Spectre's script problems shouldn't be held against it
Absolutely_Cart
NJ/NYC, United StatesPosts: 1,740MI6 Agent
Calling a gloomy forecast because of the leaks doesn't make sense, as it's not fair to judge a product that's only in beta. Especially when it seems the team is very open to constructive criticism and dedicated toward fixing the mistakes.
I'm sure lots of acclaimed films, even in the Bond series, had to go through lots of rewrites.
I'm sure lots of acclaimed films, even in the Bond series, had to go through lots of rewrites.
Comments
In any case, how many times do we watch these films over and over again, even though we know what's going to happen and know a lot of the script off by heart. I could watch any Bond film tomorrow and still enjoy it as much as the first time. -{
AJB007 Favorite Film Rankings
Pros and Cons Compendium (50 Years)
AJB007 Favorite Film Rankings
Pros and Cons Compendium (50 Years)
My understanding is that early versions of the script were leaked but also the final draft version from approx early December featuring the reported extensive re-writes by Purvis & Wade. I read a couple of pages that contained comments from studio exec/s? on certain aspects of the early versions, that was enough for me.
Indeed. Many Bond scripts have been re-written, both good ones and bad ones. Many people here like Casino Royale, and that was rewritten from the original. I wouldn't be surprised if rewriting film scripts is a very common thing, and giving Spectre a gloomy forecast because the script had to be rewritten is uncalled for.
I absolutely agree with you, and I'm glad that I haven't bothered to look at any of the leaked material or pay much attention to the so-called "problems" with the filming. The finished product is all that matters to me.
Idea about problems. the final Movie is all that counts.
Not all are...some are quite recent...depends upon which you've seen - obviously...
I know some things in it certainly attracted some criticism. Maybe the writers saw some of the feedback and will make an even better film?
Script re-writing and polishing is very common, the scripts can pass through a large number of writers hands before they get the final "shooting script".
I read in a film book that they can go through five or six re-writes, and a few polishes, and then still change things even whilst actually filming if a better idea comes along whilst on set.
Sometimes something that really works on paper just does not translate very well when they actually film it, so they can change it there and then if they have a better idea. Interesting thing is, the ad-hoc idea can come from anywhere, the actor, the director, the guy who does the lighting, a props guy etc...
From what I have read, it happens a lot more than you would think too.
If you download and read a final shooting script and then watch the actual film, you will notice differences between the shooting script and what is actually on the screen in pretty much any one you choose.
I agree, I have high hopes for SPECTRE, I think it will be great.
facebook.com/catchingbullets
www.markoconnell.co.uk
X2!
Reportedly, Jez Butterworth also has had a hand in the SPECTRE script. He was brought in by Sam Mendes around Sept/Oct last year to "polish" the script.
Bond movies improve with rewrittes. That extra year in between movies (3 years instead of 2), really pays off. That's why QoS is the weakest of Craig's. They didn't have time for rewritting the material. SPECTRE is going to be great.
QOS is the exception - not the rule.
AJB007 Favorite Film Rankings
Pros and Cons Compendium (50 Years)
The writers strike also played a big part in QOS's script problems. The choice of director also didn't help.
It didn't feel like any of Forster's other films I've seen. It's like he felt that he had to copy other action films and didn't think his own style was appropriate.
QOS truly had a weak script and my theory is that Forster resorted to a lot of film making tricks to cover up the lack of story.
The fact is that all major motion pictures go through numerous re-writes.
That's not a rare. A sript might have a great story, and it's brilliant, but 9 out of 10 times it needs further work. Dialogues can be improved, scenes can be made more tense, characters can be given more weight, etc, etc. It's said that the last draft of the script is the first cut of the movie, and it still will be improved upon a few times until reaching final cut.
No one gets it right the first time. Unless you are Orson Welles and Hermann Mankiewicz, that is...