Pros and Cons: From Russia With Love

Absolutely_Cart · December 2014

The 2nd Bond film, From Russia With Love (debuting in 1963, featuring Sean Connery again). Coming after Dr. No, it had a bigger budget but it also had to be rushed a bit as a next-year follow-up. Factoid: Watching this movie was one of the last things John F. Kennedy (an avid Bond fan, who helped spread the success of 007 to the United States) did before his assassination.

PROS:
[list=*]
[*]The KGB training sequence was a great opening![/*]
[*]Captures the Cold War atmosphere perfectly, with a perspective from each side[/*]
[*]Feels most authentic to the very roots of the spy series[/*]
[*]Memorable fight between Bond and Red Grant.[/*]
[*]Quality acting all around. Especially with Sean Connery.[/*]
[*]Great editing mixes suspense with brief but satisfying action bits[/*]
[*]Excellent at giving the viewer a sense of suspense[/*]
[*]1/3 of the movie is filmed on a train, which gives it an entertainingly claustrophobic feel.[/*]
[*]A few twists and turns after the climax on the train.[/*]
[/list]

CONS:
[list=*]
[*]Slow pacing in the first 40 or so minutes[/*]
[*]Misogyny & the catfight scenes[/*]
[/list]

Overall Thoughts
It strays apart from the formula started by the movies it was sandwiched in between (Dr. No and Goldfinger). While later movies have constant action, From Russia With Love built suspense well and that gave just 1 booby-trapped briefcase all the significance. Although I find other Bond movies more entertaining, this is still a very well made movie and a classic, of course.

AlphaOmegaSin · December 2014

Pros -

Amazing Locations
Amazing Soundtrack
Bond at his best
Great Cast

Cons

There are none in my Opinion -{

Absolutely_Cart · December 2014

If they cut out the catfight scene, they could have saved 15 minutes, made the movie flow a lot faster and cut out the misogyny.

Sir Hillary Bray · December 2014

Pros:
[list=*]
[*]More than any other Bond film, it stands alone as a great spy thriller, period.[/*]
[*]Robert Shaw not speaking for most of his time on screen -- very eerie.[/*]
[*]Bond's relationship with Kerim, his deepest in the entire series aside from Tracy, IMO.[/*]
[*]Train fight -- still one of the best in movie history. Amazing cuts between actors and stunt doubles.[/*]
[*]Terence Young's best directing -- my favorite is the long tracking shot as Bond, Tania and Benz board the train.[/*]
[*]The subtle bits of humor -- Kerim's boat, Anita Ekberg poster, Vavra (OK, he's not so subtle), etc.[/*]
[*]Helicopter homage to North by Northwest.[/*]
[*]A tight, easy-to-follow script.[/*]
[*]An underrated score -- not the best to listen to by itself, but it works magnificently in the film.[/*]
[*]Daniela Bianchi! :x [/*]
[/list]

Cons:
[list=*]
[*]Some obvious back-projection, most notably in Venice.[/*]
[*]I never could understand why Kronsteen got the boot when Klebb should have. Her man Grant messed up.![/*]
[*]I drink red wine with fish all the time!

[/*]
[/list]

Verdict:
[list=*]
[*]An absolute classic. If there had been only one Bond film ever made, this would be the one. That doesn't mean it's my favorite, just the best standalone film in the series.[/*]
[/list]

Absolutely_Cart · December 2014

I like how this film has enough depth to encourage analysis and an eye for a subtle detail, but at the same time its simple and it doesn't try to over-do anything.

I'm not sure this thread will get as many comments as the AVTAK thread. This is probably because people have more to say when they disagree with something than when they agree with it.

Blackleiter · December 2014

Sir Hillary Bray wrote:

Pros:
[list=*]
[*]More than any other Bond film, it stands alone as a great spy thriller, period.[/*]
[*]Robert Shaw not speaking for most of his time on screen -- very eerie.[/*]
[*]Bond's relationship with Kerim, his deepest in the entire series aside from Tracy, IMO.[/*]
[*]Train fight -- still one of the best in movie history. Amazing cuts between actors and stunt doubles.[/*]
[*]Terence Young's best directing -- my favorite is the long tracking shot as Bond, Tania and Benz board the train.[/*]
[*]The subtle bits of humor -- Kerim's boat, Anita Ekberg poster, Vavra (OK, he's not so subtle), etc.[/*]
[*]Helicopter homage to North by Northwest.[/*]
[*]A tight, easy-to-follow script.[/*]
[*]An underrated score -- not the best to listen to by itself, but it works magnificently in the film.[/*]
[*]Daniela Bianchi! :x [/*]
[/list]

Cons:
[list=*]
[*]Some obvious back-projection, most notably in Venice.[/*]
[*]I never could understand why Kronsteen got the boot when Klebb should have. Her man Grant messed up.![/*]
[*]I drink red wine with fish all the time! [/*]
[/list]

Verdict:
[list=*]
[*]An absolute classic. If there had been only one Bond film ever made, this would be the one. That doesn't mean it's my favorite, just the best standalone film in the series.[/*]
[/list]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
What he said. {[]

Absolutely_Cart · December 2014

Yeah, FRWL is an iconic film.

If Goldfinger is the definitive formula of a James Bond movie, then FRWL is the definitive atmosphere and vibe of a Bond film.

Firemass · December 2014

Excellent analysis Mr. Cart.

My only disagreement is I would place the pre-title sequence on the list of CONS, mainly due to the silly "Bond mask" having no relevance to actual training. (Unless Grant is a complete moron)

Since you're a relative newcomer to the Bond series, I was wondering if you thought the FRWL plot made sense in regards to Kronsteen's plan? or SPECTRE vs SMERSH ?

chrisisall · December 2014

Firemass wrote:

My only disagreement is I would place the pre-title sequence on the list of CONS, mainly due to the silly "Bond mask" having no relevance to actual training.

