Don't Judge Too Harshly...(My Spectre Ramblings)

James SuzukiJames Suzuki New ZealandPosts: 2,406MI6 Agent
This is not one of those, ‘Spectre is going to be a good film’ threads which get closed by a moderator in mere minutes. I have just been thinking about this issue for a few days now, and I wanted to get something off my chest. There is no such thing as a perfect Bond Film, out of the 23 films in this franchise, none of them is perfect. Sure some are closer to the mark than others, but if anyone is sitting in the movie cinema expecting the latest Citizen Kane, they’ll be disappointed. I know I sound cynical but I think we need to acknowledge the Bond films as escapism and fun. Yes, because the word fun can exist in the film industry. We are too quick, the internet and people in general, to judge a film before it is even released. Cinema itself is incredibly subjective. Because face it, there will be things in Spectre which people will not like.
-That fight scene went on for too long.
-The soundtrack in places was jarring and out of place.
-Too much humour! Reminded me like we had returned to the 70’s again.
-Zero Fleming material used.
And I think some of us go in looking for things to hate. We want to moan about the placement of the gun barrel or the acting of the Bond Girls. We then go on to compare the latest 21st century Bond films to our favourite films, let’s see, OHMSS, TLD, etc.
If Spectre does not cause us to have the same level of excitement as we experienced watching those films, then the rating drops in our minds and we fall into the Hate Club.
The reality is that our favourite Bond Films take time to reach the top of our list.
In some respects, a Bond Film is digested over time. My opinion of Skyfall changed after every view I had of it. And my view of CR and QOS changed as well. And I can say this statement as a true Bond Fan, All of the James Bond Films have Merit.
Because those Bond films we cherish the most, for me it’s FYEO, create a world of its own. We don’t just fall for the film itself, but for the time it was released, perhaps the memories we have when that film came out or when we first watched it. Who we were with?
It is the classic ‘Golden Age’ mentality. The past always seems better than the present. And as a Fan Community, Bond Fans are a stubborn lot. We are against the idea of change. Some of us hate it. Yet we can’t expect a 60’s film anymore, with 60’s values and ideas. The beauty of the Bond Franchise is its amazing ability to adapt to different eras. That’s why we it’s still going on after 53 years.
We are very fortunate to have the Bond Series still expanding. How long do you think this community would last if there were no more Bond films anymore? Sure for a little while…
We should be thankful that the Bond Producers seem to show some care for James Bond, and are not just in it for the money. There definitely is a level of thought and care seen in Casino Royale and definitely in Skyfall.
From the trailers and what I’ve seen so far, I can say that Spectre may not be the next holy grail Bond film. And even if it blows you away in the first viewing (as I’m expecting), it will still take time to sit still, compared to the other films.
So don’t judge it to harshly, sure don’t have your expectations too high, but take it for what it is. A lot of money spent on a film for our enjoyment.
Sorry I just had to go out and say that. I am really looking forward to Spectre, and I want everyone else to be as well.
“The scent and smoke and sweat of a casino are nauseating at three in the morning. "
-Casino Royale, Ian Fleming

Comments

  • Charmed & DangerousCharmed & Dangerous Posts: 7,358MI6 Agent
    Very good and thoughtful post, JS. {[]
    .
    In some respects, a Bond Film is digested over time. My opinion of Skyfall changed after every view I had of it. And my view of CR and QOS changed as well. And I can say this statement as a true Bond Fan, All of the James Bond Films have Merit.

    I particularly agree with this statement about the last three films. -{
    "How was your lamb?" "Skewered. One sympathises."
  • James SuzukiJames Suzuki New ZealandPosts: 2,406MI6 Agent
    Very good and thoughtful post, JS. {[]
    .
    In some respects, a Bond Film is digested over time. My opinion of Skyfall changed after every view I had of it. And my view of CR and QOS changed as well. And I can say this statement as a true Bond Fan, All of the James Bond Films have Merit.

