Most unfairly bashed Bond films?

MrP009MrP009 Posts: 4MI6 Agent
What films to folks here think are the most unfairly treated ones by fans and critics?

Many people think Moonraker is bad. And indeed it really is just a series of attempts on 007's life with a story built around it. But I have always appreciated the films special effects, its humor, and its over all concept. It was a film with lots of eye candy, in more ways than one.
«1

Comments

  • Sweepy the CatSweepy the Cat Halifax, West Yorkshire, EnglaPosts: 986MI6 Agent
    IMO there are only 4 actually 'Bad' Bond films.

    1)MR
    2)AVTAK
    3)TWINE
    4)DAD
    207qoznfl4.gif
  • KronsteenKronsteen Posts: 28MI6 Agent
    I watched TMWTGG tonight. It is regularly bashed by many people and branded as one of the bottom 3 (with DAD and MR).

    However, I think the movie has several interesting things about it
    - Great villain portrayed by the great Christopher Lee
    - Exotic locations : Hong Kong is nice, Bangkok even better. The boat chase on the floating market would be perfect if it wasn't for JW Pepper.
    The MI6 HQ in the Queen Elizabeth is an interesting idea
    - Bond hits Andrea, Moorehas never looked so ruthless after that until FYEO.
    - John Barry score

    On the negative side, several elements make the overall movie a missed effort :
    - JW Pepper
    - AMC product placement
    - Why does Hip run away with the car after the Karate School ? Makes absolutely no sense.
    - Scaramanga's lackluster death
    - John Barry score : while some cues are great (Looking for Scaramanga's Island, Hip's Trip), other ones feel dated and don't make the cut for me (Kung Fu fight and other cues that don't appear on the soundtrack CD).
    - The flying car
    - The "whistle" :))

    Overall, I enjoyed watching TMWTGG very much tonight, while seeing the DAD DVD in my collection makes me turn away (I have never watched it since I saw it at the cinema).
  • HigginsHiggins GermanyPosts: 16,619MI6 Agent
    Sorry, but I don't get the difference between the most over/underrated film and now the most unfairly bashed movie
    President of the 'Misty Eyes Club'.

    Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
  • Dan SameDan Same Victoria, AustraliaPosts: 6,054MI6 Agent
    Kronsteen wrote:
    Bond hits Andrea, Moorehas never looked so ruthless after that until FYEO.
    What about TSWLM? :o In that masterpiece, Bond killed Sandor in cold blood (IMO the most ruthless killing in all the Bond films) and also shot Stromberg in a manner, that in terms of ruthlessness, must surely rank among the top killings in all the Bond films. :D
    "He’s a man way out there in the blue, riding on a smile and a shoeshine. And when they start not smiling back—that’s an earthquake. and then you get yourself a couple of spots on your hat, and you’re finished. Nobody dast blame this man. A salesman is got to dream, boy. It comes with the territory." Death of a Salesman
  • emtiememtiem SurreyPosts: 5,948MI6 Agent
    MrP009 wrote:
    What films to folks here think are the most unfairly treated ones by fans and critics?

    Casino Royale got a pasting around here before anyone had seen it. That was pretty unfair.
  • LoeffelholzLoeffelholz The United States, With LovePosts: 8,998Quartermasters
    emtiem wrote:
    MrP009 wrote:
    What films to folks here think are the most unfairly treated ones by fans and critics?

    Casino Royale got a pasting around here before anyone had seen it. That was pretty unfair.

    True enough; CR gets my vote.
    Check out my Amazon author page! Mark Loeffelholz
    "I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
    "Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
  • KronsteenKronsteen Posts: 28MI6 Agent
    Dan Same wrote:
    Kronsteen wrote:
    Bond hits Andrea, Moorehas never looked so ruthless after that until FYEO.
    What about TSWLM? :o In that masterpiece, Bond killed Sandor in cold blood (IMO the most ruthless killing in all the Bond films) and also shot Stromberg in a manner, that in terms of ruthlessness, must surely rank among the top killings in all the Bond films. :D

    You are right, how could I forget about that ? :o
    My mind was still clouded with reminiscenses of MR.
  • Scribe74Scribe74 San FranciscoPosts: 149MI6 Agent
    I'd agree with those who've mentioned CASINO ROYALE.

