Questions re: British military?
Ammo08
Missouri, USAPosts: 387MI6 Agent
Why is it the Royal Air Force, Royal Navy, but not Royal Army?
"I don't know if the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or imbeciles who mean it."-Mark Twain
'Just because nobody complains doesn't mean all parachutes are perfect.'- Benny Hill (1924-1992)
'Just because nobody complains doesn't mean all parachutes are perfect.'- Benny Hill (1924-1992)
Comments
Parts of the army are 'Royal' - e.g. Royal Army Medical Corps. The army is made up of units which became united at some point in history and it was considered an honour for units to be granted 'royal' in their title.
Originally the RAF was a part of the army. It came from the Royal Flying Corps which if you work back came from the Royal Engineers and so was granted the title 'Royal' before it became separate.
There are various arguments about why the army as a whole has never been granted the 'royal' title. One is that whilst the navy was (on an island nation) only going to be used against outside enemies, the monarch could have turned the army on the people.
Making it the Army of the Country and not the Monarch.
And yes, it probably does have something to do with the supremacy of Parliament over the Crown and the monarchy - Oliver Cromwell, and later the Bill of Rights 1688, King William of Orange and the new Settlement that resulted after the Battle of the Boyne and the defeat of the absolutist King James I of England. Standing armies were viewed suspiciously by Britons, hence the lack of a 'royal' moniker. The armed forces therefore came under the command of the representatives of the people - MPs in Parliament - and Parliament is sovereign, at least until the advent of the EEC/EU, bit that's another story altogether, really.