    I particularly agree with this statement about the last three films. -{
    Thanks -{
    It's a great feeling hearing positive responses from posts.
    “The scent and smoke and sweat of a casino are nauseating at three in the morning. "
    -Casino Royale, Ian Fleming
  • Gassy ManGassy Man USAPosts: 2,972MI6 Agent
    Yeah, while I agree with the general premise that people will like or hate things, and that taste is individual, I'm not sure the details work as well. The idea, for instance, of what you call the "golden age" mentality as a yard stick -- one reason the current Bond films work, perhaps the primary one, is because they returned to some of the ideals of that very age, including the uber-masculine, swaggering Bond instead of the 80s and 90s male model type. And for years, people said no one would ever accept the Connery-esque Bond again, the supervillain with the gigantic lair, Erst Stavro Blofeld specifically, and other elements that so defined that era. They were wrong, to the tune of hundreds of millions more dollars in ticket sales.

    So, while I appreciate the sentiment that Bond fans should keep an open mind, I don't agree that criticisms are without merit, nor that some ultimately are shown to have more than others. Given that films by definition are meant to be viewed once (even though today's viewer may choose to view them more than once), their effect should be immediate. So should our assessment of those films. Given that the marketing people all but release the film in the ramp up to the actual premier, too, means that people are bound to form opinions from the information.

    The thing is, the Bond series is also experiencing a renaissance. We have not seen this level of general audience excitement since the 1960s, and the budgets -- staggering even by contemporary standards -- means that the filmmakers should be held to a higher standard. They are no longer making second-rate action films, as they more or less did in the 80s and 90s. Thus, the expectations can rise, too. Of course, the more the build up, the greater the fall when it does not work. And while Skyfall, to me, was a good but not great Bond film, it's box office performance suggests Spectre needs to do better on all fronts as a tent pole film.
  • James SuzukiJames Suzuki New ZealandPosts: 2,406MI6 Agent
    I really appreciated your well-thought out response gassy man.
    And I have to actually agree with what you brought up. The returning of past tropes being one of them.
    And Critiscm does come with merit. (Cough Cough Die Another Day Cough Cough)
    And Yes, Bond series is in a Renaissance and it is a very exciting time to be in!
    “The scent and smoke and sweat of a casino are nauseating at three in the morning. "
    -Casino Royale, Ian Fleming
  • Bondage007Bondage007 AustraliaPosts: 371MI6 Agent
    The vibes I'm getting from Bond forums at the moment about Spectre are positive, so while you are correct about Bond fans being a stubborn lot, I wouldn't jump on the "Bond fans are negative about Spectre" bandwagon just yet.

    The main negativity is towards the theme song, and to a lesser extent the yellowness of the Mexico scenes and the CGI.
    2019 Bondathon...in progress (6) FRWL (7) GE (8) FYEO (9) TND (10) MR (11) GF (12) LALD (13) DAF (14) LTK (15) TMWTGG (16) TB (17) TSWLM (18) DAD (19) AVTAK (20) YOLT (21) QOS (22) SF (23) TWINE (24) SP
  • broadshoulderbroadshoulder Acton, London, UKPosts: 1,363MI6 Agent
    Bondage007 wrote:
    The vibes I'm getting from Bond forums at the moment about Spectre are positive, so while you are correct about Bond fans being a stubborn lot, I wouldn't jump on the "Bond fans are negative about Spectre" bandwagon just yet.

    The main negativity is towards the theme song, and to a lesser extent the yellowness of the Mexico scenes and the CGI.

    See? Your doing it already?

    Mind you, I went with an open mind to some of Brosnans........and look what happened there.....
    1. For Your Eyes Only 2. The Living Daylights 3 From Russia with Love 4. Casino Royale 5. OHMSS 6. Skyfall
  • writingsonthewallwritingsonthewall SpainPosts: 424MI6 Agent
    Hmm. Nice thoughts here from everyone.