That was a pre-Mission: Impossible moment intended to fool audiences, not Grant.

Blackleiter · December 2014

chrisisall wrote:

Firemass wrote:

My only disagreement is I would place the pre-title sequence on the list of CONS, mainly due to the silly "Bond mask" having no relevance to actual training.

That was a pre-Mission: Impossible moment intended to fool audiences, not Grant.

Thank you! -{

Barbel · December 2014

Credit or blame Harry Saltzman for that.

chrisisall · December 2014

Barbel wrote:

Credit or blame Harry Saltzman for that.

Saltzman in a way created Mission: Impossible.

Firemass · December 2014

Blackleiter wrote:

chrisisall wrote:

Firemass wrote:

My only disagreement is I would place the pre-title sequence on the list of CONS, mainly due to the silly "Bond mask" having no relevance to actual training.

That was a pre-Mission: Impossible moment intended to fool audiences, not Grant.

Thank you! -{

That makes it okay? A bit short-sighted to think Bond audiences are only going to watch the film once.

)

chrisisall · December 2014

Firemass wrote:

That makes it okay? A bit short-sighted to think Bond audiences are only going to watch the film once. )

Silly silly British man.

)

Tecolote · December 2014

It my favorite Bond film, and I think the best. Being old enough to have watched DR NO in the theater, when FRWL came out to me it was like they got everything right now. Daniela Bianchi is my favorite of the Bond girls,still.It's also my wife's favoroite;suffice it to say if FRWL is on we'll watch it.
A note about the misogyny:back then remember that was normal for the times. Censors had other things on their minds...

Blackleiter · December 2014

Firemass wrote:

Blackleiter wrote:

chrisisall wrote:

That was a pre-Mission: Impossible moment intended to fool audiences, not Grant.

Thank you! -{

That makes it okay? A bit short-sighted to think Bond audiences are only going to watch the film once. )

I can't speak for others, but it sure is okay by me! I like the little twist to begin the film and it doesn't detract a bit from my enjoyment of repeated viewings. :007)

Thunderpussy · December 2014

I always liked the idea. Kill James Bond in the
first Five minutes of the film ! {[]

Moore Than · December 2014

I have never had a problem with the "Bond mask" in the PTS......But then I never had a problem with Bond wearing a stuffed bird on top of his head while swimming along underwater. Why potentially draw any kind of attention to himself when he is trying to remain undetected? Even the best of the films can be nitpicked but I'd prefer to just enjoy them.

Firemass · December 2014

Moore Than wrote:

Even the best of the films can be nitpicked but I'd prefer to just enjoy them.

True, but I'm not nitpicking in this case. The PTS has always bothered me, even back in my earliest days as a Bond fan.

Moore Than · December 2014

Firemass wrote:

Moore Than wrote:

Even the best of the films can be nitpicked but I'd prefer to just enjoy them.

True, but I'm not nitpicking in this case. The PTS has always bothered me, even back in my earliest days as a Bond fan.

No problem, Firemass. I respect your opinion.

chrisisall · December 2014

Well, I don't respect his opinion.
Hell, I don't even respect my own opinions.

)

Thunderpussy · December 2014

Hey don't be so quick to put yourself down Chrisisall.
There's a queue !, line up with the rest of us !

)
( only joking )

Absolutely_Cart · December 2014

I think that scene has a lot of replay value. I've watched it several times and it's still entertaining.

Virgil37 · December 2014

CONS.

* At times (very few) you notice the lack of budget (Kronsteen and Klebb first meeting with Blofeld).
* Use of DN soundtrack in certain moments.
* Fourteen minutes into the film until we see Bond (the real one) with Sylvia on screen.

The rest are all PROS: perfect cast, perfect locations, perfect scenes, great theme song. Classic movie making.

Virgil37 · December 2014

Sir Hillary Bray wrote:

Train fight -- still one of the best in movie history. Amazing cuts between actors and stunt doubles.

I would include the build up, how Bond fools Grant into opening the explosive attache. Masterful.

Thunderpussy · December 2014

{[] The train fight still looks brutal today, what it must
have looked like to a 60s audience. -{

chrisisall · December 2014

Thunderpussy wrote:

{[] The train fight still looks brutal today, what it must
have looked like to a 60s audience. -{

I have some small inkling having seen it on the big screen in a triple Bond feature when I was about 13- it moved so fast we could just barely make out what was going on. It must have shocked the Hell out of audiences in '63 though, being possibly the most brutal and vicious fist fights ever up to that point in time. It somewhat reminds me of the short but bloody swordfights in Japanese Samurai moves made in the same era...

Thunderpussy · December 2014

I can only compare it to the likes of westerns
or Cary Grant films of the day. With the odd punch
but no kicking or kidney punches etc. Brilliant fight. -{

VesperMelograno · December 2014

For all of my recent hating on SC, he does an excellent job of coming across as quite primal in that fight. And he somehow keeps the kitch factor low when he uses the attache case. It could have very easily taken an over the top turn.

Thunderpussy wrote:

{[] The train fight still looks brutal today, what it must
have looked like to a 60s audience. -{

Thunderpussy · December 2014

There's another great fight in Goldeneye
In the radar dish, -{

chrisisall · December 2014

Thunderpussy wrote:

There's another great fight in Goldeneye
In the radar dish, -{

And another good one (though not as brutal) on the cargo net in TLD. The one at the end of LTK is sort of ugly-brutal.
But yeah, the GE one is pretty amazing.

Pros and Cons: From Russia With Love

Comments