Craig on Bond 22

HardyboyHardyboy Posts: 5,906Chief of Staff
Nevermind the silly headline about Craig not being in shape (just what the anti-Craigers need--more ammo!)--here's what's really important: Daniel Craig talks about the next Bond film!

Source: International Herald Tribune

James Bond Star Daniel Craig Says He's A Bit Out Of Shape

The Associated Press, May 22, 2007

CANNES, France: James Bond says his rippling muscles have gone a little flabby.

Bond star Daniel Craig told reporters at the Cannes Film Festival that he had let himself go a little since putting himself through a tough fitness regimen for "Casino Royale."

"I had some down time," Craig said Monday. "I got to enjoy myself a bit. I'm getting back into shape now, I'm kind of building myself up again."

Craig, 39, said the script had not been finalized for the next Bond film, which does not yet have a title.

The last 007 film was "very successful," Craig said. "We have to make the next one, I think, better than the last one to keep people happy."

Craig was in Cannes for a preview of "The Golden Compass," a fantasy adventure that also stars Nicole Kidman. It will hit screens worldwide in December.
Vox clamantis in deserto

Comments

  • Mr MartiniMr Martini That nice house in the sky.Posts: 2,707MI6 Agent
    Thanks for the article HB. Very interesting. Maybe once Craig see's the script he'll drop some hints as to what it's about.
    Some people would complain even if you hang them with a new rope
  • jboyjboy Posts: 42MI6 Agent
    Hardyboy wrote:
    (just what the anti-Craigers need--more ammo

    I think the anti-Craigers are pretty much out of ammo and are out of the game...
  • HardyboyHardyboy Posts: 5,906Chief of Staff
    jboy wrote:
    Hardyboy wrote:
    (just what the anti-Craigers need--more ammo

    I think the anti-Craigers are pretty much out of ammo and are out of the game...

    Oh, jboy, if only it were true! Just for you, I violated my personal rule of never going to that vile anti-Craig website, and look what I found at the bottom of the main page:

    The Boycott continues!

    The casino Royal Boycott continues into the DVD release, the pay per view release and Video Rentals. Tens of thousands of movie goers walked out of movie theaters in protest. Millions more made a strong statement by not going to the movie at all.

    The Boycott had an undeniable effect, the American Box Office take is $20 million under possible expectations. Academy Award winning Happy Feet took home an Oscar as well as
    $197,865,227 to nest with. Casino Royale on the other hand secured $167,007,184 domestically. While Die Another Day in comparison brought home $183,500,000 (Inflated Grosses for 2006).


    The studio and producers know there are unhappy funs and also know millions of dollars were missed out on because of their mistaken choice of Daniel Craig.

    The Boycott will continue as long as Daniel Craig is employed as 007.

    Where to begin, where to begin. . .Tens of thousands of people walked out? The boycott is responsible for CR making only $167 mil in the U.S. (nevermind the fact it was still in the top 10 at the American B.O., and forget about the $400 mil-plus it took around the world)? And they're still insisting that the success of a singing, dancing children's movie reflects poorly on a Bond film? I'm afraid the game is still on for these wingnuts!
    Vox clamantis in deserto
  • bluemanblueman PDXPosts: 1,667MI6 Agent
    Wow. Some serious MH issues there...just not reality-based. :(
  • LoeffelholzLoeffelholz The United States, With LovePosts: 8,998Quartermasters
    I'm glad the craigisnotbond* people are around---#22 wouldn't be the same without them...They perform a role very similar to that of a rodeo clown :))

    *ohyesheis :v
    Check out my Amazon author page! Mark Loeffelholz
    "I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
    "Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
  • bluemanblueman PDXPosts: 1,667MI6 Agent
    I'm glad the craigisnotbondpeople are around---#22 wouldn't be the same without them...They perform a role very similar to that of a rodeo clown on a suicide watch :))


    Fixed it for you. ;)
  • LoeffelholzLoeffelholz The United States, With LovePosts: 8,998Quartermasters
    blueman wrote:
    I'm glad the craigisnotbondpeople are around---#22 wouldn't be the same without them...They perform a role very similar to that of a rodeo clown on a suicide watch :))


    Fixed it for you. ;)

    Wow! Yes you did! Thanks; much appreciated! :)
    Check out my Amazon author page! Mark Loeffelholz
    "I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
    "Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
  • PredatorPredator Posts: 790Chief of Staff
    Ah, what would we all do without our bilious "cousins in the attic" over at CinB?

