image of daniel craig (taken from the CR teaser) looks amazingly similar to the ian flemings drawing, thus proving (to me that is) that Mr Fleming would have been very pleased with the choice of daniel craig as bond.
if you havent noticed this i suggest you check it out.
CnB.com should really take more time researching for information and appropriate opinions before posting stuff like this on their website.
Indeed it looks considerable more like DC than PB. Almost like it could have been drawn from a photo of him.
so CnB, give it a rest, please your time has passed.
anyway guys, how likely do we think it is we will get a new site, like CnB when in a few years time we have another new Bond?
or will CnB resurface at that far off time campaigning for more Brosnan, or will it all be thankfully over? comments?
Solaris
Agreed . . . the woman who runs that site is a total quack. I think it's obvious by now that's she's completely delusional. Craig has more than proven himself to be a phenomenal 007. Bond's movie future, I think, is bright . . .!
There are plenty of Brosnan Websites, so go to one of them... and the movie hasn't (and won't) won the 1 boxoffice in U.S. but worldwide... well, sort of.
But something is true: the "hype" is over... like with DAD, so it happens to be normal, no a boycott.
Sorry lady, yet i kinda admire you... back then in 1995 if i had internet, money and my current knowledge (or againg, internet) i would make PierceNotBond and create a Boycott to bring Dalton again. My brothers would do the same with some sort of MoreBondMoore...
they are opinions... but i must be honest, i've read important ones over here.
it is a shame it is still runing, because.. it is to late (not wrong, just late: it wont happen, you can't win them all)
I thought all along that this woman was actually mentally unstable. Now this just confirms what I originally thought. I do believe she could be a danger to society now, and if I was Brosnan or Craig I would be slightly concerned by her wierd, obsessive views. Is this a female version of Mark Chapman or what....:o
The police should only be arresting one person here, if only to prevent her from doing damage to herself....or others!!!
Ironically,whatever her age may be,"Kitn"(how cute a name is that?)probably did more to help Daniel Craig and Casino Royale than she ever could've imagined.The free publicity she created for them--and for Eon,too--was ultimately more beneficial than harmful.
Hopefully she'll calm down,stop calling people names, and get a life.Why she got SO worked up over a movie is difficult to comprehend.It's not as if everyone absolutely,positively, must see this film whether they want to or not.
When they bang on about how the hate the fact the Daniel Craig was cast as James Bond they mostly seem to base their grounds for hating him on Craig as a person not an actor. For example, they think he was a bad choice for Bond as he hates guns, is afraid of heights etc. I mean for heavens sake, Craig's outlook on things like guns and heights has nothing to do with his performance! He is an actor, therefore being afraid of heights and hating guns is irrelavent as he is being paid to act as someone else, he portrays "a character" not himself, thats what he is trained to do, and thats what he did! They are looking at this the wrong way.
Just neeeded to get that off my chest
and if you misunderstood it the first time i'll say it again, Daniel Craig is playing the character of James Bond, a character who isn't afraid of heights and who doesn't hate guns, therefore it doesn't matter that Daniel Craig hates guns or heights, the point it he is playing someone else!
i was randommly browsing the Cnb website and found this, it s by far one of the funniest things i have ever seen! Its basically a video review of Casino Royale by one of the Craig-Haters.
I can't belive that CnB are using this as part of their of their campaign against Casino Royale, i mean i watched this and laughed all the way through (quietly though as my flatmates were sleeping). This guy looks as though he is on some illegal substance of some description, so if you're in need of a giggle then here's the link.
EDIT: After just over third of the video the guy says he saw CR twice in 2 days to see if his "Anger wasn't rash!" If you were that angered by it, why pay to see it again the day afer? Also he says "it is true to the the book" then goes on to say "which i've never actually read by the way" What is with that? AND he makes comments such as bond isnt supposed to have human emotions and that bond doesn't give a f**k about anyone! this guy angers me so much!
WARNING: CONTAINS LANGUAGE THAT MAY OFFEND SOME PEOPLE!
http://www.danielcraigisnotbond.com/ZollyBestReview.html
That dumb, wierd, offensive, sad kid deserves a good slap!! But just goes to show the gutter-level they have reached, when this kind of material CnB endorses now to back up their argument.