    I also have to say that I enjoyed Dalton's two outings as Bond. Certainly, they're not the best in the series . . . but they're not as bad as some people claim them to be. I liked Dalton's more serious approach tot he character.
  • Lazenby880Lazenby880 LondonPosts: 525MI6 Agent
    Moonraker. This picture gets pasted pretty much every time it comes up for discussion which is very unfair. For me it is the highpoint of the Moore era, in the sense that the 'Moore formula' - preposterous plots, sight gags, humour all round - is perfected here. The humour is incredibly well-judged and very British, the crack about the 80-year-olds, afternoon tea being Britain's one indisputable contribution to the world and the brilliant sight of Bond, M and the Minister visiting Drax wearing gas masks.

    There are also some wonderfully crafted moments of tension, such as the centrifuge scene which everyone seems to acknowledge as a gold nugget. But what about the scene where Bond and Drax go shooting, Jaws attacking the girl in Rio, or the excellent fight in Venice? Lest we forget Dufour being hunted down by the dogs at Drax's estate, surely one of the darkest moments in the Bond series.

    And while some may feel the dual character of the film - humour on the one hand, thrillerish elements on the other - as a downside, I actually view it as a strength. As a piece of entertainment it is ludicrously good fun; even the rampant commercialism - all those 70s billboards in Brazil - gives it a superb vintage atmosphere. Finally there is the finale, with a laser gun battle in space that is very well filmed (the production values in general are very high indeed in Moonraker).

    Would I like every film to be like Moonraker? No. In fact, I much prefer the likes of The Living Daylights, Casino Royale and On Her Majesty's Secret Service. Nevertheless, for excellent entertainment on a rainy day you cannot get much better than Moonraker, as it *is* possible to like both fun and silly Bonds and fun and serious Bonds, albeit liking one more than the other.
  • sambwoysambwoy Berkshire, EnglandPosts: 90MI6 Agent
    Whilst I don't agree that this one doesn't get bashed to the same extent as Moonraker, I think Licence To Kill is one that seems to sharply divide critics and fans. For people who prefer their Bonds to be more down-to-earth and realistic, it is probably the best Bond film since, well, The Living Daylights, I guess. On the other hand, those who cling to the true cinematic 007 probably had to wait on until possibly GoldenEye, which I think, judging by popular opinion and the way that Die Another Day seems to get bashed a lot, there probably wasn't a true critically-acclaimed Bond after that until Casino Royale. Tomorrow Never Dies I must say I like a lot more now than I used to, whereas TWINE I never fully enjoyed.

    I think the Empire review of Licence To Kill was a little unfair. I got the Ultimate Edition DVD simply for the special features, and the film looks much better on DVD than it ever did on VHS.
  • HardyboyHardyboy Posts: 5,906Chief of Staff
    OK, I'll say it: Die Another Day. Is it a great Bond film? No. Is it even a good one? Maybe not. But the vehemence of some fans toward this movie just astonishes me. You'd think that it was a snuff film written by Goebbels, directed by Charles Manson, produced by Stalin, and starring Pee-Wee Herman, Divine, and Sonny Tufts. Geeze, it's not that bad. And, please, people, don't anyone respond to this post by bashing DAD. We've got a whole thread devoted to that.
    Vox clamantis in deserto
  • Napoleon PluralNapoleon Plural LondonPosts: 10,467MI6 Agent
    True, the bashing is beyond the pale in the cold light of day and like HB says we don't need the details here. But in terms of how DAD made me feel, it is off the scale. On the other hand, MR has more silliness than I can shake a stick at, but it feels fine to me. It's not strictly rational or what you can tot up, but then the emotions a movie can generate seldom are.

    Guess I'd nominate AVTAK but I don't mind people bashing it. Again, I feel great watching it, just like the style of it. :)
    "This is where we leave you Mr Bond."

    Roger Moore 1927-2017
  • Moores Left EyebrowMoores Left Eyebrow Posts: 27MI6 Agent
    I wouldn't say DAD is 'unfairly bashed' as in my opinion its the worst of the Bond enteries.

