Sean Connery [56] +1 = [57]
Daniel Craig [3] - 1 = [2]
Eliminated
3rd - Timothy Dalton
4th - George Lazenby
5th - Pierce Brosnan
6th - Roger Moore
"And if I told you that I'm from the Ministry of Defence?" James Bond - The Property of a Lady
LoeffelholzThe United States, With LovePosts: 8,998Quartermasters
Sean Connery [57]
Daniel Craig [2] + 1 = [3]
Eliminated
3rd - Timothy Dalton
4th - George Lazenby
5th - Pierce Brosnan
6th - Roger Moore
Check out my Amazon author page!Mark Loeffelholz
"I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
"Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
Sean Connery [55] +1 = [56]
Daniel Craig [4] - 1 = [3]
Eliminated
3rd - Timothy Dalton
4th - George Lazenby
5th - Pierce Brosnan
6th - Roger Moore
Sorry - you can only vote once a day in this thread....
So the scores are:
Sean Connery [56] -1 = [55]
Daniel Craig [3] + 1 = [4]
Eliminated
3rd - Timothy Dalton
4th - George Lazenby
5th - Pierce Brosnan
6th - Roger Moore
Yes, I know. That's why I voted on May 27th and then on May 28th according to the time clock. As I look right now the last two times I voted were on separate days.
Where did you get the idea I voted twice in one day?
Not that it matters, the game is over, I am just a little confused.
Great little game (although not as short as we all suspected ) )
Was fun while it lasted {[]
Here's my thoughts on the rankings:
1st - Sean Connery - As Barbel said, "But of course" -{
2nd - Daniel Craig - Quite happy that he finished 2nd as he was a good Bond. I would have personally had him finish 3rd though, after Moore
3rd - Timothy Dalton - Would have had him finish 4th, so fairly happy with his placing. A decent bond
4th - George Lazenby - He only did one film and IMO didn't really have much of a chance to develop his persona as 007. So I would have had him finish last
5th - Pierce Brosnan - Good bond, but yeah, I agree with this placing
6th - Roger Moore - Blasphemy! Although I'm not surpirsed - I know Moore isn't everyone's cup of tea. I would have personally had him finish 2nd place
Great little game (although not as short as we all suspected ) )
Indeed! B-) I'm proud of (Formerly) Poor Danny'sTM last stand... :007)
Check out my Amazon author page!Mark Loeffelholz
"I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
"Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
Sir MilesThe Wrong Side Of The WardrobePosts: 27,757Chief of Staff
Yes, I know. That's why I voted on May 27th and then on May 28th according to the time clock. As I look right now the last two times I voted were on separate days.
Where did you get the idea I voted twice in one day?
Not that it matters, the game is over, I am just a little confused.
Hi - you voted yesterday at 02:02 and again at 22:09 - so I'm not sure how they come to be in two different days ?:) I hope that clears up your confusion -{
Yes, I know. That's why I voted on May 27th and then on May 28th according to the time clock. As I look right now the last two times I voted were on separate days.
Where did you get the idea I voted twice in one day?
Not that it matters, the game is over, I am just a little confused.
Hi - you voted yesterday at 02:02 and again at 22:09 - so I'm not sure how they come to be in two different days ?:) I hope that clears up your confusion -{
It comes to be two different days because one says "May 27th at 18:02" and the other reads "Yesterday 14:09". Making it May 27th and May 28th. On most Gregorian calendars that makes two different days. Of course, I can't see what you see as admin., but according to the interface I have on the site I voted once on May 27th (at 18:02) and then again 20 hours later at 14:09 on May 28th. TWO DIFFERENT DAYS. Unless of course you are talking about another day entirely, or a lunar calendar .
I want to figure this out because I regularly take part in these games and if something is wrong with the site clock on the page I am looking at then it would be good to know for future fowl ups.
I want to figure this out because I regularly take part in these games and if something is wrong with the site clock on the page I am looking at then it would be good to know for future fowl ups.
I quite agree....I think your problem lies with the fact that you haven't adjusted the site clock to make it the correct time...(this would be something that would be automatically done, but as Si is an absent landlord at present, it comes down to each of us to this for ourselves)....go to 'My Profile' across the top, and then select 'my settings'...you can alter the clock timing there....
As for your three posts in one day....I could undestand a time difference of one hour...but your first post is over two hours into a new day....I know you are not UK based....so the problem obviously lies with that...perhaps you could relocate ? )
I want to figure this out because I regularly take part in these games and if something is wrong with the site clock on the page I am looking at then it would be good to know for future fowl ups.
I quite agree....I think your problem lies with the fact that you haven't adjusted the site clock to make it the correct time...(this would be something that would be automatically done, but as Si is an absent landlord at present, it comes down to each of us to this for ourselves)....go to 'My Profile' across the top, and then select 'my settings'...you can alter the clock timing there....
As for your three posts in one day....I could undestand a time difference of one hour...but your first post is over two hours into a new day....I know you are not UK based....so the problem obviously lies with that...perhaps you could relocate ? )
I hope that has cleared it all up -{
Yeah, that does clear it up. Big time. The last time I was on AJB (about a year ago) the site clock and my clock were synced. That must've changed with the new format.
Sorry about the confusion from my end as well. I will make the changes, thank you for working through that with me. I just went and read Loeff's post as well on the introduction, and saw he made the suggestion to switch to GMT. Apparently, although not "mandatory" it was "mandatory."
I just love any excuse for puns, the worse the better. I did think on making a few fowl jokes along the lines of Sean Canary or Roger Moorhen, but managed to resist the temptation... just.