    I don't know that more modern films will take some time for fans to grow into them. I was raised on Sir Rog's era, yet the siliness was a bit too much with the test of time. Thanks to video rental, I watched all the previous ones (and decided SC was the ULTIMATE Bond), then I was there for TD's two forays, liked GE a lot, the rest of PB's not so much... yet when CR arrived, I almost immediately fell in love with it. Sure, I had some issued with the partial reboot, but they paled in comparison to the sheer enjoyment I got out of DC's first outing as the character. To me, it had the perfect blend of action, drama, character portrait (without being too obvious), suspense and stunts.

    QoS was a bit of a disappointment (we have extensively discussed the whys in this forum) and SF... well, I will concur that it's a good film, but just an ok Bond film. Too moody at places, too carbon copying things of the past only in the surface, and trying to be too grandiose for its own good. And (SPOILER!!!) - the bad guy gets exactly what he wants.

    We'll see about Spectre. I, as all of us, I guess, want it to be great, but will settle for good. At the end of the day, I just want to leave the theatre with two hours of fun, action and enjoyment under my belt, plus some exciting visuals and, of course, wardrobe obsessions...
    "Enjoy it while it lasts."
    "The very words I live by."
  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy Behind you !Posts: 63,792MI6 Agent
    I'm a Bond fan ! ( yes, I'm out and proud !) ;) and to be honest, lately. I'm
    Finding it really annoying that Spectre hasn't even been released yet and
    Already there's heaps of negative posts about it. :#
    Especially the theme song, a tiny bit of CGI in the trailer etc. It's as if some
    people want to win the " I was the first to dislike/ spot that mistake award"
    then point it out for years to come.
    I don't know if it's a "Superfan" mentality thing, almost a need to show superiority
    over other fans, by being so critical over very minor points. I don't know about
    others but at the moment I'm basking in the great feeling of .... ( only my taste and
    Opinion, can only say how I feel) :D

    A great theme song, not good or passable, but a great classic theme. That will stand
    the test of time and one we'll be hearing played over film footage on future documentaries
    and not just Bond documentaries.
    A superb Bond in Daniel Craig, very physical but also very human, so making what
    Bond does. Not superman stuff but superhuman, a very different thing. He's one of
    my top Bonds.
    A splendid cast, one of the best ever brought together for any film not just a Bond.
    Jaw dropping cinematography, wonderful sets and score. The stunt work looks amazing
    too.
    Yet despite all this, some want to complain over a three second clip, with ( in their
    opinion) bad CGI !
    After I see Spectre, if I have any problems with it, I'll post them. Until then, I'm ignoring
    All the usual doom and gloom crew, and living in the lovely warm glow of a Bond theme
    landing a number one hit. A New Bond film which looks to be spectacular, and another
    Huge hit. A Fantastic Bond ( one of the best) {[]
    I have a feeling if the internet had been around in the 60s, many Bond films would have
    been pulled apart by the " Fan critics" before release.
    "I've been informed that there ARE a couple of QAnon supporters who are fairly regular posters in AJB."
  • Bondage007Bondage007 AustraliaPosts: 371MI6 Agent
    Bondage007 wrote:
    The vibes I'm getting from Bond forums at the moment about Spectre are positive, so while you are correct about Bond fans being a stubborn lot, I wouldn't jump on the "Bond fans are negative about Spectre" bandwagon just yet.

    The main negativity is towards the theme song, and to a lesser extent the yellowness of the Mexico scenes and the CGI.

    See? Your doing it already?

    Mind you, I went with an open mind to some of Brosnans........and look what happened there.....

    I am? Where? I was just saying that from what I've read, especially on MI6Community, people are going apeshit over the above 3 things I mentioned. TBH that forum is a hive of negativity
    2019 Bondathon...in progress (6) FRWL (7) GE (8) FYEO (9) TND (10) MR (11) GF (12) LALD (13) DAF (14) LTK (15) TMWTGG (16) TB (17) TSWLM (18) DAD (19) AVTAK (20) YOLT (21) QOS (22) SF (23) TWINE (24) SP
  • broadshoulderbroadshoulder Acton, London, UKPosts: 1,363MI6 Agent
    Bondage007 wrote:
    [H that forum is a hive of negativity

