AVTAK im on to a hidding now.

OK

ive just watched AVTAK, on the sunday afternoon re-runs in the Uk. And i really enjoyed it.

Ok Moore is way too old, the plot is ripped off Goldfinger etc etc, but there is alot of positives in this film:

Christopher Walken is excellent, The scenes with Patrick Macnee and Roger Moore are wonderfull. The steeple chase scene is great. When Zorin murders Howe in cold blood is as chilling as any Bond moment. The climax on The GGB is top.
Ok this film is **** compared to Goldfinger, TSWLM, et al. But i dont think it's as terrible as it's often made out???
«1

Comments

  • LOO7K OUTLOO7K OUT United KingdomPosts: 474MI6 Agent
    I'm very fond of a View to a Kill. Ok, yes Roger Moore is getting on, but he's far from decrepid here. It's a very good action thriller.

    I count myself lucky, as I enjoy every single Bond film. I think they all have much to enjoy. My favourite by a long way is Thunderball though, almost an obsession!
  • Mr MartiniMr Martini That nice house in the sky.Posts: 2,707MI6 Agent
    I enjoyed AVTAK also. I'm biased though, most of the SF scenes were filmed less than 20 miles away from me.
    Some people would complain even if you hang them with a new rope
  • I liked AVTAK. Sure it was a rip-off of "Goldfinger", had some unnecessary scenes (Zorin with a Mini-Uzi) and Roger Moore had officially hung on too long, but it had Christopher Walken, an awesome John Barry score, some of those hallmark beautiful long-shots of San Francisco and Paris and a final showdown at maybe of the most iconic locations used in the series yet.
    That's a Smith and Wesson, and you've had your six.
  • Napoleon PluralNapoleon Plural LondonPosts: 10,467MI6 Agent
    To be honest, I thought Moore looked more leathery in his previous two films, I particularly wasn't sure about his ducks a~~~ hairstyle, you know sort of thick up the sides.
    "This is where we leave you Mr Bond."

    Roger Moore 1927-2017
  • goldengun99goldengun99 Posts: 9MI6 Agent
    Zorin with a mini-Uzi was raising the bar on violence in a Bond movie - but remember that Zorin is a biological freak. It's in line with his character as a genetically altered psycho.

    I like the Technological theme of the movie, Grace Jones is a wonderful villianess, the scenes at the French palace (i.e. the horse race) were wonderfully shot - some excellent stunt work that stays in line with the other Bond movies. No CGI crap here. Stunt men were made to be broken B-).

    Who can resist Tanya Roberts - she's very easy on the eyes in this film.

    And Chris Walken is terrific - I always love his facial expression while he interviews Bond in his office. When Zorin's face lights up when his PC screen reads "LICENSE TO KILL".

    Barry's score is dynamite, Duran Duran's #1 Bond song "A View To A Kill" is a favorite of mine. Their song and accompanying video really appealed to young people ain the mid-80's.

    AVTAK receives a bad rap cause RM was 55 at the time, but its miles better than the 2 Dalton movies, TWINE, TND and DAF. I think DAF and LTK are the worse Bond movies ever - I hate watching them. Connery's on auto-pilot for DAF and he looks really old in that movie. And LTK put me to sleep.
  • I think I might stick AVTAK on right now actually, hah.

    One niggling point about this movie though is the presence of "California Girls" in the PTS snowboard chase. It's like a musical version of the big lipped aligator moment for me, and isn't needed when you already have one of the absolute best John Barry scores in this movie already. I know it's a small thing, but it does annoy me. I think moments like that hold the Moore films back.
    That's a Smith and Wesson, and you've had your six.
  • Also, the scene in M's office: why doesn't the Defence Minister know what EMP is? Wouldn't the man in charge of Britian's defence have at least a basic knowledge of an EMP fallout? Or was that still a new thing in the early 80s (and even if it is, wouldn't he be among the first to know?)?
    That's a Smith and Wesson, and you've had your six.
  • Ricardo C.Ricardo C. Posts: 916MI6 Agent
    Also, the scene in M's office: why doesn't the Defence Minister know what EMP is? Wouldn't the man in charge of Britian's defence have at least a basic knowledge of an EMP fallout? Or was that still a new thing in the early 80s (and even if it is, wouldn't he be among the first to know?)?

    The Defense Minister has always been a retard. Like in For Your Eyes Only anyone with a brain cell could realize identifying Locque would have made the cold trail hot again.
    I think I might stick AVTAK on right now actually, hah.

    One niggling point about this movie though is the presence of "California Girls" in the PTS snowboard chase. It's like a musical version of the big lipped aligator moment for me, and isn't needed when you already have one of the absolute best John Barry scores in this movie already. I know it's a small thing, but it does annoy me. I think moments like that hold the Moore films back.