    In my opinion - ANY of the Moore films is unfairly bashed. ;)
  • Lazenby880Lazenby880 LondonPosts: 525MI6 Agent
    edited August 2008
    True, the bashing is beyond the pale in the cold light of day and like HB says we don't need the details here. But in terms of how DAD made me feel, it is off the scale. On the other hand, MR has more silliness than I can shake a stick at, but it feels fine to me. It's not strictly rational or what you can tot up, but then the emotions a movie can generate seldom are.
    Perhaps it is because Moonraker has good production values and is actually very well made for all its silliness, while Die Another Day is, well, not.

    To recap:

    Moonraker - Silliness well-executed.

    Die Another Day - Bond well-executed.

    Hopefully that doesn't count as bashing.
  • Dan SameDan Same Victoria, AustraliaPosts: 6,054MI6 Agent
    Lazenby880 wrote:
    To recap:

    Moonraker - Silliness well-executed.

    Die Another Day - Bond well-executed.
    I don't think that DAD is anything well-executed. ;) :#
    "He’s a man way out there in the blue, riding on a smile and a shoeshine. And when they start not smiling back—that’s an earthquake. and then you get yourself a couple of spots on your hat, and you’re finished. Nobody dast blame this man. A salesman is got to dream, boy. It comes with the territory." Death of a Salesman
  • Lazenby880Lazenby880 LondonPosts: 525MI6 Agent
    edited August 2008
    Dan Same wrote:
    Lazenby880 wrote:
    To recap:

    Moonraker - Silliness well-executed.

    Die Another Day - Bond well-executed.
    I don't think that DAD is anything well-executed. ;) :#
    Well, as far as I am concerned Die Another Day executes the character of Bond fairly comprehensively! :o ;)

    I don't wish to bash the thing though; as Hardyboy points put there is plenty opportunity for that elsewhere. So I'll big up the positive: Rosamund Pike is great. :D
  • HardyboyHardyboy Posts: 5,906Chief of Staff
    A couple of the responses to my post are more-or-less proving my point: there's an attitude out there that DAD is so phenomenally bad that there's no way you can bash it enough. Sorry, but I just don't think any Bond film--including the ones I put at the very bottom of my list--is so putrid that you can't find one or two good things to say about it. Last night I watched a truly appalling film--the U.S. version of Funny Games--and I say without exaggeration that I'd rather be forced to watch DAD every single night for a year than have to watch FG just one more time. Again, there are far worse insults to celluloid than DAD.
    Vox clamantis in deserto
  • Lazenby880Lazenby880 LondonPosts: 525MI6 Agent
    edited August 2008
    Hardyboy wrote:
    A couple of the responses to my post are more-or-less proving my point: there's an attitude out there that DAD is so phenomenally bad that there's no way you can bash it enough.
    It is just a bit of fun though. I don't think anyone says it is actually offensive or anything like that. Some of us just happen to think it is a very bad film. There are those who vocalise that dislike more than others I suppose, so I can understand that fans of the film must tire of the criticism. (Then again, some people criticise films I like all the time, such as Casino Royale, yet I don't believe they shouldn't write whatever they want about the film).
    Hardyboy wrote:
    Sorry, but I just don't think any Bond film--including the ones I put at the very bottom of my list--is so putrid that you can't find one or two good things to say about it.
    Well then, you are more of a Bond fan than I could hope to be! Seriously though, couldn't the same be said for most films? There are many films I have watched and disliked, even detested, and there will usually be *something* in it I can appreciate. Although I do try to point out the positives in films I dislike when reviewing or discussing them (like, for instance, DAD, Diamonds Are Forever or Titanic), I think it is a bit silly to refrain from criticism just because it is a Bond film.
    Hardyboy wrote:
    Again, there are far worse insults to celluloid than DAD.
    That is true, in my opinion as well as your opinion. However some people feel genuinely that DAD is utter crap. Those people sometimes voice that opinion. If they explain why they hold that opinion I don't see any harm in it - the best thing to do surely is defend the film in response.
  • HardyboyHardyboy Posts: 5,906Chief of Staff
    Lazenby880 wrote:
    There are those who vocalise that dislike more than others I suppose, so I can understand that fans of the film must tire of the criticism. (Then again, some people criticise films I like all the time, such as Casino Royale, yet I don't believe they shouldn't write whatever they want about the film).

