NSNA Should Replace Thunderball

TheScashManTheScashMan Posts: 111MI6 Agent
Eon should strike a deal with Orion and swap Thunderball with Never Say Never Again. That way, this far superior outing gets it's rightful place in the franchise.

Whilst NSNA is not the best of Connery's portrayals as Bond, it is certainly much better than Thunderball.

A comparison:

* The opening scene at the health club:

Thunderball: This is probably the best scene in the entire film, but unfortunately doesn't get any better. Yes, there are some entertaining moments with Bond seducing one of the workers, and when he locks that villian in the pod, but it fails in a really good duel. 6/10.

NSNA: The opening here is much more exciting, and we get an excellent fight scene that starts at the gym and sprawls through the health club itself. The henchman is dominating, and the fight does Connery credit. Connery generally does good fight scenes, and his age does not slow him down here. I only wish that this scene lasted longer, as it was a little on the short side. 8/10

* The sharks

Thunderball: The sharks never really interacted with Bond, making them a waste. Their prescence makes some impact, but, alas, they just weren't utilised effectively. 4/10

NSNA: We get a great scene dedicated to Bond vs a shark, and it's pretty exciting. 7/10

* Entertainment factor

Thunderball: This film dragged on, and on.... and on. Too much underwater shots and little action for much of the film. The end scenes with Connery fighting underwater and then on the boat were somewhat enjoyable, but had moments of stupidity via the sped-up scenes, that spoiled it somewhat. 4/10

NSNA: From the motorbike chase to Connery throwing Rowan Atkinson in the swimming pool at the end, NSNA was a fun romp throughout. 6/10.

*Overall ratings:

Thunderball 4/10

NSNA 6.5/10

Summary: Eon should strike a deal with Orion to replace Thunderball with NSNA, and make NSNA the official entry in the franchise (until such a time when hopefully all films are re-made so that Sir Rog can take his leading role once more -{ )

Comments

  • AlexAlex The Eastern SeaboardPosts: 2,694MI6 Agent
    I used to group the two on the shelf. Then one day, I noticed the NSNA dvd lying in the laundry hamper. Apparently, the eye candy visuals of the swingin' 1960s in technicolor had simply been too much for the poor fella to handle anymore. Close proximity to a Tom Jones ending might've also caused the phenomenon.

    But in the end I concluded that it was simply the Domino/Fiona affect. Powerful contents.
  • Napoleon PluralNapoleon Plural LondonPosts: 10,467MI6 Agent
    The main improvement of NSNA is the jazzy, fun score in contrast to Thunderball's heavy, lugubrious soundtrack. I don't know what John Barry was thinking.

    BTW, here's the motorbike clip dubbed with David Arnold's score.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cyp3PEcLO0
    "This is where we leave you Mr Bond."

    Roger Moore 1927-2017
  • TheScashManTheScashMan Posts: 111MI6 Agent
    A good clip indeed!

    I think Thunderball was a pitiful excuse for a Bond film, as detailed in my OP, and I am certain had Fleming been alive to witness it he would have been disgusted!
  • John DrakeJohn Drake On assignmentPosts: 2,564MI6 Agent
    TB is the best of the Connery Bonds IMO. The best things about NSNA are Brandeur, Kim Basinger and Laura Gemser lookalike Barbara Carrera. As for Fleming being disgusted, I doubt it. The old chap was pretty much shock proof.
  • Sir Hillary BraySir Hillary Bray College of ArmsPosts: 2,174MI6 Agent
    Anyone ever seen TheScashMan and Napoleon Plural together?

    Thought not. :))
    Hilly...you old devil!
  • youknowmynameyouknowmyname Gainesville, FL, USAPosts: 703MI6 Agent
    Eon should strike a deal with Orion and swap Thunderball with Never Say Never Again. That way, this far superior outing gets it's rightful place in the franchise.

    Whilst NSNA is not the best of Connery's portrayals as Bond, it is certainly much better than Thunderball.

    A comparison:

    * The opening scene at the health club:

    Thunderball: This is probably the best scene in the entire film, but unfortunately doesn't get any better. Yes, there are some entertaining moments with Bond seducing one of the workers, and when he locks that villian in the pod, but it fails in a really good duel. 6/10.

