326

Re: AJB live commentary on THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN

Shady Tree wrote:

That was our last Barry Bond in these viewings  ajb007/frown  ajb007/frown

Hadn't realised that.  ajb007/frown

Oh well, at least there's still an Arnold to go.

327

Re: AJB live commentary on THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN

TWINE on Friday and I‘ll try to setup a Zoom conference then

President of the 'Misty Eyes Club'.

-------Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!------

328

Re: AJB live commentary on THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN

I like this unusual photo of Britt Ekland. Serious and smart, but still very beautiful.

https://imperialblack.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/tumblr_static_edit-jpg.jpeg

329

Re: AJB live commentary on THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN

ajb007/amazed

President of the 'Misty Eyes Club'.

-------Dalton - the weak and weepy Bond!------

330

Re: AJB live commentary on THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN

Number24 wrote:

Moore ... could have been a good villan in "The Jackal", something I didn't see until tonight.

I believe he wanted the part, as did Michael Caine, but both were turned down in favour of someone more anonymous.

331

Re: AJB live commentary on THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN

Higgins wrote:

TWINE on Friday and I‘ll try to setup a Zoom conference then

Both fine by me

332

Re: AJB live commentary on THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN

Barbel wrote:
Number24 wrote:

Moore ... could have been a good villan in "The Jackal", something I didn't see until tonight.

I believe he wanted the part, as did Michael Caine, but both were turned down in favour of someone more anonymous.

He certainly did

333

Re: AJB live commentary on THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN

Edward Fox was the right man to play The Jackal.

334

Re: AJB live commentary on THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN

Higgins wrote:

TWINE on Friday

Glad to hear that. It's my favourite of the Brosnan films, and IMHO beats several of the others, too.

335

Re: AJB live commentary on THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN

Barbel wrote:

Edward Fox was the right man to play The Jackal.

He was, but for the first time I think Roger Moore could have been a good Jackal too.

336

Re: AJB live commentary on THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN

Barbel wrote:

Edward Fox was the right man to play The Jackal.

Agreed. A very chilling performance. Interesting to think of the alternative, though, with a 'reverse' hero/villain dynamic between Michel Lonsdale and Moore (even though the Jackal and the detective get only a fleeting moment of shared screen time).

Last edited by Shady Tree (15th Jun 2020 21:34)

Critics and material I don't need. I haven't changed my act in 49 years.

337

Re: AJB live commentary on THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN

TMWTGG.....

I think the best way to describe this film is a transition between times. I say that because LALD had all the spooky surreal voodoo stuff before, and TSWLM has an army or perhaps I should say Navy or willing troops, the Liparus and Atlantis. TMWTGG is the middle ground between the two, and this is highlighted best by the way the characters interact and the huge McGuffin in the Solex Agitation device.

In the early seventies the energy crisis was going on (as brilliantly re-enacted recently in The Crown) on Netflix. The same frustration and irritation radiates in this film. Apart from Scaramanga played with cruel and commanding glee by Sir Christopher Lee, all the other characters are various shades of pissed off. M, Moneypenny, Hi Fat, Nick Nack and Bond who comes across as too thuggish when he attacks Andrea. The fact Moore hated doing that scene,and would be friends wil Maud Adams for the the rest of his life speaks volumes as to how good he was.
    I feel Britt Ekland gets a raw deal as Goodnight. A character written for light relief can be a narrow line between funny and dippy depending on the script and here the script takes advantage of making her look silly for some ‘cheeky’ fun.

Certain aspects of the film work brilliantly the locations, esp Hong Kong and James Bond Island are stunningly beautiful, the latter a lost paradise now due to the films that put it on the map.
  Yip, Hi Fat and the other local characters are a bit stereotypical, but this was 1974.
Unfortunately the film repeats two horrendous errors left over from LALD.