    L880, my view is NOT that people shouldn't criticize the film (and I'm not a huge fan of DAD myself); I am simply taking the topic at face value and pointing out a movie that I believe is unfairly bashed. There are criticisms leveled against the film that I feel are fair and with which I agree; but DAD seems to generate such hyperbolic overreactions that you'd think the movie was on the level of the killer video from The Ring. Let me draw a comparison between the kind of bashing I think is legitimate and that I find over the top:

    "DAD has a good first half that's negated by a terrible second half." FAIR.

    "DAD is just so bad from the second it begins until the second it ends that it has to rank as the worst thing put on film since the Lumiere brothers introduced narrative film, ca. 1900." UNFAIR.

    "DAD is ruined by OTT gimmicks like a laser satellite, a face-changing machine, and an invisible car." FAIR.

    "DAD has a cameo by Madonna, so Mickey and Babs should be brought to The Hague on charges of committing crimes against humanity." UNFAIR.

    It's the exaggerations, the melodrama, the vitriol, and the just plain silliness in some of the criticisms that I object to. If some people don't like DAD, fine; if they have legitimate gripes, air 'em; I just wish they'd stop acting like DAD is an abomination against man, God, and nature.
    Vox clamantis in deserto
  • Lazenby880Lazenby880 LondonPosts: 525MI6 Agent
    edited August 2008
    Hardyboy wrote:
    L880, my view is NOT that people shouldn't criticize the film (and I'm not a huge fan of DAD myself); I am simply taking the topic at face value and pointing out a movie that I believe is unfairly bashed.
    Fair enough Hardy. I take your point about the original intention of the topic. So much is dependent on one's own view on the film in relation to a discussion of whether the bashing it receives is fair or not. I suppose I was looking for a defence of the film's positive points, rather than something of a condemnation of the ostensibly extreme reactions caused by Brosnan's swansong! And anyway, are the reactions that extreme? I cannot speak for anyone else, but I don't recall calling for Mick 'n' Babs trial at the Hague (if only because they redeemed themselves with Casino Royale). ;) However, I *do* think it is a *very* poor film right from the beginning - is that extreme or illegitimate?

    Even though I disagree with the criticisms, leading to bashing, of Moonraker, Casino Royale and Licence to Kill, I employ Evelyn Beatrice Hall's maxim: "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it". For instance, I have read many opinions basically alleging that Timothy Dalton is little more than a slightly warmed corpse in LTK. Now I disagree with those opinions, and will happily debate them, but if it is a legitimately held opinion then that is fair enough. And on issues like opinions on films or actors, who is to say what is legitimate criticism?†



    † Unless, of course, those criticisms are very personal in nature, such as those directed towards DC after his casting.
  • Napoleon PluralNapoleon Plural LondonPosts: 10,467MI6 Agent
    You can tell some of us have an academic background where we start off my dissecting the premise... :D It's like the beginning of some A-level history essay.
    "This is where we leave you Mr Bond."

    Roger Moore 1927-2017
  • Dan SameDan Same Victoria, AustraliaPosts: 6,054MI6 Agent
    It's like the beginning of some A-level history essay.
    :# I had never heard of that term until I joined this site and countless people started posting about the attitudes towards the Bond girls over the years. :s One would be forgiven for thinking that they were in the same class or something. :))
    "He’s a man way out there in the blue, riding on a smile and a shoeshine. And when they start not smiling back—that’s an earthquake. and then you get yourself a couple of spots on your hat, and you’re finished. Nobody dast blame this man. A salesman is got to dream, boy. It comes with the territory." Death of a Salesman
  • dom cleodom cleo Posts: 3MI6 Agent
    i had no idea that people disliked The Man With The Golden Gun so much. I think it's one of the better ones. the only thing i didn't like about it was the rediculous ending in the villain's lair, but that's true for most bond films.

    christopher lee was an excellent bad guy. roger moore looked good. the sherrif was funny. the chase scenes were exciting. the bond girls were got. the midget was a butler and an assassin. bond has a third nipple. what more do you people want?
  • LoeffelholzLoeffelholz The United States, With LovePosts: 8,998Quartermasters
    dom cleo wrote:
    i had no idea that people disliked The Man With The Golden Gun so much. I think it's one of the better ones. the only thing i didn't like about it was the rediculous ending in the villain's lair, but that's true for most bond films.

    christopher lee was an excellent bad guy. roger moore looked good. the sherrif was funny. the chase scenes were exciting. the bond girls were got. the midget was a butler and an assassin. bond has a third nipple. what more do you people want?