    NSNA: The opening here is much more exciting, and we get an excellent fight scene that starts at the gym and sprawls through the health club itself. The henchman is dominating, and the fight does Connery credit. Connery generally does good fight scenes, and his age does not slow him down here. I only wish that this scene lasted longer, as it was a little on the short side. 8/10

    * The sharks

    Thunderball: The sharks never really interacted with Bond, making them a waste. Their prescence makes some impact, but, alas, they just weren't utilised effectively. 4/10

    NSNA: We get a great scene dedicated to Bond vs a shark, and it's pretty exciting. 7/10

    * Entertainment factor

    Thunderball: This film dragged on, and on.... and on. Too much underwater shots and little action for much of the film. The end scenes with Connery fighting underwater and then on the boat were somewhat enjoyable, but had moments of stupidity via the sped-up scenes, that spoiled it somewhat. 4/10

    NSNA: From the motorbike chase to Connery throwing Rowan Atkinson in the swimming pool at the end, NSNA was a fun romp throughout. 6/10.

    *Overall ratings:

    Thunderball 4/10

    NSNA 6.5/10

    Summary: Eon should strike a deal with Orion to replace Thunderball with NSNA, and make NSNA the official entry in the franchise (until such a time when hopefully all films are re-made so that Sir Rog can take his leading role once more -{ )

    To be honest, this post surprises me. I mean, if you are such a Moore fan why would you hail NSNA, the film that was released to complete with 1983's Octopussy, which I believe you hailed as one of his best in another thread.
    "We have all the time in the world..."
  • TheScashManTheScashMan Posts: 111MI6 Agent
    To be honest, this post surprises me. I mean, if you are such a Moore fan why would you hail NSNA, the film that was released to complete with 1983's Octopussy, which I believe you hailed as one of his best in another thread.

    Actually, NSNA is no where near as good as Octopussy, so there is no competition. Any film that pits Sir Rog against another leading actor is always going to lose out (in favour of Moore).

    And NSNA deserves credit in it's own right for being a better interpretation of the novel than the original Thunderball. However, if/when Moore ever reprises the role, HIS version will be the best. No doubt about that.
  • youknowmynameyouknowmyname Gainesville, FL, USAPosts: 703MI6 Agent
    To be honest, this post surprises me. I mean, if you are such a Moore fan why would you hail NSNA, the film that was released to complete with 1983's Octopussy, which I believe you hailed as one of his best in another thread.

    Actually, NSNA is no where near as good as Octopussy, so there is no competition. Any film that pits Sir Rog against another leading actor is always going to lose out (in favour of Moore).

    And NSNA deserves credit in it's own right for being a better interpretation of the novel than the original Thunderball. However, if/when Moore ever reprises the role, HIS version will be the best. No doubt about that.