    This time last year there were no laughs, but given their tenuous grip on reality and the laughable attempts at spin, I find them a diverting interest. Care in the (Bond) community and all that :))

    As for the thousands walking out ... perhaps millions actually walked out in protest that the film had ended?

    My only pet peev about that comment is the parochial North American/"Domestic" view. I'm sorry, but you got to look at the world view my deluded little friends.
  • jetsetwillyjetsetwilly Liverpool, UKPosts: 1,048MI6 Agent
    edited May 2007
    Hardyboy wrote:
    Millions more made a strong statement by not going to the movie at all.

    Genius. Millions? I assume they are saying that anyone, anywhere, who hasn't seen the film, was doing so in protest at Craig's casting? That's fantastic. Does that mean I have inadvertantly boycotted 99% of films released between the year I was born and today? I feel so guilty. All those great films that suffered because of my cruel acts. All those artists who went hungry. And does this include films released abroad and not in the UK? And what about other media? Have I boycotted the vast majority of music released in that time? When I watch BBC1, does that mean I am boycotting every other tv channel? What if I flick during the adverts in Coronation Street - is that a boycott against the adverts, the tv programme (because I am missing part of its half hour schedule) or is it a boycott of all of ITV? And does visiting AJB mean that I am boycotting the entire internet even as I sit here?

    What can I say? I'm clearly a highly principled person. Even though I didn't know it.
    Founder of the Wint & Kidd Appreciation Society.

    @merseytart
  • DAWUSSDAWUSS My homepagePosts: 517MI6 Agent
    I just wonder what's going to happen when Bond number 7 is selected...
  • LoeffelholzLoeffelholz The United States, With LovePosts: 8,998Quartermasters
    edited June 2007
    DAWUSS wrote:
    I just wonder what's going to happen when Bond number 7 is selected...

    See: All posts made on this site, from 14 Oct 2005 thru early November, 2006 :s

    :D
    Check out my Amazon author page! Mark Loeffelholz
    "I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
    "Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
  • jetsetwillyjetsetwilly Liverpool, UKPosts: 1,048MI6 Agent
    All posts? Including yours?
    Founder of the Wint & Kidd Appreciation Society.

    @merseytart
  • bluemanblueman PDXPosts: 1,667MI6 Agent
    edited June 2007
    Just think if this board had existed when Brosnan got the nod, the back and forth would've rivaled what we saw (er, and participated in ;% ) with Craig. I was quite hopeful when Brosnan took over...
  • DAWUSSDAWUSS My homepagePosts: 517MI6 Agent
    blueman wrote:
    Just think if this board had existed when Brosnan got the nod, the back and forth would've rivaled what we saw (er, and participated in ;% ) with Craig. I was quite hopeful when Brosnan took over...


    I wondered that a few weeks ago... ie, what if the '70's had the Internet - what would people's responses be to Connery returning as Bond for one last film, the nomination of Roger Moore...
  • Dan SameDan Same Victoria, AustraliaPosts: 6,054MI6 Agent
    blueman wrote:
    Just think if this board had existed when Brosnan got the nod, the back and forth would've rivaled what we saw (er, and participated in ;% ) with Craig.
    I doubt that. For one thing, Brosnan, love him or hate him, wasn't as bold a choice as Craig, but for another thing, Brosnan was set to be Bond in the late 80's untl his Remington Steele obligations prevented him from taking the role.

    I would argue that Brosnan's selection as Bond wouldn't have invited much discussion, however the selections of Lazenby and Dalton would have.
    "He’s a man way out there in the blue, riding on a smile and a shoeshine. And when they start not smiling back—that’s an earthquake. and then you get yourself a couple of spots on your hat, and you’re finished. Nobody dast blame this man. A salesman is got to dream, boy. It comes with the territory." Death of a Salesman
  • bluemanblueman PDXPosts: 1,667MI6 Agent
    Oh Dan, there was quite a concern with Brosnan for some: too slight, a TV star and hence it may not translate to the big screen, too smarmy. There were advocates, yes, but also detractors. At least that I was aware of. I was of the former persuasion (yes believe it or not), albeit hedgingly...I hoped he'd be able to tackle the role, I'd seen both good and bad from him, so comcerns were in the mix.