The first is Pepper. He was bad enough in his own territory. Dragging him back here on holiday is in itself criminal. The fact he is in two separate sequences is unforgivable. This is where a Mrs Bell, or Mr Bleaker repeat would have worked, or even bring in Felix L or another old friend of Bond’s might have worked.

The second is the duel scene between Bond and Scaramanga is lacking. At the dinner table Scaramanga talks up how the two of them are the best of the best. But once matters get underway, Bond is running around the fun palace, while Scaramanga is skulking in the shadows. There is no real one on one aspect.  This repeats the demise of Dr Kananga in being very anti climatic.

TMWTGG does have the foreshadowing of Moore’s best. Locations, a few gadgetsbiting pieces of humour and prep towards industrial scale world domination plans. It’s just a pity the subject matter of the Solex is such a dated idea, like much of the decor.....

And I only got one proper machine that goes ping! 

As someone once said,  What’s next?

Last edited by Thunderbird 2 (15th Jun 2020 21:38)

This is Thunderbird 2, how can I be of assistance?

338

Re: AJB live commentary on THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN

Barbel wrote:
Higgins wrote:

TWINE on Friday and I‘ll try to setup a Zoom conference then

Both fine by me

Thunderbird Too on TWINE. My fav Brosnan Bond and second only to CR-06.
Can’t wait to see the Q Boat.

This is Thunderbird 2, how can I be of assistance?

339

Re: AJB live commentary on THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN

Mrs Bell instead of Pepper would have worked much better. Great idea!

340

Re: AJB live commentary on THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN

@Thunderbird 2. Regarding your comments on not liking having Pepper back. He has an overtly casual racism here which he didn't have explicitly in LALD. I think that makes him a problem character looking at it today. He has a lot of vitality, though, and his presence has the effect of displacing Hip, an ineffective character, who basically disappears from the movie after a series of bungles.

Critics and material I don't need. I haven't changed my act in 49 years.

341

Re: AJB live commentary on THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN

Well, I'm looking forward to TWINE in Friday. It has always been a favourite of mine, and I've never understood the venom directed towards it. Sure, it has flaws like any other Bond film but there are many strong points too.

342

Re: AJB live commentary on THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN

The corona shutdown would have been harder to endure without these watchalongs. (raises very Bondian blass of Coke Zero)
-To Higgins  ajb007/bond

343

Re: AJB live commentary on THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN

Barbel wrote:

The score isn't one of Barry's best, but it does have its moments- the jazz instrumental of the main theme is great fun for example! As Shady indicates above, Barry wrote this score in a hurry after being brought in very late (he had a busy schedule). He uses his main theme in various arrangements (slow tempo and strings for love scenes ("Goodnight Goodnight"), uptempo and brassy for action ("Kung Fu Fight") plus the jazz version) rather than write, say, a separate love theme- not since GF had a Barry Bond score relied so heavily on one main theme.
There's no new music on the 2003 remaster, and Nic Raine covered only one piece- a medley which appears at the end of the movie- "Slow Boat To China" (very similar to "Goodnight Goodnight") plus "Nick Nack".


Plenty of actually rather decent remade versions of the missing tracks on YouTube though:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtcSS90 … p;index=12

344

Re: AJB live commentary on THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN

Thunderbird 2 wrote:

TMWTGG.....

I think the best way to describe this film is a transition between times. I say that because LALD had all the spooky surreal voodoo stuff before, and TSWLM has an army or perhaps I should say Navy or willing troops, the Liparus and Atlantis. TMWTGG is the middle ground between the two, and this is highlighted best by the way the characters interact and the huge McGuffin in the Solex Agitation device.