    Scash, have you talked to Moore about all the work you are planning for him. I mean he may look like he is in his 40s but he damn well isn't. Do you think he's up for several more Bond outings?
    "We have all the time in the world..."
  • ghost1ghost1 Posts: 82MI6 Agent
    Now quickly choose one. Sean Connery at his prime of bondhood vs a Connery that is nearly 20 more years seasoned. If you ask yourself that you should take the prime Connery. I know this isn't a good way to judge two "different " movies but it sells itself doesn't it.
  • JADE66JADE66 Posts: 238MI6 Agent
    NSNA can never replace Thunderball and I will tell you why.
    I remember very clearly waiting in line at the cinema to purchase my ticket for NSNA. I was tired of Roger Moore's character assassination of my hero and I was ready for the return of the "real" Bond. Imagine my disappointment when I discovered that Never Say Never Again was just a poor remake of a fine film.
    What makes NSNA so weak?
    For starters, the characterizations. With the exception of Max von Sydow's Blofeld, Connery's Bond is significantly older than every other character in the film. Instead of a Sean Connery in his prime we have an aging, tired, "deactivated" 007 at odds with his too young, snobbish, pompous boss, M. Edward Fox's portrayal is that of a stodgy bureaucrat, more interested in keeping his upper lip appropriately stiff than in solving a deadly crisis. Bernard Lee's M from Thunderball captures Fleming's iron-haired clear eyed admiral perfectly. Lee's M supports Bond instead of scolding him and tutting around the office like an old hen.
    Klaus Maria Brandauer's boyish Max Largo isn't in the least menacing. He looks as though Kim Basinger could have kicked his butt at any moment. He is way too small opposite Connery's 6' 4" frame and never seems to posess any real threat potential. Adolpho Celli's much larger Emilio Largo with his eye patch and casual cruelty is a much more threatening character.
    Barbara Carerra's Fatima Blush is certainly deadly but the psychotic glee she takes in her murders makes her seem laughably crazy. Luciana Paluzzi's Fiona Volpe is far deadlier with her icy control and smoldering beauty.
    Kim Basinger's "dumb blonde" is not nearly as appealing as Claudine Auger's vulnerable Domino.
    Story handling. Lorenzo Semple Jr.'s screenplay is so full of holes that he loses touch with his characters completely. Instead of presenting us with truly deadly villains we are given a Largo/Fatima who behave more like psychotic children than professional criminals. And whenever Semple writes himself into a corner his only way out is to give Bond a gadget.
    Bond is trapped near the docks, put rockets on his motor cycle. When Fatima has him cornered and seemingly disarmed, have Bond shoot her with his fountain pen. When Bond can't reach some inaccessible spot that the villains have reached, give 007 a weird, rocket powered personal transport that looks like it was stolen from a Dick Tracy comic.
    Although Thunderball contains its share of gadgets they never replace Bond's brain. The pre-title sequence jet pack, the motor driven underwater back pack and the Aston Martin's water cannons are punctuation marks on the scenes they are featured in, not convenient plot hole fillers.
    NSNA ends with one of the lamest scenes in Bond history. Instead of the classic final threat that Bond has to dispose of we are treated to Bond dunking the bumbling Nigel into the swimming pool. In Thunderball we get a breathtaking airlift that, when I first saw it looked like the coolest thing ever put on film. (Granted, that was a long time ago.)
    Finally, Thunderball has attained a classic status that NSNA will never have. TB is one of the gilt-edged Bonds. While it is certainly not the best film in the series, it is far better written and performed than the remake. Plus TB has more of a Fleming "flavor" than the other film. This opinion is of course completely subjective but for me TB has a far better "feel" to it than the limp wristed overly comical NSNA with its hamfisted writing and direction.
    On my Bond menu, Thunderball is a Filet Mignon, NSNA is hamburger helper.
    And please for the love of God and man, don't bring back Roger Moore.
    ;)
  • fire and icefire and ice EarthPosts: 149MI6 Agent
    tb is batman begins, nsna is batman and robin lol
    '...exceptionally fine shot...'
  • Mister GreeneMister Greene Posts: 224MI6 Agent
    While I enjoyed NSNA I still have to side with TB. the effects in NSNA are not htat great and while it was good to see SC in the role again I think they could have done some better writing to push the story along.

    and I think we are missing the best part of TB and that is Claudine Auger much much better than Kim Bassinger.
  • John DrakeJohn Drake On assignmentPosts: 2,564MI6 Agent
    I watched TB again recently and while the film was not quite as gripping as I remember it, the scenes between Bond and Domino were really good. There's a tenderness to them which is missing from any of the other relationships between Connery and his Bond girls. I do like Basinger in NSNA as well though.
  • icsics Posts: 1,413MI6 Agent
    No no comparison – NSNA is so low compare to TB
  • Sir_Miles_MesservySir_Miles_Messervy MI6 CLASSIFIEDPosts: 113MI6 Agent
    Regardless of the better movie, this entire premise is unrealistic. You cannot simply "replace" TB with NSNA. Both of these movies have their legacies and their place in time. To suggest they can just be swapped out is complete nonsense, really.

    A much better argument would be to suggest that NSNA should be added to the canon. I disagree with this contention, but it would be the proper one to make.
  • ClarkeyClarkey FrancePosts: 32MI6 Agent
    Eon should strike a deal with Orion and swap Thunderball with Never Say Never Again. That way, this far superior outing gets it's rightful place in the franchise.

    Whilst NSNA is not the best of Connery's portrayals as Bond, it is certainly much better than Thunderball.

    A comparison:

    * The opening scene at the health club:

    Thunderball: This is probably the best scene in the entire film, but unfortunately doesn't get any better. Yes, there are some entertaining moments with Bond seducing one of the workers, and when he locks that villian in the pod, but it fails in a really good duel. 6/10.