    I can believe that...
    1. For Your Eyes Only 2. The Living Daylights 3 From Russia with Love 4. Casino Royale 5. OHMSS 6. Skyfall
  • HoagieHoagie Posts: 48MI6 Agent
    Ok, not been on for a while, but things are hotting up so I feel like getting involved now!! Mostly to respond to the comments about bad CGI. DAD, CGI I admit was overused, and the tech was really not up to the job at that time, especially to re create real world effects. Now I don't mind a bit being used if it's needed and not just for the sake of not doing a real stunt....it also looks pretty convincing in my humble...

    Also, Scaramangas car didn't turn into a Plane for real...it was a radio controlled model..we all knew this and are happy to susupend disbelief for a few seconds. The plane on the opening credits of FYEO did not fly through the hanger on one side...it was pulled through on a rope...again something we know. The Russian MIG jets in Goldeneye were clearly made by airfix, and hung off a piece of string....I won't go on...just to say that CGI is just a new effect that means that models and bits of string don't have to be used any more (always get annoyed when water droplets look far too big in set piece scenes a la the fllooding of the mine in avtak!)

    A bit of CGI used sparingly works to the films advantage in my opinion, and I won't let that spoil my enjoyment at all.
  • Bondage007Bondage007 AustraliaPosts: 371MI6 Agent
    Hoagie wrote:
    Now I don't mind a bit being used if it's needed and not just for the sake of not doing a real stunt....it also looks pretty convincing in my humble...

    Also, Scaramangas car didn't turn into a Plane for real...it was a radio controlled model..we all knew this and are happy to susupend disbelief for a few seconds. The plane on the opening credits of FYEO did not fly through the hanger on one side...it was pulled through on a rope...again something we know. The Russian MIG jets in Goldeneye were clearly made by airfix, and hung off a piece of string....I won't go on...just to say that CGI is just a new effect that means that models and bits of string don't have to be used any more (always get annoyed when water droplets look far too big in set piece scenes a la the fllooding of the mine in avtak!)

    A bit of CGI used sparingly works to the films advantage in my opinion, and I won't let that spoil my enjoyment at all.

    It's a good point and one not often raised.

    But using SF as an example, the CGI quite well done, but when you have the LALD alligator stunt as a benchmark, the komodo scene falls flat. They did it properly as recently as CR, mostly if not all done for real.
    2019 Bondathon...in progress (6) FRWL (7) GE (8) FYEO (9) TND (10) MR (11) GF (12) LALD (13) DAF (14) LTK (15) TMWTGG (16) TB (17) TSWLM (18) DAD (19) AVTAK (20) YOLT (21) QOS (22) SF (23) TWINE (24) SP
  • JimatayJimatay Posts: 126MI6 Agent
    Hoagie wrote:
    The plane on the opening credits of FYEO did not fly through the hanger on one side...it was pulled through on a rope...again something we know.