In the early seventies the energy crisis was going on (as brilliantly re-enacted recently in The Crown) on Netflix. The same frustration and irritation radiates in this film. Apart from Scaramanga played with cruel and commanding glee by Sir Christopher Lee, all the other characters are various shades of pissed off. M, Moneypenny, Hi Fat, Nick Nack and Bond who comes across as too thuggish when he attacks Andrea. The fact Moore hated doing that scene,and would be friends wil Maud Adams for the the rest of his life speaks volumes as to how good he was.
    I feel Britt Ekland gets a raw deal as Goodnight. A character written for light relief can be a narrow line between funny and dippy depending on the script and here the script takes advantage of making her look silly for some ‘cheeky’ fun.

Certain aspects of the film work brilliantly the locations, esp Hong Kong and James Bond Island are stunningly beautiful, the latter a lost paradise now due to the films that put it on the map.
  Yip, Hi Fat and the other local characters are a bit stereotypical, but this was 1974.
Unfortunately the film repeats two horrendous errors left over from LALD.

The first is Pepper. He was bad enough in his own territory. Dragging him back here on holiday is in itself criminal. The fact he is in two separate sequences is unforgivable. This is where a Mrs Bell, or Mr Bleaker repeat would have worked, or even bring in Felix L or another old friend of Bond’s might have worked.

The second is the duel scene between Bond and Scaramanga is lacking. At the dinner table Scaramanga talks up how the two of them are the best of the best. But once matters get underway, Bond is running around the fun palace, while Scaramanga is skulking in the shadows. There is no real one on one aspect.  This repeats the demise of Dr Kananga in being very anti climatic.

TMWTGG does have the foreshadowing of Moore’s best. Locations, a few gadgetsbiting pieces of humour and prep towards industrial scale world domination plans. It’s just a pity the subject matter of the Solex is such a dated idea, like much of the decor.....

And I only got one proper machine that goes ping! 

As someone once said,  What’s next?


Personally I think it's slightly baffling that they had a film where the villain is the greatest assassin on the planet, and the climax is all about some little silver box- why wouldn't you have had Bond racing to stop an assassination?! Trying to stop WW3 being started by Scaramanga killing someone? I mean, that's what all films about assassins are about isn't it? Like the Jackal mentioned above.


Also, another odd note is that Bond is very much the aggressor here and it can be argued that Scaramanga didn't really deserve his attention. He never threatened to kill Bond, and the Solex is something that Gibson builds while he's in the employ of Scaramanga and Hai Fat: the British have no claim on it whatsoever. Bond is just told to go and kill Scaramanga and take it.
Bond even suggests that Scaramanga will take the money from the oil companies to suppress the Solex technology, and when MI6 recover it at the end, do we ever hear about it again? I wonder what they could possibly have done with it...

345

Re: AJB live commentary on THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN

Barbel wrote:
Number24 wrote:

Moore ... could have been a good villan in "The Jackal", something I didn't see until tonight.

I believe he wanted the part, as did Michael Caine, but both were turned down in favour of someone more anonymous.

That's fascinating stuff. Caine would definitely have been better (bringing some of that Get Carter steel) but I can't deny I would have liked to have seen Roger do it. It would have been well within his range.

I think I might have preferred Caine to Fox, actually; good though Fox is.

346

Re: AJB live commentary on THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN

Shady Tree wrote:

@Thunderbird 2. Regarding your comments on not liking having Pepper back. He has an overtly casual racism here which he didn't have explicitly in LALD. I think that makes him a problem character looking at it today. He has a lot of vitality, though, and his presence has the effect of displacing Hip, an ineffective character, who basically disappears from the movie after a series of bungles.

That’s the irony Shady Tree.  I was born a year later, so I’d be the first to agree it’s part of the times. There are lots of films and tv shows of that era - In Sickness and In Health, Fawlty Towers and Rising Damp all spring to mind.
  I have seen Clifton James in one or two other things too, he is a good actor.

No, I just find Pepper a loudmouthed irritating pain in the arse! Always have. Screen time given him could definitely have been better spent in other ways. I agree though, Yip is a likeable but useless characters, as are all the “waffle-waffle emote-emote” boffins, except of course for Q.

