Bond's figting style
walther p99
NJPosts: 3,416MI6 Agent
Since most of the Bond actors have their own fighting style, which is your favorite and why and whats your least favorite. my favorite is Craigs becuase it fits with his special forces background and probably one a secret agent would have.
Comments
This is a bit of a pet subject for me, as I have studied Martial Arts for nearly as long as I have been a Bond fan/nerd (I think the two are linked)
I like DC's style, but I know it sounds weird but he may be a bit too skilled. He never looks in trouble to me, and I think that although to quote Fleming " Bond knows the basic holds of Ju-Jitsu" he is by no means an expert. True he founded the first Judo club at an English Public School (Fleming again) he disliked " being thrown about by that Damned Commando chap" every Thursday afternoon (if memory serves) He was also a shoolboy Boxer. Connery always seemed to get it right, the right mix of skills, tenacity and intelligence to out wit a superior foe (Odd Job, Red Grant etc) Dalton was also a breath of fresh air and I remember a cheer going up in the audience during the opening of LTD when he uses the not so gentlemanly Head-butt with great aplomp. I also liked Lazenby for his physicality. I hope to see a fight scene with DC where he clearly is outclassed, but manages to pull it out of the bag. That for me would be great, as we are in danger of Bond being Superman and he is much more than that.
Even his greatest fans would not I feel claim that Roger looked anything but awkward where fisticuffs and action were concerned, with the possible exception of LALD where he just about looks plausable. Brosnan got better with age, although the fight at the end of GE is one of the best in the series (again Bond wins by stealth)
so for me all except one of the Bond actors has brought something different to the overallfighting style of Bond.
Totally with you there, zaphod! It's time for Craigger to meet his own Red Grant, if you will---someone who very nearly gets the better of him, and forces him to do something drastic (and desperate) to beat him...even if it means a (gasp!) gadget, or some other form of 'cheating.'
All part of the Precious Classic FormulaTM...coming soon :007)
"I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
"Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
Call me a Traditionalist, call me out-dated and old-fashioned, but there's just one thing missing- Bond has to beat the main henchman* by using said nasty's main weapon against him, vis Grant's watch, Oddjob's hat, Jaws' teeth...
*Son Of Barbel tells me the current term is "Dragon" (eg Oddjob, Jaws), while that worthy's boss is the "Big Bad" (eg Goldfinger, Drax).
You're a traditionalist! You're out-dated and old-fashioned!...and apparently, we're in agreement on this issue... B-)
"I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
"Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
This is an interesting perspective. I think there is a problem with negotiating between realism and the needs of Cinema. I used to know Paul Weston who did a lot of stunt work on the Bond Movies, particularly with TD. He told me about another project where thay needed a Martial Artist and were blown away by his skills. However when seeing the rushes it was just a blur and somehow looked 'un-real', they needed to slow it down so an audince wasn't baffled. Apparently Bruce Lee was faster than he appeared on film and did the same thing. In a Martial Arts movie I guess that you are 'preaching to the converted' whereby the audience as a minimum has a specific interest in fighting styles, so you can push it further. For a general audience I feel that DC looks convincing and he moves very well which is the most important thing.
One area where I disagree with you is in " letting the stunt men do it" I think that no matter how well it's done it lacks something, and I really like DC's determination to do as much as he possibly can. I agree with you that less complex moves that allowed for a sense of Battle would raise the bar still further.
Oh yes, bring that on for sure. I would rather it was not a gadget, but either the guys own weapon/method, or better still in my view something from 'left field' like the electric fire in GF, or the ladder in GE...
...and proud of it too
That sounds familiar...I'm trying to recall the fighting style used to train Christian Bale for Batman Begins. That might be the one, but I haven't looked at those DVD extras for a couple of years ;%
"I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
"Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
If you do look at the extras the section where andy and justo show a combo and then its slowed down. After training with them you relise they're actually doing it slowly to start with!
www.scottacademymartialarts.co.uk
Being capable in martial arts is somthing Bond should have in his kit bag. But all the chi or Ki-Ai's in the world won't stop a bullet or a Louisville Slugger (baseball bat). Fighting for your life is fighting for your life, hence the electric heater in the bathtub in Goldfinger.
DG
"People sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." Richard Grenier after George Orwell, Washington Times 1993.
As for Bond - Craig definately has the most accomplished fighting style. Bourne-like, but not as unrealistic. He is a bit too polished for me though. Any martial artist reading this will know deep-down that however much they would like to, they would not get through a round/kumite/fight against a similarily matched opponant as chorigraphed and as perfect as this. However, Connery had the best mix of brawn, brains and instinct for me. A tough brawler with no rules. Give the guy a good beating, take a few yourself, then strangle him with a fire-poker. Nice!
http://apbateman.com
I agree, we always get students to practice any favorite combos/moves over and over on as many different people as possible so not only does it become second nature but because you've drilled it with guys bigger, smaller, faster or stronger you know how it needs to be tweeked to have the desired effect.
www.scottacademymartialarts.co.uk
Could not agree more. SC managed to convey what he was thinking in those crucial moments when all looks lost. I think DC could pull off the same thing, but he needs a worthy opponent, or a limitation such as an injury (the elevator fight in QOS was very smart once you slowed it down)
Slow it down? I literally took a sip of pepsi in the cinema and missed it!
It would be good to put DC's Bond up against a real bad ass and have him thrown off the walls for a bit, like an Odd Job or Jaws (but not so comic bookish) then have him slowly gain the advantage through cunning and ruthlessness.
http://apbateman.com
I think we are in violent agreement. It was on the third attempt and in super -slo-mo before the elevator moves were clear to me. That said, once you could see what went on it looked nice and sharp. In one of my earlier posts I said that we need to see Bond 'in trouble' possibly outclassed and having to rely on every ounce of wit and determination (being bounced off the walls would do nicely) I want to see Bond having to 'dig deep' to survive. The best fights for me often contain those small moments, like Brozzer carefully weighing up the ash tray in before using it in TND, or Connerry using the traitorous girl as a shield in GF (if she was not implicated in luring/trapping our man it would have been too mean/cruel to be cool)
DC has the physical ability, and is more than a subtle enough actor to show us what he is thinking during action. For me when you get that combination of character revealed in, and by, action, in a Bond movie, phew, there is nothing else like it.
Absolutely - -{
http://apbateman.com
I meant to say thanks in the first instance for kicking this off as a topic. I have really enjoyed it, and have also been pleasantly surprised by how many people have chosen to comment. Thanks a lot