    I know that was in Octopussy ;)
  • BondpuristBondpurist VauxhallPosts: 26MI6 Agent
    This is not one of those, ‘Spectre is going to be a good film’ threads which get closed by a moderator in mere minutes. I have just been thinking about this issue for a few days now, and I wanted to get something off my chest. There is no such thing as a perfect Bond Film, out of the 23 films in this franchise, none of them is perfect. Sure some are closer to the mark than others, but if anyone is sitting in the movie cinema expecting the latest Citizen Kane, they’ll be disappointed. I know I sound cynical but I think we need to acknowledge the Bond films as escapism and fun. Yes, because the word fun can exist in the film industry. We are too quick, the internet and people in general, to judge a film before it is even released. Cinema itself is incredibly subjective. Because face it, there will be things in Spectre which people will not like.
    -That fight scene went on for too long.
    -The soundtrack in places was jarring and out of place.
    -Too much humour! Reminded me like we had returned to the 70’s again.
    -Zero Fleming material used.
    And I think some of us go in looking for things to hate. We want to moan about the placement of the gun barrel or the acting of the Bond Girls. We then go on to compare the latest 21st century Bond films to our favourite films, let’s see, OHMSS, TLD, etc.
    If Spectre does not cause us to have the same level of excitement as we experienced watching those films, then the rating drops in our minds and we fall into the Hate Club.
    The reality is that our favourite Bond Films take time to reach the top of our list.
    In some respects, a Bond Film is digested over time. My opinion of Skyfall changed after every view I had of it. And my view of CR and QOS changed as well. And I can say this statement as a true Bond Fan, All of the James Bond Films have Merit.
    Because those Bond films we cherish the most, for me it’s FYEO, create a world of its own. We don’t just fall for the film itself, but for the time it was released, perhaps the memories we have when that film came out or when we first watched it. Who we were with?
    It is the classic ‘Golden Age’ mentality. The past always seems better than the present. And as a Fan Community, Bond Fans are a stubborn lot. We are against the idea of change. Some of us hate it. Yet we can’t expect a 60’s film anymore, with 60’s values and ideas. The beauty of the Bond Franchise is its amazing ability to adapt to different eras. That’s why we it’s still going on after 53 years.
    We are very fortunate to have the Bond Series still expanding. How long do you think this community would last if there were no more Bond films anymore? Sure for a little while…
    We should be thankful that the Bond Producers seem to show some care for James Bond, and are not just in it for the money. There definitely is a level of thought and care seen in Casino Royale and definitely in Skyfall.
    From the trailers and what I’ve seen so far, I can say that Spectre may not be the next holy grail Bond film. And even if it blows you away in the first viewing (as I’m expecting), it will still take time to sit still, compared to the other films.
    So don’t judge it to harshly, sure don’t have your expectations too high, but take it for what it is. A lot of money spent on a film for our enjoyment.
    Sorry I just had to go out and say that. I am really looking forward to Spectre, and I want everyone else to be as well.

    This is a great, and thoughtful post, James. Your thoughts are spot-on. As time goes on, opinions towards certain films change. When I was young, I hated Thunderball, because I found the underwater scenes too laborious at points, and frenetic at others. But, as I've grown older, it's my favorite Connery movie, and for 1965, the underwater scenes are phenomenal.

    But, more recently, I saw Skyfall in an advance media screening, and walked out of it devastated. Hated it. For all the hype surrounding Skyfall, I felt Silva's motive was weak, and that his character was a such a departure from past Bond villains that I found it extremely unnerving. But, when I re-watched it for the second time on premiere night, Silva grew on me. To this day, Skyfall ranks in my top 5 of films. It's one of the most aesthetically-pleasing films, and arguably, has one of the best suspenseful action scenes (Parliament shootout).

    Bond films are like wine, some age betters than others. :007)
  • HoagieHoagie Posts: 48MI6 Agent
    Jimatay wrote:
    Hoagie wrote:
    The plane on the opening credits of FYEO did not fly through the hanger on one side...it was pulled through on a rope...again something we know.

    I know that was in Octopussy ;)
    Good point well made....I'll get my coat!
  • MrBeechMrBeech Denver, COPosts: 57MI6 Agent
    I really believe this "Golden Age" theory is quite accurate, primarily because the idea crosses through many many things. I have a friend who works in the coffee industry and he's told me about the "honeymoon effect" of how many people are convinced that Kona coffee from Hawaii is vastly superior to everything else when in reality it boils down to the fact that these people were on Honeymoon, having the vacation of a lifetime. The feelings associated with that time in their lives were almost more important in creating what they believed "good coffee" was. The same could be said for why most people listen to a lot of the same music they listened to in high school and college. This was their first exposure to music they could try and relate to and embrace and so it creates a deeper emotional bond(no pun intended). And every generation thinks the next generation's music is somewhat inferior. And while just about everyone on this site may have started with one Bond and then maybe found a different Bond that became their favorite...their first Bond, and all of the stylistic components of that era, will always put a spin on what they consider to be key in making a "good" Bond movie. All that being said, I do agree that the best Bond movies will rise past conditioned responses to show their worth.