    I'm pretty much with you, dom. TMWTGG isn't in the top half of my favourites list, but it's not at the bottom, either. I've always liked it...but then I afford films like DAF a lot more forgiveness than most people here, as well.
    Check out my Amazon author page! Mark Loeffelholz
    "I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
    "Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
  • Barry NelsonBarry Nelson ChicagoPosts: 1,508MI6 Agent
    Add my voice to those that liked TMWTGG, I find it very entertaining. But, since that has been mentioned several times I will nominate another Bond film that gets a lot of unfair bashing, LTK. I really enjoyed the film, Dalton was good, Carey Lowell was a capable woman without seemingly trying to diminish Bond, Sanchez was a great villian, Del Toro a menacing henchman, I enjoyed the climatic big rig chase down the mountain and Bond's romantic jump in the pool at the end was clever. I think it had a lot to like.
  • Colonel ShatnerColonel Shatner Chavtastic Bristol, BritainPosts: 574MI6 Agent
    I'd say that Tomorrow Never Dies and Licence to Kill are both rather underrated Bond movies, while Moonraker was silly self-indulgence done right.
    'Alright guard, begin the unnecessarily slow moving dipping mechanism...'
  • DrMaybeDrMaybe Posts: 204MI6 Agent
    Most unfairly bashed Bond film, has to go to the Bond film that isn't one - Casino Royale(1967). Purists hate this *******ized psychedelic mess, with 5 directors and (I lost count) unknown quantity of writers. Even as scattergunned as it turned out, it was still one of the top grossing films of that year, due to these factors-

    Peter Sellers - who is very briefly on display, was at his peak. Always one of my favorite Brit comedians.

    Ursula Andress - Wow. Her second foray into Bond territory, she was way hotter than in Dr. No.

    Burt Bacharach/Hal David score - even if you hated the film, you couldn't hate the music - The Look of Love(Dusty Springfield), Herb Alpert and the Tijuana Brass. Possibly some of the best sounds in any Bond film.

    The imagery - Pure 60s psychedelia. You can't mistake this film for any other era. And a veritable army of beautiful women - more than 1 Bond could even handle, which explains why everyone was Bond.

    The cameos - everyone from Peter O'Toole, George Raft, Deborah Kerr, Jean Paul Belmondo, Charles Boyer etc. The list is too long to mention - a veritable who's who of film.

    Of the big spy satire send-ups, I'd rate it higher than the Flint and (embarassingly bad) Matt Helm series, and any of the one-shot attempts of that era.

    Someone else must have really liked it too, because they based the whole Austin Powers series on it.
  • The SidekickThe Sidekick Posts: 19MI6 Agent
    Lazenby880 wrote:
    True, the bashing is beyond the pale in the cold light of day and like HB says we don't need the details here. But in terms of how DAD made me feel, it is off the scale. On the other hand, MR has more silliness than I can shake a stick at, but it feels fine to me. It's not strictly rational or what you can tot up, but then the emotions a movie can generate seldom are.
    Perhaps it is because Moonraker has good production values and is actually very well made for all its silliness, while Die Another Day is, well, not.

    To recap:

    Moonraker - Silliness well-executed.

    Die Another Day - Bond well-executed.

    Hopefully that doesn't count as bashing.

    To add on,

    The Spy Who Loved Me - Stromberg Well Excuted
  • Colonel ShatnerColonel Shatner Chavtastic Bristol, BritainPosts: 574MI6 Agent
    edited August 2008
    Die Another Day was watchable and slickly made, with a decent plot in the first 40 or 50 minutes, but felt rather diffuse and souless.

    Even though GoldenEye gets praised to the stars I think it is similarily diffuse as well (but was better than DAD by being more gritty and having richer characters).
    'Alright guard, begin the unnecessarily slow moving dipping mechanism...'
  • bacaretbacaret ArizonaPosts: 73MI6 Agent
    how about twine alot of people bash this film, but I think it is a very good film. The boat chase is great elektra king is very sexy and how about those xray glasses,who wouldnt want a pair of those?
Sign In or Register to comment.