Bond 24 & 25 to be shot back to back?
The Bond Vivant
SeendPosts: 1,347MI6 Agent
I was talking to a female friend yesterday, and her boyfriend works in security for some of the larger film shoots. He was asked about availability for the next Bind film, and was told that they will be shooting the next two films back to back to give continuity to Daniel Craig's look. Has anyone else heard any murmurings about this?
Blair
Blair
Comments
Two films back to back.
Yes, and anyway they've already done that for CR and QoS.
The Bond Vivant - Twitter
The Bond Vivant - Facebook
The Bond Vivant - YouTube
Oh, OK I see the difference now. Sorry for my misunderstanding. Given how long it takes them to get one new James Bond film out these days I very much doubt they will be filming two back to back though...
See a Blofeld trilogy -{ a story over three films.
That would be fantastic...but I'll be well and truly surprised/shocked if they actually do even two films back to back. I also tend to agree with the notion that #25 could well be Craigger's last - not because I want it that way, but because to play Bond at the physical level that Craig plays him makes it unlikely he'll hang on too deeply past his late forties. He's not likely to just farm out routine physical action to stuntmen (there are moments in OP and AVTAK where it looks as if Moore was never even on set for some sequences).
That said, I'd like to see Craig do at least five, and surpass Brozzer's tenure :007)
"I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
"Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
Really? I hadn't noticed! )
Hmmmm.......I haven't tried that yet, but thanks for the tip!
They offer laser treatment for older age patients eyes , too :v
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
People onset called it " Doing a Blackleiter" ) ) )
Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
I finally made it into the Bond lexicon! ) ) )
1: It would keep us fans happy that want to experience a yearly Bond, as it was back in the 1960s.
2: It would minimise the problems that may come with Daniel Craig getting too long in the tooth for the role. Don't want him doing a Roger Moore now do we? Craggy Craig suits the personal pain that Bond must suffer. But not TOO craggy.
Actually, I will lob in a number 3: Surely it has economies of scale for the studio/production costs, as well as a fluid look to the evolution of Bond's career... That might even be a number 4?
BACK 2 BACK please Babs and Micky W
-{ -{ -{ -{ -{ Still only managed five Vespers in a row. I will hit my Casino Royale Six soon. Maybe to celebrate a career milestone due in a year or two.
Oscar Wilde