Goldfinger Reproduction Rolex available here
MILKBONE
MICHIGANPosts: 65MI6 Agent
Hi everyone,
If you've been looking for the type of Rolex used by 007 in Goldfinger and Thunderball then look no farther. I've found a site that has them for sale at $188.00 USD. You'll need to change the strap, but that's any easy fix. Yes, I bought one and it looks beautiful.
You'll notice in the screen capture below that Bond's strap is a bit narrow for his watch, so I went to eBay and purchased an 18mm rather then the 22mm strap. Now it's a bit more screen correct.
Below is a photo of the watch from their web site:
And here's their link:
http://www.showmywatch.com/rolex-vintage-50s-james-bond-sub-6205-ss-black-dial-asia-2836-p-4374.html
Oh, and by the way, they shipped the watch via EMS (Express Mail Service) with Tracking and I had it in about 10 days.
ENJOY!
If you've been looking for the type of Rolex used by 007 in Goldfinger and Thunderball then look no farther. I've found a site that has them for sale at $188.00 USD. You'll need to change the strap, but that's any easy fix. Yes, I bought one and it looks beautiful.
You'll notice in the screen capture below that Bond's strap is a bit narrow for his watch, so I went to eBay and purchased an 18mm rather then the 22mm strap. Now it's a bit more screen correct.
Below is a photo of the watch from their web site:
And here's their link:
http://www.showmywatch.com/rolex-vintage-50s-james-bond-sub-6205-ss-black-dial-asia-2836-p-4374.html
Oh, and by the way, they shipped the watch via EMS (Express Mail Service) with Tracking and I had it in about 10 days.
ENJOY!
Comments
Bond’s Beretta
The Handguns of Ian Fleming's James Bond
I dive with a Suunto Stinger that is 300mtr waterproof(not that i am going that deep).
But I am thinking of buying one, as an original is to much for my wallet
" Sono Topolino, e tu chi saresti? ".
http://www.facebook.com/agent00univex
As for the Tom Ford replicas - well, the problem is, that there is a chance to find an original Rolex Submariner on ebay for example, the Tom Ford stuff is rare like hell so that's why people are going with Magnoli or other brands. Anyway, I'm collecting things connected with the Craig era only so the Rolex is not a concern of mine
Amen.
I meant don't of course My English is bad, I know ^^ Sorry
It might look OK in a pic, but I would love to see some actual owner-taken photos and hear about how it is in person. They never measure up in person.
I remember buying a knockoff when I was a kid and the old adage rang true:
"Good from afar, but far from good!"
One is much better off putting the money towards a quality watch (no matter what the make or price range) that will actually function; one that you can ACTUALLY wear when diving.
You can get a great quality dive watch starting at the same price such as Luminox, Seiko, etc.
OK Red, here are a couple of my actual owner-taken photos of the watch, hope you like them, and just so everyone knows, I do not wear this watch, never intended to wear it either, it is part of my 007 prop collection.
I collect Bond, I do not wear Bond.
I totally agree, if you want a REAL dive watch, one that you can actually wear while diving, then this is not the watch for you.
I think that it's okay, in my book - like the modern replicas of old Porsche 256 Speedsters and Shelby Cobras. They simply don't make the originals anymore, so replicas are the only route. However, I feel that it's the duty of anyone who owns these items to fess up. 'No, it's not an original Porsche 356 Speedster/Shelby Cobra. It's a replica.' 'No, it's a reproduction of a vintage 1960's Rolex they don't make anymore.' I don't think anyone would frown upon you for owning such an item if you're upfront about it, and why you own it.
Last point - just don't be fooled into thinking that you'll get a quality watch with this purchase. If I were considering this purchase, I'd contemplate buying it for parts only, and getting the dial/hands married to a watch and case with a real Swiss movement, like the Invicta 9936, which has a real ETA movement and not a Chinese copy. And, offers actual decent diving capability, so far as waterproofing is concerned.
Just please wear it for personal enjoyment, or openly as a replica; not in an attempt to hoodwink others. Otherwise it devalues the real deal.
Milkbone has stated clearly that this watch is for display purposes only and not meant for diving / wearing as a real Vintage Rolex Submariner.
I'm also not into fake watches at all ( i have purchased many in the past but realised it is much better to save up for a true, genuine timepiece of which I own too many now). However this particular watch (the genuine version) can go for up to 20,000 USD).
For collection purposes i think it is ok - if fact i have to say I REALLY love this one.
http://cgi.ebay.com/Vintage-Men-s-Rolex-Tudor-Submariner-/130511951034?pt=Wristwatches&hash=item1e631e54ba#ht_1749wt_1139
A vintage Tudor Submariner. Tudor is owned by Rolex, and Tudor watches were pretty much the same as the Rolex counterparts so far as appearance goes - the key difference was the fact that the movements were not manufactured in-house as with the main Rolex line; instead Rolex purchased movements from other watchmakers (from the 1960's onward it was mostly ETA, probably the most common of Swiss movement makers).
Vintage Tudors in good condition still can go for thousands, but it's easier to find the occasional deal on them, as many people don't realize what they are and what they might be worth. This gives you a watch with the look and feel of the vintage 007 timepiece - with real Rolex heritage - and none of the undercurrent of guilt that comes with owning a knockoff.
As for myself - the $200 copy might be a consideration for me if it didn't say 'Rolex' on it. That's just asking for it, I think. As I stated in the earlier post, I have no problem with reproductions of classic cars that are no longer manufactured - but I would draw the line at putting 'Porsche' or 'Ferrari' badges on such a thing. Creating an homage to a classic is one thing; trying to pass it off as the original is another. But that's just my opinion.
All very well collecting the "Real Deal" however many people can only dream of such high purchases and wouldnt be able to afford a vintage Rolex in their entire lifetime.
I agree with the post above - I have no issues with this watch being for a collection display etc. However wearing it?? I totally agree with you - no thanks!! Ive had many fake watches in the past when I was a poor student, they always eventually fail, delicate and seem to tarnish and get clogged up with crap easy compared to a real one etc.
Proud owner of a Omega Seamaster (Casino Royale version, not the 007 promo branded one) and now craving a Omega Planet Ocean and Rolex Sub! . Fortunately the Planet Ocean is possible with a bit of saving, the Rolex is going to take a while but saving for me is half the fun!!
www.justgiving.com/inMemoryOfLewisCollins
www.helpforheroes.org.uk
Totally agree! -{
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
He would get issued one. No need to pay anything
But we won't see the line: "... he had an instant look at his desktop, where the newest Submariner fake was stored away together with the PPK and the silencer"....
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
Your pics look better than what is on their site!
Do the luminous indices work?
I'm interested as to how well it keeps time, keep us posted!
Now, as I step down from my box of Tide (with built-in bleach and Fresh Meadow scent)...
However, for a home display I see no harm at all...beyond the fact that it helps keep the criminals in business.