    Two other things: It was snow boarding scene and that wasn't even the beach boys, it was a tribute band.
  • Ricardo C. wrote:
    Two other things: It was snow boarding scene and that wasn't even the beach boys, it was a tribute band.
    I'm a young man, it's not the kinda thing I'd be expected to know anyway ;)
    That's a Smith and Wesson, and you've had your six.
  • mrbain007mrbain007 Posts: 393MI6 Agent
    edited September 2010
    I always had a soft spot for A View to a Kill. Maybe it was because it was made the year of my birth :) Don't get me wrong its a far from great film however its still enjoyable for several reasons:
    -Roger Moore (despite admittedly being too old) was charming as ever
    -AVTAK had some of John Barry's best music (loved the "Dinner with Stacey" theme - so peaceful)
    -Christopher Walken made an excellent villain - a real psychotic
    -There were some brilliantly filmed action set pieces (such as the steeple chase, the elavator rescue and the Golden Gate Bridge fight) which made up for some dodgy ones ("California Girl" PTS, police chase)

    A lot of people sneer at Moore's Bond films now, which is a shame. In my opinion LALD, TSWLM, MR, FYEO, OP and AVTAK were all far more entertaining (and far more re-watchable) than QoS (which I like less the more I think about it X-( ). Yes they were silly but they were also fun, had character, had better villains and knew what type of films they wanted to be; even if they - for the most part - weren't like the Ian Fleming novels (I draw the line at MWTGG though, despite Christopher Lee's presence).
  • mrbain007mrbain007 Posts: 393MI6 Agent
    AVTAK receives a bad rap cause RM was 55 at the time

    He was actually 58 :s
  • Ricardo C.Ricardo C. Posts: 916MI6 Agent
    edited September 2010
    mrbain007 wrote:
    -AVTAK had some of John Barry's best music (loved the "Dinner with Stacey" theme - so peaceful)

    That's the only thing I really like about AVTAK.

    Also I normally love Christopher Walken but he's only good when he is aloud to be un-restrained. Here Walken is this bland character with a bland motivation.
  • Ricardo C.Ricardo C. Posts: 916MI6 Agent
    Ricardo C. wrote:
    Two other things: It was snow boarding scene and that wasn't even the beach boys, it was a tribute band.
    I'm a young man, it's not the kinda thing I'd be expected to know anyway ;)


    I am only 23 but I have a old soul. ;)
  • mrbain007mrbain007 Posts: 393MI6 Agent
    Ricardo C. wrote:
    mrbain007 wrote:
    -AVTAK had some of John Barry's best music (loved the "Dinner with Stacey" theme - so peaceful)

    That's the only thing I really like about AVTAK.

    Also I normally love Christopher Walken but he's only good when he is aloud to be un-restrained. Here Walken is this bland character with a bland motivation.

    As opposed to Dominic Greene?
  • You know the scene where Bond is carrying Stacy down the ladder after the City Hall fire? What's the music for that scene called, and is it on the official soundtrack (I can't find it on YouTube)?
    That's a Smith and Wesson, and you've had your six.
  • Ricardo C.Ricardo C. Posts: 916MI6 Agent
    edited September 2010
    mrbain007 wrote:
    Ricardo C. wrote:
    mrbain007 wrote:
    -AVTAK had some of John Barry's best music (loved the "Dinner with Stacey" theme - so peaceful)

    That's the only thing I really like about AVTAK.

    Also I normally love Christopher Walken but he's only good when he is aloud to be un-restrained. Here Walken is this bland character with a bland motivation.

    As opposed to Dominic Greene?


    He was even worse. Even Georgi Koskov was more interesting than Greene.

    Okay I'll amend that statement. Zorin was a fun character but he still had a bland motivation.
  • I thought that Walken's more subtle Zorin was a better portrayal of his psychopathy than the over-the-top, almost comic villainy that the series has thrown up from time to time. He is certainly superficially charming and a lot of his goons seem to like the guy, even convincing May Day he loves her. That all hides the fact he has no empathy, sense of guilt or interest in anything other than his own goals.

    If you ask me, Walken's comparitivley more realistic performance of Zorin's psychopathy makes him a far more interesting villain than he would be if, say, David Bowie had gotten the role. It's not a case of "Christopher Walken plays Christopher Walken" either, which can happen with distinctive individuals like himself.
    That's a Smith and Wesson, and you've had your six.
  • Ricardo C.Ricardo C. Posts: 916MI6 Agent
    edited September 2010
    I thought that Walken's more subtle Zorin was a better portrayal of his psychopathy than the over-the-top, almost comic villainy that the series has thrown up from time to time. He is certainly superficially charming and a lot of his goons seem to like the guy, even convincing May Day he loves her. That all hides the fact he has no empathy, sense of guilt or interest in anything other than his own goals.