    I think Loeff is correct in his thinking, ANY change of Bond actor will elicit knee-jerking of some magnitude from some fans. Dalton had his share, Brosnan too. Goes with the territory.
  • LoeffelholzLoeffelholz The United States, With LovePosts: 8,998Quartermasters
    edited June 2007
    All posts? Including yours?

    Of course. ?:) Not really sure what you're getting at...

    "All" means all. Those in favour, those against...all. I'd like to think that I'll have a similar stance on Bond Actor #7 as I did when (Formerly) Poor DannyTM was first cast: i.e., give the fellow a chance.

    The past is often a portent of the future; hence the value of history.
    Check out my Amazon author page! Mark Loeffelholz
    "I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
    "Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
  • John DrakeJohn Drake On assignmentPosts: 2,564MI6 Agent
    As far as I can remember Brosnan got a decent ride from the UK press in 94. I can't recall how they reacted in 85, when he was briefly named as Roger Moore's successor.
  • arthur pringlearthur pringle SpacePosts: 366MI6 Agent
    DAWUSS wrote:
    I just wonder what's going to happen when Bond number 7 is selected...

    I suppose CNB could always change the name of their site to DanielCraigwasnotJamesBond.com...
  • LoeffelholzLoeffelholz The United States, With LovePosts: 8,998Quartermasters
    I suppose CNB could always change the name of their site to DanielCraigwasnotJamesBond.com...

    Magnificent {[]

    As ever, I tip my hat to Mr. Pringle -{
    Check out my Amazon author page! Mark Loeffelholz
    "I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
    "Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
  • youknowmynameyouknowmyname Gainesville, FL, USAPosts: 703MI6 Agent
    DAWUSS wrote:
    blueman wrote:
    Just think if this board had existed when Brosnan got the nod, the back and forth would've rivaled what we saw (er, and participated in ;% ) with Craig. I was quite hopeful when Brosnan took over...


    I wondered that a few weeks ago... ie, what if the '70's had the Internet - what would people's responses be to Connery returning as Bond for one last film, the nomination of Roger Moore...

    I hope there would have been some naysayers to the Connery return...at least since it eternally enshrined the nasty battle between Sony and MGM over Thunderball rights. As for Moore, he was a man of his age, although there might've very well been a moorenotbond.com site. Of course, every time there is a new Bond there will be naysayers, who obviously know more than the producers of one of the most successful movie franchises ever (note slight degree of sarcasm)!
    "We have all the time in the world..."
  • Dan SameDan Same Victoria, AustraliaPosts: 6,054MI6 Agent
    edited June 2007
    Of course, every time there is a new Bond there will be naysayers, who obviously know more than the producers of one of the most successful movie franchises ever (note slight degree of sarcasm)!
    Except that most naysayers are not objecting for reasons of box office but for reasons of taste. You're right that when it comes to picking a Bond who will make alot of money, the producers know best. But when it comes to picking a Bond who is simply good, well, the producers do not necessarily know more than other people. ;)
    "He’s a man way out there in the blue, riding on a smile and a shoeshine. And when they start not smiling back—that’s an earthquake. and then you get yourself a couple of spots on your hat, and you’re finished. Nobody dast blame this man. A salesman is got to dream, boy. It comes with the territory." Death of a Salesman
  • youknowmynameyouknowmyname Gainesville, FL, USAPosts: 703MI6 Agent
    [/quote]Except that most naysayers are not objecting for reasons of box office but for reasons of taste. You're right that when it comes to picking a Bond who will make alot of money, the producers know best. But when it comes to picking a Bond who is simply good, well, the producers do not necessarily know more than other people. ;)[/quote]

    However, I would venture to say that if the new Bond choice fits your taste you are bound to pay for the movie. Apparently over nearly 50 years the producers have made some small mistakes, but have consistently produced Bond movies and actors who have met people's tastes enough for those people to pay at the box office. Now when it comes to individual tastes, well nobody knows better than themselves who they like and why they like them, of course producers can't match everyone's individual tastes. All I am saying is that the taste of the naysayers is a small minority, and that the producers are skilled enough to choose a Bond who meets the tastes of the masses, and they have not done too bad a job at staying true to the Bond character at the same time(although there have been temporary lapses).

    Had enough of this forum? Go comment on the forum "Burlesque of Bond" in James Bond Events...

    P.S. Dan Same, you're from Australia? I am moving to New Zealand in a month and a half, what is the beat like on the Bond scene in the South Pacific?
    "We have all the time in the world..."
Sign In or Register to comment.