This is Thunderbird 2, how can I be of assistance?

347

Re: AJB live commentary on THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN

Shady Tree wrote:

That carplane looks like it could have fallen out of the sky at any moment.

There's a good reason you might think that: it was based on the AVE Mizar which... fell out of the sky.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AVE_Mizar

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/80/AVE-Mizar-1973-N68X-XL.jpg

348

Re: AJB live commentary on THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN

emtiem wrote:
Thunderbird 2 wrote:

TMWTGG.....

I think the best way to describe this film is a transition between times. I say that because LALD had all the spooky surreal voodoo stuff before, and TSWLM has an army or perhaps I should say Navy or willing troops, the Liparus and Atlantis. TMWTGG is the middle ground between the two, and this is highlighted best by the way the characters interact and the huge McGuffin in the Solex Agitation device.

In the early seventies the energy crisis was going on (as brilliantly re-enacted recently in The Crown) on Netflix. The same frustration and irritation radiates in this film. Apart from Scaramanga played with cruel and commanding glee by Sir Christopher Lee, all the other characters are various shades of pissed off. M, Moneypenny, Hi Fat, Nick Nack and Bond who comes across as too thuggish when he attacks Andrea. The fact Moore hated doing that scene,and would be friends wil Maud Adams for the the rest of his life speaks volumes as to how good he was.
    I feel Britt Ekland gets a raw deal as Goodnight. A character written for light relief can be a narrow line between funny and dippy depending on the script and here the script takes advantage of making her look silly for some ‘cheeky’ fun.

Certain aspects of the film work brilliantly the locations, esp Hong Kong and James Bond Island are stunningly beautiful, the latter a lost paradise now due to the films that put it on the map.
  Yip, Hi Fat and the other local characters are a bit stereotypical, but this was 1974.
Unfortunately the film repeats two horrendous errors left over from LALD.

The first is Pepper. He was bad enough in his own territory. Dragging him back here on holiday is in itself criminal. The fact he is in two separate sequences is unforgivable. This is where a Mrs Bell, or Mr Bleaker repeat would have worked, or even bring in Felix L or another old friend of Bond’s might have worked.

The second is the duel scene between Bond and Scaramanga is lacking. At the dinner table Scaramanga talks up how the two of them are the best of the best. But once matters get underway, Bond is running around the fun palace, while Scaramanga is skulking in the shadows. There is no real one on one aspect.  This repeats the demise of Dr Kananga in being very anti climatic.

TMWTGG does have the foreshadowing of Moore’s best. Locations, a few gadgetsbiting pieces of humour and prep towards industrial scale world domination plans. It’s just a pity the subject matter of the Solex is such a dated idea, like much of the decor.....

And I only got one proper machine that goes ping! 

As someone once said,  What’s next?


Personally I think it's slightly baffling that they had a film where the villain is the greatest assassin on the planet, and the climax is all about some little silver box- why wouldn't you have had Bond racing to stop an assassination?! Trying to stop WW3 being started by Scaramanga killing someone? I mean, that's what all films about assassins are about isn't it? Like the Jackal mentioned above.


Also, another odd note is that Bond is very much the aggressor here and it can be argued that Scaramanga didn't really deserve his attention. He never threatened to kill Bond, and the Solex is something that Gibson builds while he's in the employ of Scaramanga and Hai Fat: the British have no claim on it whatsoever. Bond is just told to go and kill Scaramanga and take it.
Bond even suggests that Scaramanga will take the money from the oil companies to suppress the Solex technology, and when MI6 recover it at the end, do we ever hear about it again? I wonder what they could possibly have done with it...

It's Andrea who intentionally puts Scaramanga and Bond on a colission course. I like that. It makes her more than a passive victim by betting Bond will kill Scaramanga before Scaramnaga kills her.

349

Re: AJB live commentary on THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN

Number24 wrote:
emtiem wrote:
Thunderbird 2 wrote:

TMWTGG.....