    If you ask me, Walken's comparitivley more realistic performance of Zorin's psychopathy makes him a far more interesting villain than he would be if, say, David Bowie had gotten the role. It's not a case of "Christopher Walken plays Christopher Walken" either, which can happen with distinctive individuals like himself.

    I thought Walken's plot to destroy Sillicon Valley was rather cartoony though it's not as fantastic as the antics of Stromberg and Drax.

    Walken I think did a great job with a role muddled with lack of an interesting motivation or a clever scheme.
  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy Behind you !Posts: 63,792MI6 Agent
    I always quite enjoyed AVTAK,untill joining this forum and found it's one of the lease liked of the series.Apart from the usual cring worthy bits (california girls) But then again many of the Bonds have their moments you'd wish your cinema seat would swallow you up,( they probably seemed funny at the script meeting), Would I be happy after my christmas dinner to come in to watch AVTAK, sure I would. :)
    "I've been informed that there ARE a couple of QAnon supporters who are fairly regular posters in AJB."
  • mrbain007mrbain007 Posts: 393MI6 Agent
    Would I be happy after my christmas dinner to come in to watch AVTAK, sure I would. :)

    I second that :)
  • BarbelBarbel ScotlandPosts: 37,865Chief of Staff
    You know the scene where Bond is carrying Stacy down the ladder after the City Hall fire? What's the music for that scene called, and is it on the official soundtrack (I can't find it on YouTube)?

    It's called "Fanfare", and it sadly isn't on the official soundtrack. A faithful cover version can be found on various Silva Screen albums such as "Bond Back In Action 2" and "The Ultimate James Bond Film Music Collection". This was conducted by Nic Raine, who was the orchestrator on the original.
  • DaltonFan1DaltonFan1 The West of IrelandPosts: 503MI6 Agent
    A lot of people seem to have a soft spot for AVTAK.
    I personally don't see why it is criticised so much. Moore was far too old but this was also the case in FYEO and OP and they seem to escape such criticism. And it also enjoys brilliant performances from Walken and Patrick Macnee, as well as the beautiful city of San Francisco.
    “Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to a better understanding of ourselves.” - Carl Jung
  • Napoleon PluralNapoleon Plural LondonPosts: 10,467MI6 Agent
    Have to say, Moore's first bit of dialogue in the iceberg is awfully mannered, he's a stereotype of himself. But other stuff is great and to me he looks younger and less leathery than before. The shot of the helicopter bearing down on his snow buggy like a giant wasp is great, the pts is full of wonderful kinetic energy.
    "This is where we leave you Mr Bond."

    Roger Moore 1927-2017
  • LOO7K OUTLOO7K OUT United KingdomPosts: 474MI6 Agent
    Spot on NP - Roger Moore looks really good for the most part of this movie, there were rumours at the time that he had had his eyes done, which he denied. But he looks fresher, not to mention a lot fitter and slimmer in AVTAK than he had for the last couple of movies.

    I think the view that the Roger Moore era turned into parody by the end was a bit of a myth. The only one that went a bit far was Moonraker, but I still enjoy it. John Glen did a lot of good when he became the Director for the 80's.

    For your eyes only marked a turning point for the Moore years, but it's a shame he looked so unfit for parts of it.

    DC
  • Napoleon PluralNapoleon Plural LondonPosts: 10,467MI6 Agent
    I was watching The Sea Wolves over the weekend; Moore doesn't even try to hide his paunch in that film, which is like For Your Eyes Only on mogadon. :))
    "This is where we leave you Mr Bond."

    Roger Moore 1927-2017
  • NICKO FANNICKO FAN Posts: 47MI6 Agent
    I love AVTAK and I think Tanya Roberts is gorgeous in it, still not bad now. One thing I have noticed is that the incidental music in parts sounds exactly like the Cadburys flake advert from the same period. Listen to the part when the airship appears just before kidnapping Stacy and also the bit at the end with the snooper.
  • BlackleiterBlackleiter Washington, DCPosts: 5,615MI6 Agent
    Obviously different viewers saw different things in this film, but here's what I think of each of your points:

    - Yes, Roger Moore was way too old, but that in and of itself wouldn't be such a problem if he wasn't such a weak Bond to begin with. Sean Connery was pretty old when he appeared as Bond in Never Say Never Again (an admittedly disappointing Bond film), but he had loads more charm, energy and physical prowess than Roger Moore manifested at any point in AVTAK.
    - I agree that the score by John Barry was one of his better efforts
    - While I think Christopher Walken made for a good, creepy villain, he was wasted on an underwhelming adversary in the form of Moore's tired Bond
    - I found the action scenes to be mediocre at best, and a couple of them (e.g. the fire engine chase scene) to be downright boring

    On another point, I thought Tanya Roberts was one of the worst Bond girls ever. Sure, she is attractive in sort of a bland, generic way, but her acting was atrocious and she added absolutely nothing distinctive to the film. Sorry for you AVTAK admirers, but this movie is bottom of the barrel Bond.
    mrbain007 wrote:
    I always had a soft spot for A View to a Kill. Maybe it was because it was made the year of my birth :) Don't get me wrong its a far from great film however its still enjoyable for several reasons:
    -Roger Moore (despite admittedly being too old) was charming as ever
    -AVTAK had some of John Barry's best music (loved the "Dinner with Stacey" theme - so peaceful)
    -Christopher Walken made an excellent villain - a real psychotic
    -There were some brilliantly filmed action set pieces (such as the steeple chase, the elavator rescue and the Golden Gate Bridge fight) which made up for some dodgy ones ("California Girl" PTS, police chase)

    A lot of people sneer at Moore's Bond films now, which is a shame. In my opinion LALD, TSWLM, MR, FYEO, OP and AVTAK were all far more entertaining (and far more re-watchable) than QoS (which I like less the more I think about it X-( ). Yes they were silly but they were also fun, had character, had better villains and knew what type of films they wanted to be; even if they - for the most part - weren't like the Ian Fleming novels (I draw the line at MWTGG though, despite Christopher Lee's presence).
    "Felix Leiter, a brother from Langley."
  • Ricardo C.Ricardo C. Posts: 916MI6 Agent
    That chase with the fire engine is one of the most embrassing things to ever have been in a James Bond film. It's badly directed, editied, and acted. I could have stomached it a little bit more it wasn't for that idiotic police chief, sargent, or whoever that fat guy was who couldn't act for s***. Even John Landis' car chases seem like something out of Bullit compared to this garbage.
  • Napoleon PluralNapoleon Plural LondonPosts: 10,467MI6 Agent
    Obviously different viewers saw different things in this film, but here's what I think of each of your points:

    - Yes, Roger Moore was way too old, but that in and of itself wouldn't be such a problem if he wasn't such a weak Bond to begin with. Sean Connery was pretty old when he appeared as Bond in Never Say Never Again (an admittedly disappointing Bond film), but he had loads more charm, energy and physical prowess than Roger Moore manifested at any point in AVTAK.

    Really? I suppose I'd take Moore's Bob Holness/Nicholas Parson's routine over Connery's creaky Andrew Neill routine in NSNA, though such comparisons may be lost on you if you're not in the UK!

    When Moore is in the Eiffel Tower, asking about Zorin, there's a flash where he looks deadly serious and full of authority. Connery never has this in NSNA, yet it's his USP. When Moore goes after May Day, he has a kind of urgency that Connery doesn't have when he goes after Blush on his bike.
    "This is where we leave you Mr Bond."

    Roger Moore 1927-2017
  • BlackleiterBlackleiter Washington, DCPosts: 5,615MI6 Agent
    You're right about your comparisons being lost on me, because I have no idea who Bob Holness and Nicholas Parson are. But for me, Sean Connery merely standing in repose and raising an eyebrow is a hundred times more menancing than Roger Moore at his fiercest. Sorry friend, but Roger Moore just doesn't project danger very well. At best, he just seems annoyed!
    Obviously different viewers saw different things in this film, but here's what I think of each of your points:

    - Yes, Roger Moore was way too old, but that in and of itself wouldn't be such a problem if he wasn't such a weak Bond to begin with. Sean Connery was pretty old when he appeared as Bond in Never Say Never Again (an admittedly disappointing Bond film), but he had loads more charm, energy and physical prowess than Roger Moore manifested at any point in AVTAK.

    Really? I suppose I'd take Moore's Bob Holness/Nicholas Parson's routine over Connery's creaky Andrew Neill routine in NSNA, though such comparisons may be lost on you if you're not in the UK!

    When Moore is in the Eiffel Tower, asking about Zorin, there's a flash where he looks deadly serious and full of authority. Connery never has this in NSNA, yet it's his USP. When Moore goes after May Day, he has a kind of urgency that Connery doesn't have when he goes after Blush on his bike.
    "Felix Leiter, a brother from Langley."
Sign In or Register to comment.