Sir MilesThe Wrong Side Of The WardrobePosts: 27,757Chief of Staff
Yeah, that does clear it up. Big time. The last time I was on AJB (about a year ago) the site clock and my clock were synced. That must've changed with the new format.
Sorry about the confusion from my end as well. I will make the changes, thank you for working through that with me. I just went and read Loeff's post as well on the introduction, and saw he made the suggestion to switch to GMT. Apparently, although not "mandatory" it was "mandatory."
Comments
Daniel Craig [2] + 1 = 3
Eliminated
3rd - Timothy Dalton
4th - George Lazenby
5th - Pierce Brosnan
6th - Roger Moore
Daniel Craig [3] + 1 = [4]
Eliminated
3rd - Timothy Dalton
4th - George Lazenby
5th - Pierce Brosnan
6th - Roger Moore
Daniel Craig [4] - 1 = [3]
Eliminated
3rd - Timothy Dalton
4th - George Lazenby
5th - Pierce Brosnan
6th - Roger Moore
Sorry - you can only vote once a day in this thread....
So the scores are:
Sean Connery [56] -1 = [55]
Daniel Craig [3] + 1 = [4]
Eliminated
3rd - Timothy Dalton
4th - George Lazenby
5th - Pierce Brosnan
6th - Roger Moore
Daniel Craig [4] - 1 = [3]
Eliminated
3rd - Timothy Dalton
4th - George Lazenby
5th - Pierce Brosnan
6th - Roger Moore
Daniel Craig [3] - 1 = [2]
Eliminated
3rd - Timothy Dalton
4th - George Lazenby
5th - Pierce Brosnan
6th - Roger Moore
Daniel Craig [2] + 1 = [3]
Eliminated
3rd - Timothy Dalton
4th - George Lazenby
5th - Pierce Brosnan
6th - Roger Moore
"I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
"Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
Sean Connery [56] + 1 = [57]
Daniel Craig [3] - 1 = [2]
Eliminated
3rd - Timothy Dalton
4th - George Lazenby
5th - Pierce Brosnan
6th - Roger Moore
Daniel Craig [2] -1= [1]
Eliminated
3rd - Timothy Dalton
4th - George Lazenby
5th - Pierce Brosnan
6th - Roger Moore
1 - Moore, 2 - Dalton, 3 - Craig, 4 - Connery, 5 - Brosnan, 6 - Lazenby
Daniel Craig [1] - 1 = [0]
1st - Sean Connery -{
Eliminated
2nd - Daniel Craig
3rd - Timothy Dalton
4th - George Lazenby
5th - Pierce Brosnan
6th - Roger Moore
-{ "But of course!" :007)
Good game -{
Yes, I know. That's why I voted on May 27th and then on May 28th according to the time clock. As I look right now the last two times I voted were on separate days.
Where did you get the idea I voted twice in one day?
Not that it matters, the game is over, I am just a little confused.
Was fun while it lasted {[]
Here's my thoughts on the rankings:
1st - Sean Connery - As Barbel said, "But of course" -{
2nd - Daniel Craig - Quite happy that he finished 2nd as he was a good Bond. I would have personally had him finish 3rd though, after Moore
3rd - Timothy Dalton - Would have had him finish 4th, so fairly happy with his placing. A decent bond
4th - George Lazenby - He only did one film and IMO didn't really have much of a chance to develop his persona as 007. So I would have had him finish last
5th - Pierce Brosnan - Good bond, but yeah, I agree with this placing
6th - Roger Moore - Blasphemy! Although I'm not surpirsed - I know Moore isn't everyone's cup of tea. I would have personally had him finish 2nd place
1 - Moore, 2 - Dalton, 3 - Craig, 4 - Connery, 5 - Brosnan, 6 - Lazenby
Indeed! B-) I'm proud of (Formerly) Poor Danny'sTM last stand... :007)
"I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
"Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
Hi - you voted yesterday at 02:02 and again at 22:09 - so I'm not sure how they come to be in two different days ?:) I hope that clears up your confusion -{
It comes to be two different days because one says "May 27th at 18:02" and the other reads "Yesterday 14:09". Making it May 27th and May 28th. On most Gregorian calendars that makes two different days.
I want to figure this out because I regularly take part in these games and if something is wrong with the site clock on the page I am looking at then it would be good to know for future fowl ups.
It'd be a turkey if we had lots of those. Well, we could duck out of it. Unless we were chicken. ;%
I quite agree....I think your problem lies with the fact that you haven't adjusted the site clock to make it the correct time...(this would be something that would be automatically done, but as Si is an absent landlord at present, it comes down to each of us to this for ourselves)....go to 'My Profile' across the top, and then select 'my settings'...you can alter the clock timing there....
As for your three posts in one day....I could undestand a time difference of one hour...but your first post is over two hours into a new day....I know you are not UK based....so the problem obviously lies with that...perhaps you could relocate ?
I hope that has cleared it all up -{
Yeah, that does clear it up. Big time. The last time I was on AJB (about a year ago) the site clock and my clock were synced. That must've changed with the new format.
Sorry about the confusion from my end as well. I will make the changes, thank you for working through that with me. I just went and read Loeff's post as well on the introduction, and saw he made the suggestion to switch to GMT. Apparently, although not "mandatory" it was "mandatory."
You know what's really funny? That's not the first time I've "turkeyed" up the word foul on this site.
Embarassing.
I just love any excuse for puns, the worse the better. I did think on making a few fowl jokes along the lines of Sean Canary or Roger Moorhen, but managed to resist the temptation... just.
I'm just glad it's all cleared up now
Thanks for understanding -{