    NSNA: The opening here is much more exciting, and we get an excellent fight scene that starts at the gym and sprawls through the health club itself. The henchman is dominating, and the fight does Connery credit. Connery generally does good fight scenes, and his age does not slow him down here. I only wish that this scene lasted longer, as it was a little on the short side. 8/10

    * The sharks

    Thunderball: The sharks never really interacted with Bond, making them a waste. Their prescence makes some impact, but, alas, they just weren't utilised effectively. 4/10

    NSNA: We get a great scene dedicated to Bond vs a shark, and it's pretty exciting. 7/10

    * Entertainment factor

    Thunderball: This film dragged on, and on.... and on. Too much underwater shots and little action for much of the film. The end scenes with Connery fighting underwater and then on the boat were somewhat enjoyable, but had moments of stupidity via the sped-up scenes, that spoiled it somewhat. 4/10

    NSNA: From the motorbike chase to Connery throwing Rowan Atkinson in the swimming pool at the end, NSNA was a fun romp throughout. 6/10.

    *Overall ratings:

    Thunderball 4/10

    NSNA 6.5/10

    Summary: Eon should strike a deal with Orion to replace Thunderball with NSNA, and make NSNA the official entry in the franchise (until such a time when hopefully all films are re-made so that Sir Rog can take his leading role once more -{ )

    Absolutely ! I'm agree with your analysis. I said the same since a long time but the French forums don't want understand.
  • Mr. Arlington BeechMr. Arlington Beech Posts: 105MI6 Agent
    wait...Roger Moore is your favorite Bond? Seriously?
  • Wint and Kidd far-outWint and Kidd far-out AustraliaPosts: 109MI6 Agent
    Regardless of the better movie, this entire premise is unrealistic. You cannot simply "replace" TB with NSNA. Both of these movies have their legacies and their place in time. To suggest they can just be swapped out is complete nonsense, really.

    A much better argument would be to suggest that NSNA should be added to the canon. I disagree with this contention, but it would be the proper one to make.

    I agree completely. Especially in regard to the way NSNA ends. I have to admit the ending seemed totally foreign to the way Bond would normally act according to his character. At the end of each movie Bond carries on his love affair with his current ladyfriend until he eventually has had enough and says good-bye to her (offscreen) all ready for the next one he meets. Except of course OHMSS, where he genuinely fell in love, married and would have settled down had she not been murdered on their honeymoon.

    But in NSNA he seems determined to spend the rest of his life in a de-facto implied relationship with Domino and vows to give up being 007 despite M's pleadings through Nigel. I can't imagine this portrayal of Bond ever being talked into coming back for YOLT.

    NSNA is okay as a stand alone remake of Thunderball, and possibly Fleming may have liked it better, but it can never replace it.
    Roger Moore is my favourite 007 R.I.P.
  • RJJBRJJB United StatesPosts: 346MI6 Agent
    One film "replacing" another is just moronic, not quite as stupid as suggesting Roger Moore should return to the role.
  • The Domino EffectThe Domino Effect Posts: 3,638MI6 Agent
    For better or worse, I wouldn't mind betting that there's a fair bit of sentimental attachment to Thunderball that NSNA simply doesn't have. TB may not be regarded amongst the best of the early Bonds, but it still resonates with that magical era known as the 1960s when men were men and velour was popular...and women would dismiss terrible sexual harrassment with a 'harrumph,' a "MISTER Bond" and a straightening of the hair. Even if you weren't alive in the 1960s, there's a reasonable chance that TB was the first Bond film you saw because it shows up on TV quite regularly, unlike NSNA.

    I don't dislike NSNA at all and would never argue that it isn't a better film than TB but for me, TB will always be a million miles ahead in my own popularity ratings for so many reasons including its links with my childhood, the starring role for the Avro Vulcan (an aircraft my Dad spent 12 years on and whose beauty and magnificence he instilled in me), Palmyra, Domino, Fiona Volpe, Adolfo Celi, the DB5 and the jetpack. I like NSNA a lot, but the one overriding highlight of it for me is Nigel Small-Fawcett.

    Now, if you could include his nasally plummy "Mister Bond"s into Thunderball, you'd have the perfect Bond!
  • little nellylittle nelly London, EnglandPosts: 152MI6 Agent
    TB is POTA 1967... NSNA is POTA 2001. Nuff said. Except Mr Bean wasn't in the Burton effort. Might've improved it if he had been, mind. Marky who?!?!?
    N O I N F O R M A T I O N I S U S E L E S S
Sign In or Register to comment.