    All that being said, I'm super psyched for SPECTRE! I know it won't be perfect (*cough cough* title song**) but based on all the trailers I've seen, there certainly far more evidence of a potential classic. But I certainly don't know if it's good or bad at this point...THAT will probably take years.

    -{ -{
    Yes...considerably...
  • OrnithologistOrnithologist BerlinPosts: 585MI6 Agent
    MrBeech wrote:
    a deeper emotional bond(no pun intended)

    Which bond are you thinking about? Misty-eyed Dalton (would never have noticed without Higgins but have to support my compatriot's favorite subject)? Brosnan at the beach in GE? Craig in CoS? :))
    MrBeech wrote:
    And while just about everyone on this site may have started with one Bond and then maybe found a different Bond that became their favorite...their first Bond, and all of the stylistic components of that era, will always put a spin on what they consider to be key in making a "good" Bond movie.

    So true.
    "I'm afraid I'm a complicated woman. "
    "- That is something to be afraid of."
  • LoeffelholzLoeffelholz The United States, With LovePosts: 8,998Quartermasters
    I've recently coined a term: Premature CondemnationTM. It probably reached its zenith during the Craig Wars (that period of time between the news of Craig's very controversial casting, and CR's certification as a box office smash and classic), but still shows up in tiny doses, each and every day, on fan sites everywhere. Perhaps the most recent example is the speculation that SPECTRE will suck because of Sam Smith :))
    Check out my Amazon author page! Mark Loeffelholz
    "I am not an entrant in the Shakespeare Stakes." - Ian Fleming
    "Screw 'em." - Daniel Craig, The Best James Bond EverTM
  • MrBeechMrBeech Denver, COPosts: 57MI6 Agent
    MrBeech wrote:
    a deeper emotional bond(no pun intended)

    Which bond are you thinking about? Misty-eyed Dalton (would never have noticed without Higgins but have to support my compatriot's favorite subject)? Brosnan at the beach in GE? Craig in CoS? :))

    Oooooh, Misty-eyed Dalton will get you every time. I'm pretty sure I found the meaning of life in those big blues. :))
    Yes...considerably...
  • James SuzukiJames Suzuki New ZealandPosts: 2,406MI6 Agent
    MrBeech wrote:
    I really believe this "Golden Age" theory is quite accurate, primarily because the idea crosses through many many things. I have a friend who works in the coffee industry and he's told me about the "honeymoon effect" of how many people are convinced that Kona coffee from Hawaii is vastly superior to everything else when in reality it boils down to the fact that these people were on Honeymoon, having the vacation of a lifetime. The feelings associated with that time in their lives were almost more important in creating what they believed "good coffee" was. The same could be said for why most people listen to a lot of the same music they listened to in high school and college. This was their first exposure to music they could try and relate to and embrace and so it creates a deeper emotional bond(no pun intended). And every generation thinks the next generation's music is somewhat inferior. And while just about everyone on this site may have started with one Bond and then maybe found a different Bond that became their favorite...their first Bond, and all of the stylistic components of that era, will always put a spin on what they consider to be key in making a "good" Bond movie. All that being said, I do agree that the best Bond movies will rise past conditioned responses to show their worth.

    All that being said, I'm super psyched for SPECTRE! I know it won't be perfect (*cough cough* title song**) but based on all the trailers I've seen, there certainly far more evidence of a potential classic. But I certainly don't know if it's good or bad at this point...THAT will probably take years.

