Rating films by adding the sum of its parts

2»

Comments

  • am747am747 Posts: 720MI6 Agent
    edited December 2015
    Decade average:

    1. 1960s = 45.5
    2. 1970s = 42.2
    3. 1980s = 41.0
    4. 2010s = 40.0
    5. 1990s = 37.7
    6. 2000s = 36.3

    Overall average per film = 41.35 (41)
  • HigginsHiggins GermanyPosts: 16,618MI6 Agent
    am747 wrote:
    Decade average:

    1. 1960s = 45.5
    2. 1970s = 42.2
    3. 1980s = 41.0
    4. 2010s = 40.0
    5. 1990s = 37.7
    6. 2000s = 36.3

    Overall average per film = 41.35 (41)
    am747 wrote:

    48 = FRWL and OHMSS
    46 = DN
    45 = GF and TSWLM
    44 = TB, LALD, OP and TLD
    42 = YOLT and TMWTGG
    41 = DAF, LTK and SP
    40 = FYEO
    39 = MR, TND, TWINE, CR and SF
    36 = AVTAK
    35 = GE, DAD and QoS


    Decade average:
    1. 1960s = 45.5
    2. 1970s = 42.2
    3. 1980s = 41.0
    4. 2010s = 40.0
    5. 1990s = 37.7
    6. 2000s = 36.3

    Overall average per film = 41.35 (41)


    {[]

    How did I know that this will all end up into another pointless raking table :D
    President of the 'Misty Eyes Club'.

    Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy Behind you !Posts: 63,792MI6 Agent
    I think some Bond fans are accounts, hence the love for
    Lists of figures ? :D
    "I've been informed that there ARE a couple of QAnon supporters who are fairly regular posters in AJB."
  • HatThrowingHenchmanHatThrowingHenchman Russia With LovePosts: 1,834MI6 Agent
    Higgins wrote:
    am747 wrote:
    Decade average:

    1. 1960s = 45.5
    2. 1970s = 42.2
    3. 1980s = 41.0
    4. 2010s = 40.0
    5. 1990s = 37.7
    6. 2000s = 36.3

    Overall average per film = 41.35 (41)
    am747 wrote:

    48 = FRWL and OHMSS
    46 = DN
    45 = GF and TSWLM
    44 = TB, LALD, OP and TLD
    42 = YOLT and TMWTGG
    41 = DAF, LTK and SP
    40 = FYEO
    39 = MR, TND, TWINE, CR and SF
    36 = AVTAK
    35 = GE, DAD and QoS


    Decade average:
    1. 1960s = 45.5
    2. 1970s = 42.2
    3. 1980s = 41.0
    4. 2010s = 40.0
    5. 1990s = 37.7
    6. 2000s = 36.3

    Overall average per film = 41.35 (41)


    {[]

    How did I know that this will all end up into another pointless raking table :D

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SfnM-fDHlrs
    "You see Mr.Bond, you can't kill my dreams...but my dreams can kill you.Time to face destiny" - "Time to face gravity"
  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy Behind you !Posts: 63,792MI6 Agent
    edited December 2015
    " It's a kind of Tragic !" ;)

    Although, If lists are what you enjoy, then list away -{ we all have
    our passions.
    "I've been informed that there ARE a couple of QAnon supporters who are fairly regular posters in AJB."
  • am747am747 Posts: 720MI6 Agent
    Those who like to rate films on IMDB, if you divide the total by 5, you will get a number out of 10. That number can be used to rate movies (relatively objectively) on IMDB:

    Total = Movie = IMDB type of score (rounded)

    48 = FRWL and OHMSS = 9.6 (10)
    46 = DN = 9.2 (9)
    45 = GF and TSWLM = 9
    44 = TB, LALD, OP and TLD = 8.8 (9)
    42 = YOLT and TMWTGG = 8.4 (8)
    41 = DAF, LTK and SP = (8)
    40 = FYEO = 8
    39 = MR, TND, TWINE, CR and SF = 7.8 (8)
    36 = AVTAK = 7.2 (7)
    35 = GE, DAD and QoS = 7

    {[]
  • am747am747 Posts: 720MI6 Agent
    I think some Bond fans are accounts, hence the love for
    Lists of figures ? :D

    Not an accounts but I like the figures to be well rounded ;)
  • am747am747 Posts: 720MI6 Agent
    One way of knowing how you have done on your ratings is to see what is the minimum that you can give to a Bond film on IMDB. For me, it is 6 / 10 in the worst case. Usually it is around 7 or higher. The total of my lowest rated films come to 35 or 7 on IMDB .... So if I have a total of a film is less than 30, it would mean that I may have not rated the film as objectively as I would have liked

    So if someone has a total of say 20 for a film. It = 4 on IMDB. IMO, that would be a low overall score for a Bond film. In such cases, the rating could be off or not nearly as objectively done
  • HigginsHiggins GermanyPosts: 16,618MI6 Agent
    I am so glad that I am grown up and confident enough to make my opinion on a 007 movie without relying or needing it reconfirmed by IMDB or one of these pointless w rankings :s
    President of the 'Misty Eyes Club'.

    Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!
  • am747am747 Posts: 720MI6 Agent
    Higgins wrote:
    I am so glad that I am grown up and confident enough to make my opinion on a 007 movie without relying or needing it reconfirmed by IMDB or one of these pointless w rankings :s

    For whatever reasons, you are still following the ranking or ratings on this thread :)) .... The membership for the so-called misty-eyed club is not high, so I suggested you spend more time on recruiting some members :p
  • HatThrowingHenchmanHatThrowingHenchman Russia With LovePosts: 1,834MI6 Agent
    good strategy to go off topic and get personal :#
    "You see Mr.Bond, you can't kill my dreams...but my dreams can kill you.Time to face destiny" - "Time to face gravity"
  • am747am747 Posts: 720MI6 Agent
    Not a big fan of grouping films based on actors but anyways .... Avg score per film for each Bond actor:

    * GL = 48.0
    * SC = 44.3
    * TD = 42.5
    * RM = 41.4
    * DC = 38.5
    * PB = 37.0

    {[]
Sign In or Register to comment.