Who should write the next Bond novel?
Number24
NorwayPosts: 22,334MI6 Agent
Lately more accopmplished authors have written Bond novels, like them or not. Which authors would you like to write Bonds?
My suggestions would be Phillip Kerr, the author of the Berlin Noir-series.
Perhaps a more leftfield suggestion is Jo Nesbo, the author of the Harry Hole crime series.
Suggestions? Comments?
My suggestions would be Phillip Kerr, the author of the Berlin Noir-series.
Perhaps a more leftfield suggestion is Jo Nesbo, the author of the Harry Hole crime series.
Suggestions? Comments?
Comments
Reflections in a double bourbon...
Roger Moore 1927-2017
I don't see the purpose of writing Bond novels in the present day with little or no connection to Fleming. They should be repackaged as something else, they are not Bond. I wouldn't buy another Deaver "Bond" and if you check out Amazon I'm not alone..............
J K Rowling , As Deaver has set up the "Boy Born to be a spy" angle in carte blanche. :v
Just missing out on the scar on the forehead, .......... Then again Bond has that scar on his Cheek. )
Class TP
Why not deaver?... Was carte Blanche so bad?
Who's this person ?:)
Or do you mean JR Hartley ?
Then buy glasses dear boy...then you too will see the brilliance of DC :v )
No...we ALL know the reason why you mess up the keyboard
One thing we know for certain is that there will be another book. While Carte Blanche was one of the weakest Bond novels, it has sold incredibly well. That alone is enough for IFP.
Surely, there is a better option than having Jeffery Deaver write another novel . . . the problem is, I cannot think of one.
Does anyone have a sound recommendation?
He is a British thriller writer who like Ian Fleming got his start as a newspaper writer. I have read several of his works and his style is very reminicent of Fleming's espically with reguard to weaponry and other technical equipment that spies and covert operations personel like the SAS use.
Roger Moore 1927-2017
Furst is British and has written ten highly acclaimed spy novels set in Europe during the 30`s and 40`s. His plots are solid and exiting, his writing is rich and atmospheric and his knowledge of Europe at the time is impressive, including the clandestine world of espionage.
I`m reading "The Foreign Correspondent" tonight. It` my first Alan Furst book, and I`m allready a fan. Other Furst novels are "Night Soldiers" and "The Spys of Balkan". Furst is considered by many to be one of the best writers of the spy genre today.
combination of wit, danger and contemporary creativity are in my opinion what's
needed... To say the least
I like the suggestion above, perhaps Philip Kerr who wrote the Berlin noir series should take a whack at it.
Richard
Couldn't agree more. I really like the book but the character may as well have been called Dave Johnson for all the relevance it had to bond.
If new authors would keep the characters in their place and time I could forgive some of the inadequacies of plotting and style (but not too much!), but taking them out of their time frame context seems to me to be trying to update something that isn't broken. Granted, the fictional year to year time frame Fleming placed Bond from CR through TMWTGG is established since he would comment on the actual season or month the story was taking place. However, I don't see why this would preclude having more novels about other missions within the same time frame. If keeping Bond in the 50's cold war era would constrain the size of a present day audience, then doesn't Flemings original series have the same problem?
The films series is just an entirely different animal. It has become so seperated over time from the original novels that it exists in its own universe. By turning the character into a digital (because can we at this time still use the word celluloid?) superman/noncaped crusader, the producers can keep him current with the times and even reboot the fanchise as they did. However, I will always consider the literary Bond a man of his time, and unless a new author comes along who is permitted to produce a new work with Bond's feet firmly planted in the cold war, I will continue to enjoy re-reading and re-examining the original canon. Had Gardner or Benson kept Bond in the 1950's, I might have been more induced into reading their efforts.
Atticus, have you read Wood's novelisations? They are set in the present, well 1970s of its time, but there is nothing unsettling about it. It is just skirted around.
Roger Moore 1927-2017
However at the risk of being cheeky, I think there a few half decent Fan Fiction writers who (with some sound, authoratitive, literary editing and advice) could concoct a novel at least as good as Deaver's and a darn sight better than Faulks'.