    -{ -{
    excellent post here! Expanded my thoughts more than I could have
    “The scent and smoke and sweat of a casino are nauseating at three in the morning. "
    -Casino Royale, Ian Fleming
  • Agent KinoAgent Kino New YorkPosts: 202MI6 Agent
    This is not one of those, ‘Spectre is going to be a good film’ threads which get closed by a moderator in mere minutes. I have just been thinking about this issue for a few days now, and I wanted to get something off my chest. There is no such thing as a perfect Bond Film, out of the 23 films in this franchise, none of them is perfect. Sure some are closer to the mark than others, but if anyone is sitting in the movie cinema expecting the latest Citizen Kane, they’ll be disappointed. I know I sound cynical but I think we need to acknowledge the Bond films as escapism and fun. Yes, because the word fun can exist in the film industry. We are too quick, the internet and people in general, to judge a film before it is even released. Cinema itself is incredibly subjective. Because face it, there will be things in Spectre which people will not like.
    -That fight scene went on for too long.
    -The soundtrack in places was jarring and out of place.
    -Too much humour! Reminded me like we had returned to the 70’s again.
    -Zero Fleming material used.
    And I think some of us go in looking for things to hate. We want to moan about the placement of the gun barrel or the acting of the Bond Girls. We then go on to compare the latest 21st century Bond films to our favourite films, let’s see, OHMSS, TLD, etc.
    If Spectre does not cause us to have the same level of excitement as we experienced watching those films, then the rating drops in our minds and we fall into the Hate Club.
    The reality is that our favourite Bond Films take time to reach the top of our list.
    In some respects, a Bond Film is digested over time. My opinion of Skyfall changed after every view I had of it. And my view of CR and QOS changed as well. And I can say this statement as a true Bond Fan, All of the James Bond Films have Merit.
    Because those Bond films we cherish the most, for me it’s FYEO, create a world of its own. We don’t just fall for the film itself, but for the time it was released, perhaps the memories we have when that film came out or when we first watched it. Who we were with?
    It is the classic ‘Golden Age’ mentality. The past always seems better than the present. And as a Fan Community, Bond Fans are a stubborn lot. We are against the idea of change. Some of us hate it. Yet we can’t expect a 60’s film anymore, with 60’s values and ideas. The beauty of the Bond Franchise is its amazing ability to adapt to different eras. That’s why we it’s still going on after 53 years.
    We are very fortunate to have the Bond Series still expanding. How long do you think this community would last if there were no more Bond films anymore? Sure for a little while…
    We should be thankful that the Bond Producers seem to show some care for James Bond, and are not just in it for the money. There definitely is a level of thought and care seen in Casino Royale and definitely in Skyfall.
    From the trailers and what I’ve seen so far, I can say that Spectre may not be the next holy grail Bond film. And even if it blows you away in the first viewing (as I’m expecting), it will still take time to sit still, compared to the other films.
    So don’t judge it to harshly, sure don’t have your expectations too high, but take it for what it is. A lot of money spent on a film for our enjoyment.
    Sorry I just had to go out and say that. I am really looking forward to Spectre, and I want everyone else to be as well.

    This is an absolutely amazing post.

    As a 22 year old Bond fan, I did not get to grow up with the old timer Bond films. However, as I have watched each film, they do grow on me and ones I didn't like at first end up becoming my top films.

    You have an excellent point. We can't expect perfect, we should expect a good "Bond film."
    1. Goldfinger 2. Skyfall 3. Goldeneye 4. The Spy Who Loved Me 5. OHMSS
    Check out my Instagram: @livingthebondlife
    "I never joke about my work, 007."
  • blame_thatcherblame_thatcher Posts: 199MI6 Agent
    No film is an instant classic. Films become classics over time, as the passing of days, months and years reveals things not initially seen.
  • James SuzukiJames Suzuki New ZealandPosts: 2,406MI6 Agent
    No film is an instant classic. Films become classics over time, as the passing of days, months and years reveals things not initially seen.
    this reminds of me of the creation of the Beach Boys "pet sounds" album of 1966. Now it's considered one of the most influential Rock/pop albums ever made, but it had a difficult production and early negative critic response. Why? Because it was so different to anything mainstream Western music had ever heard. It was jarring compared to their previous endless Summer songs, and the music of that era. Classics only become classics when they are given merit outside of the society in which they were created in. E.g- Great Expectations after the Victorian Period.
    “The scent and smoke and sweat of a casino are nauseating at three in the morning. "
    -Casino Royale, Ian Fleming
Sign In or Register to comment.