I think the best way to describe this film is a transition between times. I say that because LALD had all the spooky surreal voodoo stuff before, and TSWLM has an army or perhaps I should say Navy or willing troops, the Liparus and Atlantis. TMWTGG is the middle ground between the two, and this is highlighted best by the way the characters interact and the huge McGuffin in the Solex Agitation device.

In the early seventies the energy crisis was going on (as brilliantly re-enacted recently in The Crown) on Netflix. The same frustration and irritation radiates in this film. Apart from Scaramanga played with cruel and commanding glee by Sir Christopher Lee, all the other characters are various shades of pissed off. M, Moneypenny, Hi Fat, Nick Nack and Bond who comes across as too thuggish when he attacks Andrea. The fact Moore hated doing that scene,and would be friends wil Maud Adams for the the rest of his life speaks volumes as to how good he was.
    I feel Britt Ekland gets a raw deal as Goodnight. A character written for light relief can be a narrow line between funny and dippy depending on the script and here the script takes advantage of making her look silly for some ‘cheeky’ fun.

Certain aspects of the film work brilliantly the locations, esp Hong Kong and James Bond Island are stunningly beautiful, the latter a lost paradise now due to the films that put it on the map.
  Yip, Hi Fat and the other local characters are a bit stereotypical, but this was 1974.
Unfortunately the film repeats two horrendous errors left over from LALD.

The first is Pepper. He was bad enough in his own territory. Dragging him back here on holiday is in itself criminal. The fact he is in two separate sequences is unforgivable. This is where a Mrs Bell, or Mr Bleaker repeat would have worked, or even bring in Felix L or another old friend of Bond’s might have worked.

The second is the duel scene between Bond and Scaramanga is lacking. At the dinner table Scaramanga talks up how the two of them are the best of the best. But once matters get underway, Bond is running around the fun palace, while Scaramanga is skulking in the shadows. There is no real one on one aspect.  This repeats the demise of Dr Kananga in being very anti climatic.

TMWTGG does have the foreshadowing of Moore’s best. Locations, a few gadgetsbiting pieces of humour and prep towards industrial scale world domination plans. It’s just a pity the subject matter of the Solex is such a dated idea, like much of the decor.....

And I only got one proper machine that goes ping! 

As someone once said,  What’s next?


Personally I think it's slightly baffling that they had a film where the villain is the greatest assassin on the planet, and the climax is all about some little silver box- why wouldn't you have had Bond racing to stop an assassination?! Trying to stop WW3 being started by Scaramanga killing someone? I mean, that's what all films about assassins are about isn't it? Like the Jackal mentioned above.


Also, another odd note is that Bond is very much the aggressor here and it can be argued that Scaramanga didn't really deserve his attention. He never threatened to kill Bond, and the Solex is something that Gibson builds while he's in the employ of Scaramanga and Hai Fat: the British have no claim on it whatsoever. Bond is just told to go and kill Scaramanga and take it.
Bond even suggests that Scaramanga will take the money from the oil companies to suppress the Solex technology, and when MI6 recover it at the end, do we ever hear about it again? I wonder what they could possibly have done with it...

It's Andrea who intentionally puts Scaramanga and Bond on a colission course. I like that. It makes her more than a passive victim by betting Bond will kill Scaramanga before Scaramnaga kills her.

That is good, and the plot of the film is pretty decent before all of the Solex nonsense crops up (if you ignore that Bond goes to Beirut to retrieve a bullet... despite already being sent one in the post!). If she'd sent the bullet to put him on Scaramanga's trail because he was about to make an enormous hit on the Russian President or whatever...

350

Re: AJB live commentary on THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN

Bond/Scaramanga as two halves of the same coin heading for a duel - Mankiewicz
Solex + energy crisis - Maibaum

Maibaum replaced Mankiewicz (it had been the other way round on DAF) whose relationship with Hamilton had deteriorated after 3 movies together.